35x multipower value

[Will 1594]

Very clean original ,not messed about with ,good tyres , one owner from new ,never been left out ,
Whats it worth

 

[two-cylinder]

Between £2500 and £15000.

 

[Flat 10]

Very clean original ,not messed about with ,good tyres , one owner from new ,never been left out ,
Whats it worth

More than I think

 

[Will 1594]

More than I think

He asked me 7500 ,it is nice , but ???

 

[SMID]

Their is one in N I, County Down .1964 very original looking, £ 8500 is the asking price.

 

[multi power]

Their is one in N I, County Down .1964 very original looking, £ 8500 is the asking price.

So would a 65 be worth more or less?

 

[multi power]

He asked me 7500 ,it is nice , but ???

That is strong money, but where could you get another one? But more importantly can you afford it and will it make you happy?

 

[two-cylinder]

So would a 65 be worth more or less?

less

 

[multi power]

less

Why, more of them ?

 

[two-cylinder]

Why, more of them ?

65's never make as much as 35's.
Just not as handy, more clumsy to drive and heavier to move about on a trailer.
If you want a tractor to participate in road runs or ploughing matches a 35 is more practical than a 65.

 

[multi power]

65's never make as much as 35's.
Just not as handy, more clumsy to drive and heavier to move about on a trailer.
If you want a tractor to participate in road runs or ploughing matches a 35 is more practical than a 65.

Yes I agree 35 is handy, however I much prefer the 65

 

[MrNoo]

I picked one up for 2,500, ran and drove but needs restoration to be nice again. A1 restored ones anything from 12k-18k apparently.

 

[SMID]

Yes I agree 35 is handy, however I much prefer the 65

Even though we had both ,35X was new 1964 and the 65 was bought at 3 yo in 1966 it was always the 65 for me even covering tatties that bit longer meant it sat as steady as a rock.

 

[Courier]

65's never make as much as 35's.
Just not as handy, more clumsy to drive and heavier to move about on a trailer.
If you want a tractor to participate in road runs or ploughing matches a 35 is more practical than a 65.

It’s all about the posing opportunities ??

 

[multi power]

Even though we had both ,35X was new 1964 and the 65 was bought at 3 yo in 1966 it was always the 65 for me even covering tatties that bit longer meant it sat as steady as a rock.

Exactly, 35 is too short
Length is the reason I love the 65, and obviously the smoother than silk 203 is a nice sound too