Who has replaced Guy Smith at Red Tractor?

Bury the Trash

Member
Mixed Farmer
Sidney sweet pea I've just combined 40 acres, give me a chance

You said and I quote when we discussing Red Tractor:

I said I was willing to pay for a service for assurance I am compliant in one inspection. I don't want bells and whistles.

Now if that means another obtuse form of assurance everyone else is unaware of then so be it but it reads to me that you are willing to pay for assurance - in the grain trade there is one form of assurance -Red Tractor because they are the only ones who have made it up. Whether or not you want bells and whistles for organic or grass fed etc is irrelavant to this because you are making a decision on that based on your farming system. The fence you have impaled yourself on must be hurting!
Sweat pea ?hes more a pickled gherkin lol
 

Sid

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
South Molton
CBA? How many farms are scraping by on a tiny amount of staff? A lot of us are on the older side and struggling to keep up with legislation and computer tapping while keeping on top of the actual, physical workload. We all take far too much on because we somehow have to make the business profitable. It's really not CBA ...it's why doesn't the union who purports to represent British farmers actually represent our interests and how can they create an assurance scheme that works against its members and favour importers? It's their main job, damnit, and they have failed. Our job is to produce food. We shouldn't have to (and have not got time to) defend and represent food production in this country. What are the NFU for FFS?

That's not a CBA situation IMHO, that's a I'll pay my dues and get "employ" someone else to represent my interests.
The issue with any representative organisation is they have to represent everyone, big, small, organic, conventional, arable , livestock.

Within those there is of course conflicts of interest.
 

Sid

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
South Molton
Yep I can do it while unloading but I can't find quotes.

As I said you are willing to pay for assurance. I was correct, I've quoted you.

At the very least with the milk you do tend to get RT label on a 4 pinter from the supermarket so there is an element of capture of the alleged "brand" even though its shite, but in grain we are shafted from the moment the grain leaves the farm and yet have the costs of complying, so its why we are so pee'd off.

Apology accepted given that you style yourself such a gentleman :)

No apology made.

I said I wish the have a basic assurance scheme if that's what the "consumer " requires
 

ajd132

Member
Arable Farmer
Location
Suffolk
That's not a CBA situation IMHO, that's a I'll pay my dues and get "employ" someone else to represent my interests.
The issue with any representative organisation is they have to represent everyone, big, small, organic, conventional, arable , livestock.

Within those there is of course conflicts of interest.
The NFU leadership, should be directing its employees in what they need to do. But the Leadership is weak, employees do what they want. There is zero accountability and too much pontification at all levels of that organisation.
 

Grass And Grain

Member
Mixed Farmer
Location
Yorks
Yes we have to have a 12 month inspection for Organic, Red Tractor done the same time, couple of hours for Organic then quick 10 minutes just double checking we've covered everything for Red Tractor or the inspector says they'll fill it in when they get home :D
I would say alot of things Red Tractor have copied from Organic, things that have been in Organic for 10/ 20 years have creeper into Red Tractor, especially herd health plans etc
Feed / vet meds stuff like that yes inspector goes through with fine tooth comb must all add up .
OK, so seems organic producers are paying for RT when the organic audit has pretty much already checked the same things. For want of better terminology - this is silliness.

Question is, how do we tackle it?

First point of contact should be with SA and OF&G? Would they help their producers by contacting processors and explaining their farmers don't need RT (as already covered by organic audit).

Organic milk (OMSCO???) might be a good place to start? @Sid what do you think? Is your RT audit covering anything extra to your organic one? We should work to help you guys out on this one?

If there's some common sense milage in this issue, then British Farming Union could make a representation. Maybe could get a group of like minded organic BFU members to represent themselves under BFU banner. That's how it will probably work to start with. Represent the issues in your own sector. As Said has said, let's not moan and complain, but actually do something to help ourselves.

Would be great to build the case for organic producers to not need RT. Get SA and OF&G to help with any tweaks in standards.
 
Last edited:

Grass And Grain

Member
Mixed Farmer
Location
Yorks
OK, so seems organic producers are paying for RT when the organic audit has pretty much already checked the same things. For want of better terminology - this is silliness.

Question is, how do we tackle it?

First point of contact should be with SA and OF&G? Would they help their producers by contacting processors and explaining their farmers don't need RT (as already covered by organic audit).

