Autumn manure banned

curlietailz

Member
Arable Farmer
Location
Sedgefield
Well we’re gonna have to pile it up over winter in a field heap
Spread in spring then incorporate before drilling a spring barley or spring wheat

probably won’t need any other fertiliser then
 

Wombat

Member
BASIS
Location
East yorks
Well we’re gonna have to pile it up over winter in a field heap
Spread in spring then incorporate before drilling a spring barley or spring wheat

probably won’t need any other fertiliser then

I wouldn’t want to try and get on before spring wheat as it will be way too late. We managed to get ours spread this year and the spring barley drilled Easter weekend but that was only as it turned nice and dry in a wet year we could end up spreading late April
 

Grass And Grain

Member
Mixed Farmer
Location
Yorks
We've all been told (at least in NVZ's), to do a whole farm N production calculation for N from organic manure. Think it has to be below 170kgN/ha. I'd imagine many are up to that limit.

Max spreading limit is what? 250kg/ha.

Only time heavy, low lying land farms can practically get on is after harvest, or on a frost (not really allowed either).

Any small areas that might go in spring will take farmer way over the 250kg/ha limit. And said farmer will probably break the soil protection rulesby travelling when too wet and causing compaction/ruts.

We'll have to write down a post harvest catch crop of short term N capturing self-sown cereal volunteers.

Another case of, if it's written down correctly it will probably pass the inspector.

If sewage cake gets a derogation, then it's a fudge.

I thought only 10% of the N is available to growing crop anyway, which means 90% will be there for the NEXT winter. So is there really all so much point in disallowing autumb applications? Admittedly that 10% is probably quite soluble.

That said, I thought cultivated in (as would be applied in autumn) was better for ammonia capture. Spring top dressed very bad for ammonia release.
 

Grass And Grain

Member
Mixed Farmer
Location
Yorks
No, if 10% is available to the next/current crop then 5% is available to the following one. Don’t confuse Total N with Available N.
Ok, yes you're right, I made a rookie error saying 90% will be available for next crop.

I'll try and articulate more succinctly.

So 10% might be reasonably immediately available. EA don't want that applied in autumn, as they're saying it might leach. They're asking us to apply it in spring when the crop can use that 10%.

Let's say we make an application each spring.

If, as you say, 5% is available each year after the initial application, that takes say 20 years to slowly become available at 5% per year (not perfect maths, but stick with it).

So I've been applying FYM each year for past 20 years. That means there is 20 years of applications providing about 5% each of available N per year. That's equivalent of 100% of a single application being made available. Some of that will be in summer, and some over winter (maybe more in summer than winter, but still possibly a significant dollop over winter).

Are the EA worrying about that 10% from the immediate application, when a bigger amount is actually coming available from the historic applications?

Therefore, is the difference made between either an autumn or spring application relatively insignificant?
 

Brisel

Member
Arable Farmer
Location
Midlands
Ok, yes you're right, I made a rookie error saying 90% will be available for next crop.

I'll try and articulate more succinctly.

So 10% might be reasonably immediately available. EA don't want that applied in autumn, as they're saying it might leach. They're asking us to apply it in spring when the crop can use that 10%.

Let's say we make an application each spring.

If, as you say, 5% is available each year after the initial application, that takes say 20 years to slowly become available at 5% per year (not perfect maths, but stick with it).

So I've been applying FYM each year for past 20 years. That means there is 20 years of applications providing about 5% each of available N per year. That's equivalent of 100% of a single application being made available. Some of that will be in summer, and some over winter (maybe more in summer than winter, but still possibly a significant dollop over winter).

Are the EA worrying about that 10% from the immediate application, when a bigger amount is actually coming available from the historic applications?

Therefore, is the difference made between either an autumn or spring application relatively insignificant?

You are applying logic. That has no place in the EA…! I fail to understand why they want to swap leaching for airborne emissions, but here we are.

More seriously, what you describe is less common in arable but quite common in intensive livestock. I would be interested to see which emits more nitrates, but suspect it’s the intensive livestock applying slurry to every acre every year in higher rainfall areas that grow better grass.
 

czechmate

Member
Mixed Farmer
Ok, yes you're right, I made a rookie error saying 90% will be available for next crop.

I'll try and articulate more succinctly.

So 10% might be reasonably immediately available. EA don't want that applied in autumn, as they're saying it might leach. They're asking us to apply it in spring when the crop can use that 10%.

Let's say we make an application each spring.

If, as you say, 5% is available each year after the initial application, that takes say 20 years to slowly become available at 5% per year (not perfect maths, but stick with it).

So I've been applying FYM each year for past 20 years. That means there is 20 years of applications providing about 5% each of available N per year. That's equivalent of 100% of a single application being made available. Some of that will be in summer, and some over winter (maybe more in summer than winter, but still possibly a significant dollop over winter).

Are the EA worrying about that 10% from the immediate application, when a bigger amount is actually coming available from the historic applications?

Therefore, is the difference made between either an autumn or spring application relatively insignificant?


It’s a nice idea that muck applied 20 years ago is still providing N but I am sure that that has long gone.
 

SFI - What % were you taking out of production?

  • 0 %

    Votes: 105 40.5%
  • Up to 25%

    Votes: 94 36.3%
  • 25-50%

    Votes: 39 15.1%
  • 50-75%

    Votes: 5 1.9%
  • 75-100%

    Votes: 3 1.2%
  • 100% I’ve had enough of farming!

    Votes: 13 5.0%

May Event: The most profitable farm diversification strategy 2024 - Mobile Data Centres

  • 1,708
  • 32
With just a internet connection and a plug socket you too can join over 70 farms currently earning up to £1.27 ppkw ~ 201% ROI

Register Here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/the-mo...2024-mobile-data-centres-tickets-871045770347

Tuesday, May 21 · 10am - 2pm GMT+1

Location: Village Hotel Bury, Rochdale Road, Bury, BL9 7BQ

The Farming Forum has teamed up with the award winning hardware manufacturer Easy Compute to bring you an educational talk about how AI and blockchain technology is helping farmers to diversify their land.

Over the past 7 years, Easy Compute have been working with farmers, agricultural businesses, and renewable energy farms all across the UK to help turn leftover space into mini data centres. With...
Top