- Location
- Ceredigion
You may be correct I dont know but if every doctor consultant and heart Surgeon disagrees with you would someone listen to a farmer if you are a farmer. you may be a qualified health expert for all i know , what medical experience do you have , all i can say its the advice they gave me when i thought i was at deaths door as clearly worked , i could not have cycled 100 miles a week before i had my attackThe whole cholesterol thing is being proven to be a monumental red herring the way they've viewed it in the past. Foods that do actually crudely raise cholesterol are the ones which are protective of human health in many cases. That's because the measures of cholesterol used in the past are the wrong measures. We now know far more about the details of cholesterol, even though many in the medical profession are oblivious to recent advances. Proper cholesterol profiling does indicate health problems but this involves much greater analysis than the standard total, LDL, HDL and triglycerides estimation. Indeed, from that simple analysis it's the HDL and triglycerides that are far more indicative of risk. Total and crude LDL measurement need consigning to the dustbin of history. Measures like C-reactive protein are being shown to be more important anyway.
However, your post is mostly correct. I'd just fine tune it by inserting the words extra virgin in front of olive oil (which is a great food for health) and remove the lean fatty in front of meats. Oh, and stop being scared of dairy since the actual evidence (rather than the hype) points to it being protective.