Organic milk (OMSCO???) might be a good place to start? @Sid what do you think? Is your RT audit covering anything extra to your organic one? We should work to help you guys out on this one?
I'm pretty certain consumers will have much more confidence in the organic badge than the RT logo. They'll understand the former, but probably won't know what the latter does.
 

Sid

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
South Molton
OK, so seems organic producers are paying for RT when the organic audit has pretty much already checked the same things. For want of better terminology - this is silliness.

Question is, how do we tackle it?

First point of contact should be with SA and OF&G? Would they help their producers by contacting processors and explaining their farmers don't need RT (as already covered by organic audit).

Organic milk (OMSCO???) might be a good place to start? @Sid what do you think? Is your RT audit covering anything extra to your organic one? We should work to help you guys out on this one?

If there's some common sense milage in this issue, then British Farming Union could make a representation. Maybe could get a group of like minded organic BFU members to represent themselves under BFU banner. That's how it will probably work to start with. Represent the issues in your own sector. As Said has said, let's not moan and complain, but actually do something to help ourselves.

Would be great to build the case for organic producers to not need RT. Get SA and OF&G to help with any tweaks in standards.
Liner changes
Parlour servicing
Data sheets

Off the top of my head not covered by RT.

Basically mostly non specifically organic stuff.
Eartags and movement I believe is within organic standards.

Milk buyers will not take non RT milk.
 

Sid

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
South Molton
OK, so seems organic producers are paying for RT when the organic audit has pretty much already checked the same things. For want of better terminology - this is silliness.

Question is, how do we tackle it?

First point of contact should be with SA and OF&G? Would they help their producers by contacting processors and explaining their farmers don't need RT (as already covered by organic audit).

Organic milk (OMSCO???) might be a good place to start? @Sid what do you think? Is your RT audit covering anything extra to your organic one? We should work to help you guys out on this one?

If there's some common sense milage in this issue, then British Farming Union could make a representation. Maybe could get a group of like minded organic BFU members to represent themselves under BFU banner. That's how it will probably work to start with. Represent the issues in your own sector. As Said has said, let's not moan and complain, but actually do something to help ourselves.

Would be great to build the case for organic producers to not need RT. Get SA and OF&G to help with any tweaks in standards.
Who is we?
 

Sid

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
South Molton
Maybe we can change this.

BFU and any members who are paying for RT when the need to do so could be negated.

Change it to what? You want to tell the cert bodies what they should be inspecting for that's outside the organic remit? They will doing an HSE check as well next!!

As I understand the organic inspection is not done by the cert bodies in majority of cases. It's done by independent inspectors who also cover many other standards. RT etc

They are not directly employed by the cert bodies but self employed in many cases.

It also gives the inspection independence and credibility.
 

Grass And Grain

Member
Mixed Farmer
Location
Yorks
Change it to what? You want to tell the cert bodies what they should be inspecting for that's outside the organic remit? They will doing an HSE check as well next!!

As I understand the organic inspection is not done by the cert bodies in majority of cases. It's done by independent inspectors who also cover many other standards. RT etc

They are not directly employed by the cert bodies but self employed in many cases.

It also gives the inspection independence and credibility.
Yes, independent inspection bodies, who simply inspect as per the standards set by the scheme they're inspecting.

So instead of paying full price for organic cert + full price for RT, just pay for organic cert which could have an optional add-on for any of additional things covered by RT (but at fraction of the cost).
 

Treg

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
Cornwall
Yes, independent inspection bodies, who simply inspect as per the standards set by the scheme they're inspecting.

So instead of paying full price for organic cert + full price for RT, just pay for organic cert which could have an optional add-on for any of additional things covered by RT (but at fraction of the cost).
I think the Certification bodies just find it easier to pass on the work.
There's also the problem of if and when there's a time we can't sell our produce as Organic the Organic certification then means nothing , it should do but doesn't.
There's not really a market down here for Organic cull cows so I need Red Tractor for them.
The whole system is wrong not just the inspections , the Slaughterhouses would need to except Organic as Equal to Red Tractor :rolleyes: and the supermarkets would as well, I'm sure they know just they need to tick a box to say Organic certification = Red Tractor just different sticker.
 

Sid

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
South Molton
Yes, independent inspection bodies, who simply inspect as per the standards set by the scheme they're inspecting.

