- Location
- the brecks norfolk
Good point, I didnt think of that. It seemed a rather meagre number, not the sort of numbers government take much notice off sadly[emoji26]How many beet growers are there? I signed it
Good point, I didnt think of that. It seemed a rather meagre number, not the sort of numbers government take much notice off sadly[emoji26]How many beet growers are there? I signed it
If they don't listen to British Sugar and it's parent company and their political connections, I don't really think a few farmers signing a petition is going to sway it?Good point, I didnt think of that. It seemed a rather meagre number, not the sort of numbers government take much notice off sadly[emoji26]
How many beet growers are there? I signed it
It feels to me that it is merely a token effort on the part of nfusugar. The neonic ban and the consequences of it are well known and have been for some time. Last year we (the growers) got away with it, this year not.I've just has a email through about the letter being sent to the secretary of state about reinstating neonics and I was a bit shocked to see only 1025 growers had signed it.
Everyone is belle acheing about the beet job(rightly so) but why haven't more growers signed it. The only way for a change is to make as much noise about it as possible
I don't mean so sound like a broken record but that is typical of NFU sugar, as ive previously said when discussing beet pricing they are just completely pee useless.It feels to me that it is merely a token effort on the part of nfusugar. The neonic ban and the consequences of it are well known and have been for some time. Last year we (the growers) got away with it, this year not.
The nfu sugar committee should have been shouting from the minute we knew yields were going to suffer. Not after BS have applied for a derogation.
Why don't you put yourself up to be a grower rep? I'll vote for you. In other news my first lift had sugars in the mid 16s. Second lift mid 15sI don't mean so sound like a broken record but that is typical of NFU sugar, as ive previously said when discussing beet pricing they are just completely pee useless.
Yet we still have to keep paying them via the levy.
Unfortunately it seems that many of organisations who supposedly represent us aren't fit for purpose. Nepotism on a grand scale.I don't mean so sound like a broken record but that is typical of NFU sugar, as ive previously said when discussing beet pricing they are just completely pee useless.
Yet we still have to keep paying them via the levy.
Don't really know why they want to keep it a secret either? Do more good getting the facts across to the press with the effects on farms, jobs, loss of habitat created by the beet crop, food for the swans etc. If it gets the ok, it will look like a massive cover up by the evil farmers. If it does not get the ok, it will still look like a cover up.I've just has a email through about the letter being sent to the secretary of state about reinstating neonics and I was a bit shocked to see only 1025 growers had signed it.
Everyone is belle acheing about the beet job(rightly so) but why haven't more growers signed it. The only way for a change is to make as much noise about it as possible
Fresh blood is needed but I fear its too late.Why don't you put yourself up to be a grower rep? I'll vote for you. In other news my first lift had sugars in the mid 16s. Second lift mid 15s
My opinion is that bad cercospora is not getting the blame it should be in amongst all this yellows chat. We need fungicides that work ASAP.
We need to know how they manage it on the continent. My understanding was that epoxiconazole was the best azole but that's now gone. I've had 2 crops very badly affected by it in the last 2 years.Unfortunately I dont think it matters who is voted onto the board, infact they have a lot of very good individuals already its the whole NFU mantra which causes the whole sugar board to loss there bite.
I completely agree @flat10, regards cercospora, it's a relatively new and under rated disease in the uk but is going to become the buggy in the next few years. There isnt any fungicide that's particularly strong on it and this year theres some beet fields locally that have been burnt to a crisp by the disease.
You've hit the nail on the head, the individual who put themselves up all have a lot of good ideas and ambition to improve things when you read there biography in the voting pack but once they're voted on they all seem to become muted and wrapped in cotton wool or just political bullpoo(call it what you like) and nothing changes and everything just bumbles along like it has since the inception of the sugar board.....its sad for those who put themselves forward and for the growers who put there hope in them.Fresh blood is needed but I fear its too late.
It takes years to infiltrate into these committees. Years of blindingly dull meetings and arse licking. I could stick the meetings but I won't pretend to like or agree with people I don't. It's not for me.
We need to know how they manage it on the continent. My understanding was that epoxiconazole was the best azole but that's now gone. I've had 2 crops very badly affected by it in the last 2 years.
Unfortunately I dont think it matters who is voted onto the board, infact they have a lot of very good individuals already its the whole NFU mantra which causes the whole sugar board to loss there bite.
I completely agree @flat10, regards cercospora, it's a relatively new and under rated disease in the uk but is going to become the buggy in the next few years. There isnt any fungicide that's particularly strong on it and this year theres some beet fields locally that have been burnt to a crisp by the disease.
Next lump did 71 ,adjusted 16.6 , 6 % tareFirst 50 acre just gone in 64 ton 16,4 sugar light flinty sand and one patch of heavy shire
Hope 47 acre what lifted yesterday does better , should do it’s off some nice silt