- Location
- South Wales UK
Farming leaders look forward to a happier new year
Defra Secretary of State Steve Barclay pledges to make farmers' lives easier
www.farmersguardian.com
You mean how much it's costing us to tell them what a scam they are.ive seen better survey done by students as part of college courses
wonder how much this is costing for such poor service
Not mine.Absolutely priceless, and he is likely to be our nest president
I keep saying it: The review is a smokescreen to permit time for the retail consortium to rebrand the greening module. They need our enviromental wealth to allow them continued profiteering from plastic packaged processed food pollutionAh yeh never thought of it that way. Why should he know anymore than you or I if its truly independant.
I too am wondering about the source of this survey. Aside from the very amateur questionnaire construction, Christmas hols timing of it there is a couple of things that don't read right in the info. introduction, highlighted below.For what it's worthView attachment 1156205
My green credentials are not for sale or bribe. I'm happy to be a green credential free of charge to our rural community, who might, hopefully will respect it, but not to a retail consortium.I keep saying it: The review is a smokescreen to permit time for the retail consortium to rebrand the greening module. They need our enviromental wealth to allow them continued profiteering from plastic packaged processed food pollution
Beyond unbelievable that Tom Bradshaw posts evidence of the corruption. Don't know whether it's utter contempt for the farming industry, or utter incompetence? Or both?
I am flabbergasted by the utter arrogance and total contempt being exhibited by our supposed industry representative
Think its real, bradshaws response confirms it, it seems. Its very shoddy thoI too am wondering about the source of this survey. Aside from the very amateur questionnaire construction, Christmas hols timing of it there is a couple of things that don't read right in the info. introduction, highlighted below.
View attachment 1156207
Like you, I'm skeptical that such a badly constructed survey could be validI too am wondering about the source of this survey. Aside from the very amateur questionnaire construction, Christmas hols timing of it there is a couple of things that don't read right in the info. introduction, highlighted below.
View attachment 1156207
But why would he know anything about it. The NFU are paying CT to go and review RT governance INDEPENDENTLY. I daresay TB would have been sent a link to this online questionnaire, but why would he know who it had or hadn’t been sent to if the review is independent?Think its real, bradshaws response confirms it, it seems. Its very shoddy tho
Bit fishy, maybe someone dropped us a trump card by disclosing it at risk of their job. The email address is active and correct though and I'd encourage using itI too am wondering about the source of this survey. Aside from the very amateur questionnaire construction, Christmas hols timing of it there is a couple of things that don't read right in the info. introduction, highlighted below.
View attachment 1156207
Its not tho isnt it, its a bloody whitewashBut why would he know anything about it. The NFU are paying CT to go and review RT governance INDEPENDENTLY. I daresay TB would have been sent a link to this online questionnaire, but why would he know who it had or hadn’t been sent to if the review is independent?
Because it's not independentBut why would he know anything about it. The NFU are paying CT to go and review RT governance INDEPENDENTLY. I daresay TB would have been sent a link to this online questionnaire, but why would he know who it had or hadn’t been sent to if the review is independent?
Or nfu mutual funds???Because it's not independent
It's a smokescreen
Supermarkets need to decimate British agriculture to meet their WWF basket enviromental commitments
How many shares in supermarket companies do the NFU own?
But he doesn't do social media apparently he told a tff memberView attachment 1156202
Caught with his pants down yet again. Dont worry chaps his story will change in the next 24/48 hours.
I've also looked.at their website - particularly the governance section and looked at the profiles of their senior team .Bit fishy, maybe someone dropped us a trump card by disclosing it at risk of their job. The email address is active and correct though and I'd encourage using it
John Deere, its got to be John Deere, another monopoly... finally I understand youHmm... let's do a bit of thinking about this, let's pretend that with regards to a certain industry an organisation exists, we'll call it 'Blue Lorry'. And let's imagine that there are people involved in the running of Blue Lorry, and associated to the running of it, who have a financial interest in its continued existence, and who have personally 'committed' to it to such an extent that they'll look pretty daft if any serious problems are found regarding it.
Now, just for fun let's suppose that, for various reasons, Blue Lorry comes in for a bit of flack from interested but awkward parties, and it's decided that a 'consultation' is needed to validate it and show how it really is a good and useful thing. And, for a miracle, the people organising the consultation decide that the group most likely to offer the desired result will be...?
Dont think hes very good at telling the truthBut he doesn't do social media apparently he told a tff member