Eat less meat

delilah

Member
I agree with you.
It is also the case that their results are artificially low because of hormones.
If we could use hormones I feel our emissions would be lower than theres.

Which emissions ? Manmade climate change emissions ? Because they are the only ones this is all about.
Our cows don't produce any of them, and neither do yours (y) .
Could someone please, please explain this to the NFU ?
 

delilah

Member
Back to the OP. I have just listened again to yesterdays programme to get the accurate quote.
Kath Dalmeny: "there's pretty much a consensus now between all of the food and farming organizations that we need to eat less meat". And she is correct. NFU ? tick. AHDB ? tick.
All the slagging off of the media that goes on on here, it is just shooting the messenger.
 
Which emissions ? Manmade climate change emissions ? Because they are the only ones this is all about.
Our cows don't produce any of them, and neither do yours (y) .
Could someone please, please explain this to the NFU ?

I'm sorry but they do have manmade C02 emissions from the fossil fuel derived inputs used. This could be a very low percentage - but not zero - for stock kept outside on unfertilised forage. To very high or 100% for stock kept on fertilised grazing and fed indoors.

I agree totally that the NFU have accepted not challenged the methane issue.
 

thorpe

Member
think about this one, shut yourself in a garage with a car with the engine running and they will carry you out in the morning. get shut in the same garage with 6 suck paps and youll walk out,but you might be a bit shat up!
 

honeyend

Member
There are large amounts of natural methane production that man has little control over, when you get people talking about methane from farmed cattle, who ever is being interviewed should have these figures off pat, and the fact UK farming produces very towards the world total. If they haven't got one they should a prepared strap line that they say over and over again, that what politicians do, and they manage to sell things that are not true.
It should be also pointed out that farmers produce what the supermarkets and food outlets want to sell, and meat, often processed meat has become a snack, and not a main part of the meal. If they thought the price of the McD's or chicken nuggets was going to increase, somehow its always about cattle, perhaps there would be a more balanced discussion.
The worst thing is targets, because often in the effort to meet targets, to get grants things are done that in the long run, that are not really sustainable, and end up being counterproductive.
 

Muck Spreader

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
Limousin
Which emissions ? Manmade climate change emissions ? Because they are the only ones this is all about.
Our cows don't produce any of them, and neither do yours (y) .
Could someone please, please explain this to the NFU ?

The best thing the NFU could do is rebrand itself something like Tory MP's do and become the Environmental Research Group. Gives it a far more nuanced and balanced look to the public. :D
 

Agrivator

Member
What about the poor misguided Swiss country dwellers. They have spent generations exposed to the Methane percolating through the floor from the cows housed below.

It's no wonder that the only thing they're famous for is the Cuckoo Clock - even though it was a German invention ( at least according to Stephen Fry). But he actually spouts more boll ocks than me.
 

kiwi pom

Member
Location
canterbury NZ
Which emissions ? Manmade climate change emissions ? Because they are the only ones this is all about.
Our cows don't produce any of them, and neither do yours (y) .
Could someone please, please explain this to the NFU ?

Beef production does have emissions, forget about the animal its everything else. Sheds, concrete, diesel, machinery and all the emissions generated from any crops that are also fed to the animal.
It's the systems that don't stack up well. As an example the farm my brother works on in Cheshire finishes cattle for a supermarket. A few weeks ago they combined the maize as the clamps were full, hauled it to the yard and instead of putting it through a roller mill, ran it through a contractors SP forager that was set up to do it. It's then stored and fed in a TMR to the permanently housed cattle. The emissions from all that goes onto the animal and that's just one ingredient of the ration. He's not the only one with an intensive system either. Having a maize paddock meant he didn't need a grass paddock but the maize is still part of the system.
The guy may also be an NFU member so they have to protect him too.
I'm not saying other foods don't have an impact, they may be worse, but cattle farming does have an environmental footprint.
 

delilah

Member
Beef production does have emissions, forget about the animal its everything else. Sheds, concrete, diesel, machinery and all the emissions generated from any crops that are also fed to the animal.
It's the systems that don't stack up well. As an example the farm my brother works on in Cheshire finishes cattle for a supermarket. A few weeks ago they combined the maize as the clamps were full, hauled it to the yard and instead of putting it through a roller mill, ran it through a contractors SP forager that was set up to do it. It's then stored and fed in a TMR to the permanently housed cattle. The emissions from all that goes onto the animal and that's just one ingredient of the ration. He's not the only one with an intensive system either. Having a maize paddock meant he didn't need a grass paddock but the maize is still part of the system.
The guy may also be an NFU member so they have to protect him too.
I'm not saying other foods don't have an impact, they may be worse, but cattle farming does have an environmental footprint.

