I think the point is that the industry as a whole cant afford from its enterprise output to make longterm reinvestment in essentialAre can't suggesting that @Cowabunga , and every other dairy farmer in the country that will be facing this problem currently, should invest in enough storage to allow for the unprecedented levels of rainfall that we’ve seen lately? Having 4 months of storage is plenty in a normal time, but do you suggest allowing for 200% of rainfall, just in case?
The op has, quite correctly, managed to exclude as much rainfall as possible from his store. He has a full store as the weather conditions have meant his ground hasn’t been suitable for emptying that store completely, before the winter housing period. Should he have applied it when it was so wet that it would have leached straight into watercourses? Or hold off to wait for better spreading conditions which would minimise pollution and soil damage? In a ‘normal’ year one would expect a suitable window at some stage, as everyone with a corn drill has been waiting for too, but this is certainly not a ‘normal’ year.
facilities and keep going , so they proritise accordingly and slurry would not give income or cost saving in the same way as say a new tmr diet feeder ,parlour , genetics or some land to grow maize etc .
Despite receiving subs grants etc from outside .
pollution regulations and issues and the need for investment surely must be one of the most common reasons for ceasing production - I would suggest the whole system some how or other has got its priorities mixed up , through no fault of its own .
Last edited: