Netherfield
Member
- Location
- West Yorkshire
While we're on the subject,
How many bother draining the water out of the receiver regularly?
How many bother draining the water out of the receiver regularly?
right, had a bit of a look about whilst at work today.
The only think I can find relating to the law, is the pressure equipment directive,
http://www.hse.gov.uk/pressure-systems/law.htm
which calls out the following code of practice.
http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/priced/l122.pdf
As far as I can see, insurance companies are just playing it safe by saying every year or whatever, whereas, if you were bothered, and wrote a specific "written Scheme of Examination" and demonstrated your competent, you would not need to.
Other insurers, I assume either haven't got round to it, or assume that people are competent to identify a dangerous pressure vessel or pipework.
At £300 per year it would be cheaper to go on on a pressure vessel inspection course yourself and become "competent".He checked inside it, had a gadget thst checked the thickness of the skin, tested the relief valve etc, it's more than a quick look.
If you do it through NFU it's fifty quid, go direct to vulcan it's three hundred, you decide which is best value. I doubt the insurers underwriters would accept farmer Giles said its good to go still................
I can appreciate your opinion but when they write stuff like this:
===============
99 The attributes needed for competent persons who draw up or certify schemes of examination relating to minor, intermediate and major systems are shown below. (a) Minor systems. (i) Staff. At least one member of staff qualified to incorporated engineer level with adequate relevant experience and knowledge of the law, codes of practice, examination and inspection techniques and understanding of the effects of operation for the system concerned.
===============
I begin to wonder: Do many farms have a qualified engineer to hand that could 'draw up' a scheme of examination?
Could be a nice sideline in winter.At £300 per year it would be cheaper to go on on a pressure vessel inspection course yourself and become "competent".
The industry guidelines say 2 to 5 years between pressure vessel inspections is good enough (let's face it they've not all of a sudden started failing annually), yet the insurers are requiring yearly inspections. Sound like sharp practice or a good earner.
where did you find that quote?
At £300 per year it would be cheaper to go on on a pressure vessel inspection course yourself and become "competent".
The industry guidelines say 2 to 5 years between pressure vessel inspections is good enough (let's face it they've not all of a sudden started failing annually), yet the insurers are requiring yearly inspections. Sound like sharp practice or a good earner.
Your link:
http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/priced/l122.pdf
Bottom of page 30, para 99.
I can skim sh1t like that document really quick looking for sh1ttery.
Goodness that was dull.our good. i skim read, then have to skim read again, then go to the start and read it slowly before i see stuff.
I did not read it properly as i was at work today (my excuse anyway)
interesting note anyway
Lol we're all differentGoodness that was dull.