Nah.
I have worked with cattle that never went out, and I have worked with cattle that never came in.
What they have in common is this: You could move all of the cattle in the UK to one end of the spectrum, and you could move them all to the other, and in neither instance would the man made greenhouse gas emissions of the UK change one iota. There is nothing wrong our side of the farm gate.
 

Poorbuthappy

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
Devon
Nah.
I have worked with cattle that never went out, and I have worked with cattle that never came in.
What they have in common is this: You could move all of the cattle in the UK to one end of the spectrum, and you could move them all to the other, and in neither instance would the man made greenhouse gas emissions of the UK change one iota. There is nothing wrong our side of the farm gate.
What a ridiculous statement
 

Poorbuthappy

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
Devon
You want to expand on that ?
Perhaps we can agree methane from ruminants is merely part of a natural cycle, with no net gain of ghg.
However, if we're gonna criticise fossil fuel usage in importing produce, how can fossil fuel usage within ag not be an issue? To say there are no improvements to be made on that front is simply sticking your fingers in your ears and going "La la la" imo.
 

Hjwise

Member
Mixed Farmer
I’ve read that about 1% of the worlds fossils fuels goes in to producing nitrogen fert. I’ve also read that the internet consumes about 6% of the world’s electricity of which about 60% is produced using fossil fuels. So, would we better off focusing on reducing social media usage than eating less meat? I don’t know, I’m not a mathematician.
 

Sid

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
South Molton
I’ve read that about 1% of the worlds fossils fuels goes in to producing nitrogen fert. I’ve also read that the internet consumes about 6% of the world’s electricity of which about 60% is produced using fossil fuels. So, would we better off focusing on reducing social media usage than eating less meat? I don’t know, I’m not a mathematician.
But electricity is green. Just look @Clive Green car.

Electricity is like beef, its not about the product but about how its produced!
 

DaveGrohl

Member
Mixed Farmer
Location
Cumbria
I’ve read that about 1% of the worlds fossils fuels goes in to producing nitrogen fert. I’ve also read that the internet consumes about 6% of the world’s electricity of which about 60% is produced using fossil fuels. So, would we better off focusing on reducing social media usage than eating less meat? I don’t know, I’m not a mathematician.
Should people be looking at themselves as part of the problem or should they be blaming someone else cos it's easy? I dunno, I'm not a psychologist.
 

Hjwise

Member
Mixed Farmer
A ‘real’ net zero would require a colossal change in behavior. Everyone making a small change just isn’t going to cut it. We are all the problem. Until we stop taking fossil fuels out the ground not a great deal is going to change.
 

delilah

Member
Perhaps we can agree methane from ruminants is merely part of a natural cycle, with no net gain of ghg.
However, if we're gonna criticise fossil fuel usage in importing produce, how can fossil fuel usage within ag not be an issue? To say there are no improvements to be made on that front is simply sticking your fingers in your ears and going "La la la" imo.

Not what I said.
Lets say that UK plc produces, for arguments sake, 100 t of manmade greenhouse gasses each year.
On 1st Jan, lets bring all of the cattle indoors for a year. What will the figure be next year ? 100 t.
Then on 1st Jan 2022 lets kick all the cattle out for a year. What will the figure be ? 100 t.
That's what I said.


Eat locally sourced meat.

Quite.
Different issue. Other side of the farm gate.
 

SFI - What % were you taking out of production?

  • 0 %

    Votes: 105 40.5%
  • Up to 25%

    Votes: 94 36.3%
  • 25-50%

    Votes: 39 15.1%
  • 50-75%

    Votes: 5 1.9%
  • 75-100%

    Votes: 3 1.2%
  • 100% I’ve had enough of farming!

    Votes: 13 5.0%

May Event: The most profitable farm diversification strategy 2024 - Mobile Data Centres

  • 1,817
  • 32
With just a internet connection and a plug socket you too can join over 70 farms currently earning up to £1.27 ppkw ~ 201% ROI

Register Here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/the-mo...2024-mobile-data-centres-tickets-871045770347

Tuesday, May 21 · 10am - 2pm GMT+1

Location: Village Hotel Bury, Rochdale Road, Bury, BL9 7BQ

The Farming Forum has teamed up with the award winning hardware manufacturer Easy Compute to bring you an educational talk about how AI and blockchain technology is helping farmers to diversify their land.

Over the past 7 years, Easy Compute have been working with farmers, agricultural businesses, and renewable energy farms all across the UK to help turn leftover space into mini data centres. With...
Top