Channel 4 now

Farma Parma

Member
Arable Farmer
Location
Northumberlandia
What is the most annoying thing I find about this programme is that there are all these enthusiastic young people who are all desperate to get on the farming ladder but the whole thing is really a charade.

In reality this looks a fairly difficult wet farm with a mix of buildings, but a lovely house. There is no mention of the economics of this operation.
How much rent?
Who claims CS or SFI?
How much tree planting and other conservation work has to be done and who pays for it?
Where does all the new shiny kit come from? Most new starters I know had an old loader tractor!
Whose are the 50 sheep that you need 10 people to round up and some big bales because they are in lamb?
The cattle looked good, but again are they there just for show? Not sure a tenant starting off would have the funds to finance them?

In reality how much would a NT tenant expect to earn/make profit in a year? They will need a pension or enough to have a mortgage on a house they own?

I would put the NT in the same category as NE in being impossible to deal with and not to be trusted.
I do agree with what your saying on this
Just saying too a pal last night i bet the rent is way more than what iam on in AHA terms
and you might have 10years & be shown the door or the gate then after you really are at there mercy.
I know Jamie personally but he has kept this all very quiet. better not ask how its going i see there is 8 episodes?
oh heck....
Its a bare bones stock farm & more sheep than cattle id say.
Poss only 35miles from me here but worlds apart in land types.
 

upnortheast

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
Northumberland
I suspect the shiney kit,sheep and horses were brought in for the filming.
Probably easier to be a NT tenant on that sort of farm than a highly productive dairy or arable farm.
The detailed letting details are still on line.
Search for Gallows hill farm. Wallington
 
Location
East Mids
What is the most annoying thing I find about this programme is that there are all these enthusiastic young people who are all desperate to get on the farming ladder but the whole thing is really a charade.

In reality this looks a fairly difficult wet farm with a mix of buildings, but a lovely house. There is no mention of the economics of this operation.
How much rent?
Who claims CS or SFI?
How much tree planting and other conservation work has to be done and who pays for it?
Where does all the new shiny kit come from? Most new starters I know had an old loader tractor!
Whose are the 50 sheep that you need 10 people to round up and some big bales because they are in lamb?
The cattle looked good, but again are they there just for show? Not sure a tenant starting off would have the funds to finance them?

In reality how much would a NT tenant expect to earn/make profit in a year? They will need a pension or enough to have a mortgage on a house they own?

I would put the NT in the same category as NE in being impossible to deal with and not to be trusted.
Its a tenancy. They have to put a business plan forward, more info will come out as the series progresses. NT can quiz them on their ideas and would also make clear if there was something specific they want them to do re: environmental stuff. SFI, BPS etc situation will have been made clear to tenands on asking the questions but with NT, would normally have go to the tenant.

The sheep and cattle belonged to the next door farmer and were being lent for the purposes of this exercise (they stated that in the programme). As the candidates hadn't worked with these sheep before you can't blame them for playing it safe with the bales, especially as there was some dodgy fencing in that area.

I would assume the kit was either hired from a local dealer or farmer for this exercise too.

The one couple has sold their house as they have learned from applying for previous tenancies that they need working capital to stock a farm. The vet has a smallholding at present so has some stock too.

I actually think it's an interesting approach to selecting tenants, having been through applying for a tenancy myself. There are some people who can talk the talk or get an agent to do a business plan for them but can't cope practically. This is giving the NT agents a chance to see whether the tenants can actually farm.

Other than the wildlife couple I would say they all have a realistic idea of what they are letting themselves in for.

NT also do things a bit differently at times - one of my first jobs as an ADAS consultant was for a youngster applying for a NT share farm set up, as they had longhorn cattle on the 'tenanted' farm which was next to a period house and one of the conditions of the new share farmer was that he had to buy half the value of the herd and continue it. When he finished his 10 years, he had half the value back.
 

Frank-the-Wool

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
East Sussex
Its a tenancy. They have to put a business plan forward, more info will come out as the series progresses. NT can quiz them on their ideas and would also make clear if there was something specific they want them to do re: environmental stuff. SFI, BPS etc situation will have been made clear to tenands on asking the questions but with NT, would normally have go to the tenant.

The sheep and cattle belonged to the next door farmer and were being lent for the purposes of this exercise (they stated that in the programme). As the candidates hadn't worked with these sheep before you can't blame them for playing it safe with the bales, especially as there was some dodgy fencing in that area.

I would assume the kit was either hired from a local dealer or farmer for this exercise too.

The one couple has sold their house as they have learned from applying for previous tenancies that they need working capital to stock a farm. The vet has a smallholding at present so has some stock too.

I actually think it's an interesting approach to selecting tenants, having been through applying for a tenancy myself. There are some people who can talk the talk or get an agent to do a business plan for them but can't cope practically. This is giving the NT agents a chance to see whether the tenants can actually farm.

Other than the wildlife couple I would say they all have a realistic idea of what they are letting themselves in for.

NT also do things a bit differently at times - one of my first jobs as an ADAS consultant was for a youngster applying for a NT share farm set up, as they had longhorn cattle on the 'tenanted' farm which was next to a period house and one of the conditions of the new share farmer was that he had to buy half the value of the herd and continue it. When he finished his 10 years, he had half the value back.

