Complete farce

hoff135

Member
Location
scotland
Constantly hearing that we need to plant more trees to save the world. At this very moment network rail sub contractors are felling dozens of 100 year old plus broadleaf trees up to 20 yards from the track. The wood is shredded and dumped and the stumps poisoned so they cant grow back. These were growing beside a field a provided a valuable wind break and habitat. Now it will be completely windswept and barren. No tree has ever fallen on the track here. Seeing it happen in other locations to. Utter disgrace...
 

MrNoo

Member
Arable Farmer
Location
Cirencester
Same with our local Council, old avenues of trees planted back in the 60's have all been felled due to H & S, hardly see a tree in town now unless on private property
 

hoff135

Member
Location
scotland
Dont think its ash die back. Its a mix of elm, sycamore, ash, beach etc. Theyve been growing there since the railway was build a hundred odd years ago. I did hear its because they want no trees within a 100m of a bridge or something but cant verify this.
 
Location
southwest
Read the Anton Coaker articles. Trees only lock up carbon during the first few years of growth. Once mature, they stop locking up carbon. So to be useful in carbon harvesting, they need felling and replacing with younger trees. But if you burn the wood, you're freeing the carbon anyway so there is no overall gain.
 

pembsarable

Member
Mixed Farmer
Location
Pembrokeshire
Our local railway line is shut for the next 5 weeks as Network Rail are clearing all vegetation from alongside the railway line a distance of 8 meters or to the boundary fencing. Trees, shrubs, bushes - all being destroyed.
 
Constantly hearing that we need to plant more trees to save the world. At this very moment network rail sub contractors are felling dozens of 100 year old plus broadleaf trees up to 20 yards from the track. The wood is shredded and dumped and the stumps poisoned so they cant grow back. These were growing beside a field a provided a valuable wind break and habitat. Now it will be completely windswept and barren. No tree has ever fallen on the track here. Seeing it happen in other locations to. Utter disgrace...

You want to see the destruction in the name of HS2. And there’s plenty more to come.
 

hoff135

Member
Location
scotland
Read the Anton Coaker articles. Trees only lock up carbon during the first few years of growth. Once mature, they stop locking up carbon. So to be useful in carbon harvesting, they need felling and replacing with younger trees. But if you burn the wood, you're freeing the carbon anyway so there is no overall gain.

They seem to be shredding it so i guess the carbon will be released over time and theres no new trees being planted. The stumps have been drilled and poisoned. Big lump of a diesel chipper and digger running just for added carbon release.

Trees would have been there all the 20th century when the line (north of Scotland) was far busier than now and everyone seemed to manage fine.
 

TheTallGuy

Member
Location
Cambridgeshire
In days gone by, the lengthsmen & gangers would have kept vegetation trimmed back, as would the small lineside fires cause by hot clinker escaping the firebox & chimney. In the latter days of BR & into Railtrack such things ended up being managed in a reactionary way. This has lead to numerous incidents of trains striking fallen trees & branches, massive wheelslip problems during leaf fall with attendant damage to wheelsets & track. There's also the issue that these trees can undermine the formation/solum causing flooding issues & track stability problems along with landslips etc.

I often see some of the figures published of just how much all these problems cost Network Rail (& hence the taxpayers) - that's before you take into account the cost to the wider economy - we're talking about tens of millions of pounds per year.

As a final thought - what would folk be saying if a tree/branch fell & there was a major crash with loss of life? I suspect NR would be getting a roasting for not managing the vegetation!
 

glasshouse

Member
Location
lothians
What about this, ? hedge destruction funded by the taxpayer
A99DF0B0-6367-4908-A7BD-0A4EC40A07C5.jpeg
 

Danllan

Member
Location
Sir Gar / Carms
Read the Anton Coaker articles. Trees only lock up carbon during the first few years of growth. Once mature, they stop locking up carbon. So to be useful in carbon harvesting, they need felling and replacing with younger trees. But if you burn the wood, you're freeing the carbon anyway so there is no overall gain.

Burn half, let the rest take its time to decompose. Can't help thinking that if the thousands of miles of road and rail sides were coppiced it would be a win win situation for all.
 

J 1177

Member
Mixed Farmer
Location
Durham, UK
I was sat a couple of months ago cutting beans listening to the latest BBC drivel on how farming is destroying the world you know the usual guff, then looked across about 800 yards away to the best part of 300 acres of former farmland, hedges, trees, water courses that had been destroyed to put the biggest fecking monstrosity you've ever seen plus a few houses. The monstrosity? A six story Amazon wharehouse the light polution from it on a night is so bad the pikies can't even lamp properly (does have its advantages then). A mass of steel and concrete all in the name of consumer greed and I'm the one destroying the environment.......hmmmm. :banghead::rolleyes:
 

Will you help clear snow?

  • yes

    Votes: 71 32.0%
  • no

    Votes: 151 68.0%

The London Palladium event “BPR Seminar”

  • 15,103
  • 234
This is our next step following the London rally 🚜

BPR is not just a farming issue, it affects ALL business, it removes incentive to invest for growth

Join us @LondonPalladium on the 16th for beginning of UK business fight back👍

Back
Top