- Location
- South east
I let a few units in the side of a barn for small businesses/ individuals needing space.
Currently I draw up my own licences based on one I had a solicitor do for me a few years ago, I have always had a clause in the licence requiring the occupier to have public liability insurance. I have a new tenant lined up who is saying as he’s a private individual he shouldn’t have to have PL insurance,
my view is if a member of the public (guest of the tenant or not) walks in to his unit, trips over something and wants to sue, I’d rather the tenant had PL insurance. Insurance of his possessions is explicitly his responsibility in the agreement, normally on a household policy you get somePL cover with insurance of your possessions.
The tenant will have more or less exclusive use of the unit with locked door on the front, save for us having a key so we can access a fan controller on the wall at the back.
So thoughts please, should I insist on his having PL cover?
Currently I draw up my own licences based on one I had a solicitor do for me a few years ago, I have always had a clause in the licence requiring the occupier to have public liability insurance. I have a new tenant lined up who is saying as he’s a private individual he shouldn’t have to have PL insurance,
my view is if a member of the public (guest of the tenant or not) walks in to his unit, trips over something and wants to sue, I’d rather the tenant had PL insurance. Insurance of his possessions is explicitly his responsibility in the agreement, normally on a household policy you get somePL cover with insurance of your possessions.
The tenant will have more or less exclusive use of the unit with locked door on the front, save for us having a key so we can access a fan controller on the wall at the back.
So thoughts please, should I insist on his having PL cover?