• Welcome to The Farming Forum!

    As part of this update, we have made a change to the login and registration process. If you are experiences any problems, please email [email protected] with the details so we can resolve any issues.

Rothamsted Research gives gene editing the ‘thumbs-up’

agrilanduk.JPG


Written by Agriland Team

Rothamsted Research has submitted its responses to the UK government’s consultation questions on the regulation of gene editing (GE) technologies.

The submission argues that the current situation, whereby gene-edited organisms are regulated in the same way as transgenic GMOs, makes no scientific sense since the genetic changes in question could have been produced by traditional breeding methods.

Prof. Angela Karp, director of Rothamsted Research said:

“For plant breeding, there is no scientific justification for considering the introduction of targeted mutations in a crop by GE to be more risky than either mutations that occur naturally or random mutations induced using chemical or radiation mutagenesis.

“Moreover, the potential to improve to the safety and nutritional value of food crops through miniscule genomic changes introduced by GE, greatly outweighs any hypothetical risk of using the technology.”

Rothamsted Research testing


The submission cites the example of a new gene-edited wheat strain recently developed at Rothamsted, which has lowered levels of asparagine but is otherwise indistinguishable from unaltered plants.

When wheat products are cooked, asparagine can be converted to acrylamide, a potential carcinogen. The new strain will enhance food safety for consumers.

The document also includes details of how gene-editing can be used to improve the nutritional value of crops and promote disease resistance, potentially leading to reduced pesticide use.

Prof. Karp added that the team were not arguing that there should be no regulation of new genetic technologies.

She said: “It is entirely appropriate that formal regulations are drawn up to cover the development of new technologies.

“These should ensure consumer safety and encourage public confidence that all the necessary precautions are being taken.

“However, it is important that such regulations are grounded in science and that their management, after adoption, is also science-led and enabling,” she concluded.

The post Rothamsted Research gives gene editing the ‘thumbs-up’ appeared first on Agriland.co.uk.

Continue reading on the Agriland Website...
 

How is your SFI 24 application progressing?

  • havn't been invited to apply

    Votes: 29 37.2%
  • have been invited to apply

    Votes: 13 16.7%
  • applied but not yet accepted

    Votes: 28 35.9%
  • agreement up and running

    Votes: 8 10.3%

Webinar: Expanded Sustainable Farming Incentive offer 2024 -26th Sept

  • 2,394
  • 49
On Thursday 26th September, we’re holding a webinar for farmers to go through the guidance, actions and detail for the expanded Sustainable Farming Incentive (SFI) offer. This was planned for end of May, but had to be delayed due to the general election. We apologise about that.

Farming and Countryside Programme Director, Janet Hughes will be joined by policy leads working on SFI, and colleagues from the Rural Payment Agency and Catchment Sensitive Farming.

This webinar will be...
Back
Top