This makes it sound very rosy and I hope for the successful tenant that it is.
My experience of the management of NT farms is that they are terrible to deal with. I have not met a happy NT tenant in this area yet.
The land has been "rewilded" or told to reduce stock levels to make the farms unviable. The buildings have been sold off and the houses sold or let.
The NT Agent Giles said that the land needs to be farmed for the benefit of the wildlife, a pity the same attitude doesn't exist around here!
 

JP1

Member
Livestock Farmer
Its a tenancy. They have to put a business plan forward, more info will come out as the series progresses. NT can quiz them on their ideas and would also make clear if there was something specific they want them to do re: environmental stuff. SFI, BPS etc situation will have been made clear to tenands on asking the questions but with NT, would normally have go to the tenant.

The sheep and cattle belonged to the next door farmer and were being lent for the purposes of this exercise (they stated that in the programme). As the candidates hadn't worked with these sheep before you can't blame them for playing it safe with the bales, especially as there was some dodgy fencing in that area.

I would assume the kit was either hired from a local dealer or farmer for this exercise too.

The one couple has sold their house as they have learned from applying for previous tenancies that they need working capital to stock a farm. The vet has a smallholding at present so has some stock too.

I actually think it's an interesting approach to selecting tenants, having been through applying for a tenancy myself. There are some people who can talk the talk or get an agent to do a business plan for them but can't cope practically. This is giving the NT agents a chance to see whether the tenants can actually farm.

Other than the wildlife couple I would say they all have a realistic idea of what they are letting themselves in for.

NT also do things a bit differently at times - one of my first jobs as an ADAS consultant was for a youngster applying for a NT share farm set up, as they had longhorn cattle on the 'tenanted' farm which was next to a period house and one of the conditions of the new share farmer was that he had to buy half the value of the herd and continue it. When he finished his 10 years, he had half the value back.
Agreed

The tenants won't get the shiny tractors or livestock handling gear

On one of the trailers showed one of the candidates drenching cattle.

They're watching and observing ; skills, aptitude, opportunities

It will be fascinating who they award the place to
 

maen

Member
Location
S West
Some of the problem is the AHA system is broken with rents being almost negligible against the free market for just the house let alone the land. This has lead to massive under investment by the LL because they have no funds to invest. . Many Properties would not be able to be legally Let due to having no heating, insulation, sewage system etc etc. What started off with great intentions, and was needed, has failed to keep up with modern day realities. It might change in the autumn. In the short term there is no business plan that works in 10 years.
 

glasshouse

Member
Location
lothians
Some of the problem is the AHA system is broken with rents being almost negligible against the free market for just the house let alone the land. This has lead to massive under investment by the LL because they have no funds to invest. . Many Properties would not be able to be legally Let due to having no heating, insulation, sewage system etc etc. What started off with great intentions, and was needed, has failed to keep up with modern day realities. It might change in the autumn. In the short term there is no business plan that works in 10 years.
Nonsense
Aha system should be further strengthened and tenants given the option to buy.
A ten year tenancy is a waste of life.
 

maen

Member
Location
S West
Change of government? Although I do not think the offer to buy will be extended to NT tenants due to Crown, Church and Duchy being in similar situations. However, the principal of rolling the sale price of development land back into farm land tax free must be up for review. This is probably the only outside influence keeping land prices at the levels they are today. Couple that with the massive need to invest in sewage, water, hospital, GP surgeries that new developments seem to avoid paying for and of course social housing the hoop hole seems a done deal. No one apart from the beneficiary would be adversely effected.
 

Hilly

Member
Change of government? Although I do not think the offer to buy will be extended to NT tenants due to Crown, Church and Duchy being in similar situations. However, the principal of rolling the sale price of development land back into farm land tax free must be up for review. This is probably the only outside influence keeping land prices at the levels they are today. Couple that with the massive need to invest in sewage, water, hospital, GP surgeries that new developments seem to avoid paying for and of course social housing the hoop hole seems a done deal. No one apart from the beneficiary would be adversely effected.
Can they change AHA tenancy’s ? I doubt it
 

SFI - What % were you taking out of production?

  • 0 %

    Votes: 112 38.2%
  • Up to 25%

    Votes: 112 38.2%
  • 25-50%

    Votes: 42 14.3%
  • 50-75%

    Votes: 6 2.0%
  • 75-100%

    Votes: 4 1.4%
  • 100% I’ve had enough of farming!

    Votes: 17 5.8%

May Event: The most profitable farm diversification strategy 2024 - Mobile Data Centres

  • 3,662
  • 59
With just a internet connection and a plug socket you too can join over 70 farms currently earning up to £1.27 ppkw ~ 201% ROI

Register Here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/the-mo...2024-mobile-data-centres-tickets-871045770347

Tuesday, May 21 · 10am - 2pm GMT+1

Location: Village Hotel Bury, Rochdale Road, Bury, BL9 7BQ

The Farming Forum has teamed up with the award winning hardware manufacturer Easy Compute to bring you an educational talk about how AI and blockchain technology is helping farmers to diversify their land.

Over the past 7 years, Easy Compute have been working with farmers, agricultural businesses, and renewable energy farms all across the UK to help turn leftover space into mini data centres. With...
Top