Baler PTO speed

tinman

Member
Location
Ulster
I don't know what kind of baler your asking about but in my case I run the round baler in 540 eco between 600 and 650 rpm, in most grass she runs smoother at them speeds.
 
Last edited:

KB6930

Member
Location
Borders
I have to run in eco with my v660 or the clutch will kick out too much with the tractor at higher revs but in eco it usually pulls the tractor back a bit first
 

DrDunc

Member
Mixed Farmer
I was going to ask, does nobody bale on steep ground, because reversing to put a bale out on steep ground kills the engine, at low revs!
Depends upon the engine a bit maybe?

Run mine at 1800rpm which means the baler is running about 590rpm.

The engine is pretty much constant power between 1550 and 2100 rpm, so yes you've to watch reversing to cross hills, but it's still the same power as standard 540, just not as wide a power band.

Other engine brands can have the power band between say 2200 and 1800rpm. With these in 540e running just below 1800rpm, you're already out of the peak power and onto a falling torque output. They could struggle reversing uphill?

Or maybe it's just how often you're used to reversing uphill to place a bale. With ground like mine, you get a lot of practice. :rolleyes::cry::LOL:




My other thought on the matter is while the tractor engine may not be at its peak output, for the same horse power the baler input torque is lower running at 600rpm than when at 540.
 

Frankzy

Member
Location
Jamtland, Sweden
I was going to ask, does nobody bale on steep ground, because reversing to put a bale out on steep ground kills the engine, at low revs!

We bale a few fields that are steep enough to use as skiing hills in the winter but I've never had a problem with reversing while in 540 eco with the mf 7495's.
We even did a field like that with a Deutz 6160.4 once and while you certainly missed the longer wheelbase and weight of the 7495 the Deutz had no lack of power in 540 eco...
 
McHale rep told me that the claas 354 we have spins the bale faster to make up for having less rollers and takes more power and fuel. Then said to run the McHale at 600 to 620 to do a good job,which defeated the object,I thought. Just to confuse things,ours is on 1000 pto
 

sawdust

Member
Location
Argyll
McHale rep told me that the claas 354 we have spins the bale faster to make up for having less rollers and takes more power and fuel. Then said to run the McHale at 600 to 620 to do a good job,which defeated the object,I thought. Just to confuse things,ours is on 1000 pto
I worked a 355 a couple of weeks ago, it too was 1000 pto but the pickup seemed faster than the 255 on 570 pto.
 

tinman

Member
Location
Ulster
I was going to ask, does nobody bale on steep ground, because reversing to put a bale out on steep ground kills the engine, at low revs!
It all depends on how many horses you have in front of the baler, low HP in eco and you will notice it on a hill alright, you'll miss the weight too.
I have 170, if they are all standing, on a vario transmission so a hill doesn't really bother them too much.
 

wdah/him

Member
Location
tyrone
I normally run the mchale here at about 480-500rpm, standard shaft as I have no eco, haven't had problems apart from on hills but it is only on a mf 6180.

roundpack was run at 420, find need the extra revs for the McHale, what benefit would I get running the McHale at 600rpm
 

Will you help clear snow?

  • yes

    Votes: 70 32.0%
  • no

    Votes: 149 68.0%

The London Palladium event “BPR Seminar”

  • 15,000
  • 234
This is our next step following the London rally 🚜

BPR is not just a farming issue, it affects ALL business, it removes incentive to invest for growth

Join us @LondonPalladium on the 16th for beginning of UK business fight back👍

Back
Top