ollie989898
Member
Iran's goal is to get US troops out of the region entirely I think.
That's one possibility, but their fundamental aim is to be the regional power (broker). If there is a reduced US presence and they can achieve that aim, it would not be a bad thing from their perspective.Iran's goal is to get US troops out of the region entirely I think.
What was the time?, a ballistic missile doesn't know what's in its arc of flight.Seems like it’s all kicking off. The plane crash is either a horrid coincidence or else one of Iran’s enemies is escalating things further. I suspect American involvement, but I guess we will never know the truth.
Or the Iranians shot it down by mistake?
That’s what the Americans are now saying. It may be right, when I think about it more, but who knows and who will ever know what the truth is?
Flight radar lost the tracking data for the plane from 3 tracking stations at the same instant in the air. If the plane was going down due to pilot error or engine failure etc it would continue sending out the tracking data as it fell from the sky.
The fact it stopped sending the data means a catastrophic failure must have occured, such as a missile blowing the aircraft apart in midair.
Seems that way - I guess the big question is who was the team that fired the missile. As I see it, both sides had an incentive and both sides have reason not to admit they’ve done it.
Anyone thinking this is US action is an idiot. It was clearly an Iranian air defence missile that was, almost certainly, fired at what was assumed to be a hostile aircraft. I loathe the Iranian regime but I don't for a moment think that it deliberately ordered a civilian airliner to be shot down in the airspace of its own capital.
Seems that way - I guess the big question is who was the team that fired the missile. As I see it, both sides had an incentive and both sides have reason not to admit they’ve done it.
Assuming it wasn't an equipment error or that a subordinate went rogue, the battery commander would have had the decision - probably a Captain. The Vincennes was commanded by a f^ckwit with a reputation for being gung-ho.I will be so brave to say just an accident? A jittery local air defence commanding officer?. I am not a military person, so have no idea about a chain of command in making such launch decisions.
But if I recall incident with the USS Vincennes it was the ship commander that ultimately took the decision to shoot down Iran Air flight 655. And then the US authorities spent a few weeks in denial and laying a false trail before the truth came out.
But that is by the by. All very sad.
Assuming it wasn't an equipment error or that a subordinate went rogue, the battery commander would have had the decision - probably a Captain. The Vincennes was commanded by a f^ckwit with a reputation for being gung-ho.
The politics of the situation don't bode well for any hopes that battery commander may have for a gong.A wouldn't fancy being in his shoes atm. Having said that, didn't the Captain of the Vincennes get a medal for his incompetence?
What an excellent idea.NATOME FFS, he's as mad as "box of frogs" but makes for funny viewing.
https://www.euronews.com/2020/01/10...to-expanded-to-middle-east-and-renamed-natome