So instead of paying full price for organic cert + full price for RT, just pay for organic cert which could have an optional add-on for any of additional things covered by RT (but at fraction of the cost).
If you think an assurance scheme with its legal framework can be set up on the cheap , I think you're very much mistaken.
400k? 400 organic dairy farmers in 4 or 5 different certification bodies.
£1000 a year?
 

MrNoo

Member
Arable Farmer
Location
Cirencester
Moan that the unions or associations have "left" it happen when infact they aren't members,

Ahdb amd RT aren't always "consultations"
I commend you on your staunch support of the NFU, they are very lucky to have you. The fact is farmers are busy people, they tend not to get onto committees, boards because they are n fact working.
I'd sooner stick pins in my eyes than re join the sh!t show that is NFU.
I an utterly astonished how you continue to defend the indefensible
 

Treg

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
Cornwall
If you think an assurance scheme with its legal framework can be set up on the cheap , I think you're very much mistaken.
400k? 400 organic dairy farmers in 4 or 5 different certification bodies.
£1000 a year?
A thought has occurred to me , sounds like Lloyd's has gone , I wonder if Wayne copes group will take on this work and if so will it bring around a change?
What do think @Sid Most/ all of his Inspectors are a good bunch .
 

Grass And Grain

Member
Mixed Farmer
Location
Yorks
I think the Certification bodies just find it easier to pass on the work.
There's also the problem of if and when there's a time we can't sell our produce as Organic the Organic certification then means nothing , it should do but doesn't.
There's not really a market down here for Organic cull cows so I need Red Tractor for them.
The whole system is wrong not just the inspections , the Slaughterhouses would need to except Organic as Equal to Red Tractor :rolleyes: and the supermarkets would as well, I'm sure they know just they need to tick a box to say Organic certification = Red Tractor just different sticker.
RT recognise other schemes. E.g. Scottish schemes are seen as equivalent, and so SQC grain can carry the RT logo. Same system could apply.
Slaughter houses, processors, retailers just need educating that organic has RT equivalence.
If you think an assurance scheme with its legal framework can be set up on the cheap , I think you're very much mistaken.
400k? 400 organic dairy farmers in 4 or 5 different certification bodies.
£1000 a year?
The "legal framework???" already exists in existing organic standards. Just a case of adding on the half dozen or so questions on to the end of the organic audit (optional add-on). If it costs £400k, then the boards want a clear out. Could be done for a few £k.
 

Humble Village Farmer

Member
BASE UK Member
Location
Essex
@Sid @Treg NFU aren't going to represent on this issue imho, because if they did, they'd cause loss of all the organic members from their own RT scheme.

Seems duplication is an easy thing to get stopped, but no-one has done anything about it.
This clearly demonstrates that rat is only about collecting fees. The same inspector on the same day, but charging for 2 inspections???

There is at least a point to organic certification.
 

Sid

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
South Molton
I commend you on your staunch support of the NFU, they are very lucky to have you. The fact is farmers are busy people, they tend not to get onto committees, boards because they are n fact working.
I'd sooner stick pins in my eyes than re join the sh!t show that is NFU.
I an utterly astonished how you continue to defend the indefensible
If you want something done ask a busy person.

If you won't get involved in the discussion process then how can you complain about the outcomes? You want people to guess what you want? 🤔

Defend what precisely. RT? I haven't.
 

SFI - What % were you taking out of production?

  • 0 %

    Votes: 105 40.4%
  • Up to 25%

    Votes: 95 36.5%
  • 25-50%

    Votes: 39 15.0%
  • 50-75%

    Votes: 5 1.9%
  • 75-100%

    Votes: 3 1.2%
  • 100% I’ve had enough of farming!

    Votes: 13 5.0%

May Event: The most profitable farm diversification strategy 2024 - Mobile Data Centres

  • 1,821
  • 32
With just a internet connection and a plug socket you too can join over 70 farms currently earning up to £1.27 ppkw ~ 201% ROI

Register Here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/the-mo...2024-mobile-data-centres-tickets-871045770347

Tuesday, May 21 · 10am - 2pm GMT+1

Location: Village Hotel Bury, Rochdale Road, Bury, BL9 7BQ

The Farming Forum has teamed up with the award winning hardware manufacturer Easy Compute to bring you an educational talk about how AI and blockchain technology is helping farmers to diversify their land.

Over the past 7 years, Easy Compute have been working with farmers, agricultural businesses, and renewable energy farms all across the UK to help turn leftover space into mini data centres. With...
Top