Fake Food, Fake Meat, interesting article.

delilah

Member
I got as far as Industrial Agriculture is responsible for 50% of greenhouse gasses then lost interest.

Yes, that's clearly wrong. Not putting words in her mouth but she may justify it as describing the industrialized food system in its broadest sense, including transportation etc, but still a stretch to justify that figure.
Do try to read beyond that though, she makes important points.
 

Yale

Member
Livestock Farmer
Will the Chinese people - frightened by covid-19 and the fake links being made between it and eating meat by anti-meat propagandists - be allowed to read sense like this article?

Fake meat is already being pushed hard in China, from what I gleaned on BBC business, 23/4/20:

They won’t worry about being thinned out a bit through bad nutrition.

Plenty more!
 

Steevo

Member
Location
Gloucestershire
I think the glyphosate link is a little weak.

It’s easy to knock a system that exists. Not so easy to suggest how it could actually be improved upon.

Industrial food, fake meat etc is certainly bad for the human race and our health. It’s also a shocking waste of resources whilst claiming to be the opposite.

Yet the world we live in also has an obsession with cheap food which has to be produced on a massive scale to achieve this, hence fertilisers etc.

Value food, everything else will follow.

Pointing a finger at agriculture without asking “how did we get here?” is what today’s world is based on.

We all have a responsibility.
 

Agrivator

Member
I became a bit concerned when she claimed:

''It uses 75% of the land, yet industrial agriculture based on fossil fuel intensive, chemical intensive monocultures, produces only 30% of the food we eat. Meanwhile, small, biodiverse farms using 25% of the land provide 70% of the food. At this rate, if the share of industrial agriculture and industrial food in our diet is increased to 45%, we will have a dead planet. One with with no life and no food. ''

By my calculation, she reckons that small diverse farms are 7 times more productive/unit area, than intensive farms that use fossil fuels and chemicals.

Obviously we should look at the merits of reverting to using oxen, together with women and child labour. Particularly when you look at the cost of new tractors and telehandlers compared to the price of beef, milk, wheat and rice.
 

delilah

Member
Pointing a finger at agriculture without asking “how did we get here?” is what today’s world is based on.

100%.
I don't think she is actually pointing a finger at 'industrial agriculture'. She repeatedly uses that phrase, possibly because, as you suggest, it is an easy way of getting the reading public to nod along in agreement.
Rather, what she is actually pointing the finger at is 'the control of agriculture'.
 

SFI - What % were you taking out of production?

  • 0 %

    Votes: 105 40.9%
  • Up to 25%

    Votes: 93 36.2%
  • 25-50%

    Votes: 39 15.2%
  • 50-75%

    Votes: 5 1.9%
  • 75-100%

    Votes: 3 1.2%
  • 100% I’ve had enough of farming!

    Votes: 12 4.7%

May Event: The most profitable farm diversification strategy 2024 - Mobile Data Centres

  • 1,652
  • 32
With just a internet connection and a plug socket you too can join over 70 farms currently earning up to £1.27 ppkw ~ 201% ROI

Register Here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/the-mo...2024-mobile-data-centres-tickets-871045770347

Tuesday, May 21 · 10am - 2pm GMT+1

Location: Village Hotel Bury, Rochdale Road, Bury, BL9 7BQ

The Farming Forum has teamed up with the award winning hardware manufacturer Easy Compute to bring you an educational talk about how AI and blockchain technology is helping farmers to diversify their land.

Over the past 7 years, Easy Compute have been working with farmers, agricultural businesses, and renewable energy farms all across the UK to help turn leftover space into mini data centres. With...
Top