£10.50 a hectare dummyNothing on here makes sence to me other than if you follow the recommendation aplication rate then Hi Load works out at £7.50/acre and the weaker stuff £10.50/acre
£10.50 a hectare dummyNothing on here makes sence to me other than if you follow the recommendation aplication rate then Hi Load works out at £7.50/acre and the weaker stuff £10.50/acre
Galgone 2 LYou've lost me , we only put .75 l / ha of 200g fluroxpyr on cereals ,
2 l / ha is high rate imo , £10.50 ha
If 5 L cost £65 and it does 2.5 hectare how can that cost £10. 50 hectare ? If you are using 2 lites hectare when its cost £13/litre£10.50 a hectare dummy
ffs , don't you read the posts on here .If 5 L cost £65 and it does 2.5 hectare how can that cost £10. 50 hectare ? If you are using 2 lites hectare when its cost £13/litre
They are comparing apples to oranges on some of the actives in the chemical. Some are the acid equivalent (whatever that means) and some are the methyl Ester equivalent. They are different strengths which when compared shows that hiload is cheapest if you ignore the label and put it on stronger than they say you're allowed to, galgone is more expensive than a generic
Aint interested in post . Just cost of product and what it says on the label. I would around in circles otherwiseffs , don't you read the posts on here .
Ive used hi load on docks for a few years as it works out £4 acre chesper that the weeker equivalent thats price at £65for 5 l on herePut it on and see what happens , I have no experience of hi load . killing docks is a piece of cake .
Why are you asking then , galgone is £52 a pop , not £65Ive used hi load on docks for a few years as it works out £4 acre chesper that the weeker equivalent thats price at £65for 5 l on here
Just checking if anyone had a better optionWhy are you asking then , galgone is £52 a pop , not £65
What's recommended rate for hi load ?Just checking if anyone had a better option
Dockstar and Hi Load worked about the same last year except Hi Load is a fraction of the cost . Be interesting to see how it works 2cd yearSpraying cereals is a bit different compared to grass- in grass the weeds are usually from rootstock, not from seed and even if they were you have SU chemistry and all sorts to clean them up. In grassland you are talking about a weed that is perennial, with sizeable root mass and its often growing very hard or covered by grass itself. Different ball game to spraying a typical crop where weeds have been weakened by ploughing or round up or pre-em chemistry anyway.
I do not know if hi-load will be more effective on docks compared to other products giving the full 400g/ha but I do know the formulation in hi-load is pretty horny- in mixture with other things it does seem to hot mixtures up a treat.
For whatever reason Dow put more than just fluroxypyr in doxstar. I know triclopyr is an active that tends to translocate very readily and attacks anything with a good root on it hence my suggestion of adding it to regular hurler or whatever.
Most of the products mentioned on this thread will do a better job on docks than regular MCPA or Polo at any rate.
Dockstar and Hi Load worked about the same last year except Hi Load is a fraction of the cost . Be interesting to see how it works 2cd year
I would not mind paying for Dockstar if it took them out 1st year but its no where near doing that
i
Whats 6 star and its says on the Label . Grass seeds crops new leyJust an update:
starane hi-load doesn’t have a recommendation for grass anymore..... want us to buy six star apparently.
Whats 6 star and its says on the Label . Grass seeds crops new ley
sorry, auto correct...... doxstar
says new ley on the label so it isn't strong enough for established docks...... shows in your table above that 1l generic 200g/ fluroxypyr equals 0.6l starane hi-load. Not strong enough. You need 1.2l of h-load to match generic stuff at 2l/ha which isn't on the label.
Just an update:
starane hi-load doesn’t have a recommendation for grass anymore..... want us to buy six star apparently.