its under the sward ..... waitingWhat rubbish does a grassland farmer have to burry
its under the sward ..... waitingWhat rubbish does a grassland farmer have to burry
I don't think it will be banned.remove glyphosate, and you completely alter the debate.
The art is you open it out so you can seed into it, just one operationits under the sward ..... waiting
Bicycle riders??What rubbish does a grassland farmer have to burry
They both have their place and the plough will remain just like it has for hundreds of years in one shape or form.Will no-till farming put paid to the plough?
The claimed benefits for minimising soil disturbance come with significant downsideswww.ft.com
we havnt had a good ploughing vrs DD dust up for awhile it all seems dominated by the politics of rt nfu et al
l hope it isn't, but there's plenty that do, and with court cases being lost, in the USA, l will be surprised, and pleased, if it isn't.I don't think it will be banned.
meant in an arable context..."pernicious weeds, like grasses"
Lol
A perfectly typical balanced mainstream media articleWill no-till farming put paid to the plough?
The claimed benefits for minimising soil disturbance come with significant downsideswww.ft.com
we havnt had a good ploughing vrs DD dust up for awhile it all seems dominated by the politics of rt nfu et al
One of the problems here was water travelling up the channels and rotting the seedThis year speaking to various people slugs have been a nightmare
where slugs have travelled up the channels made by some of these drills.
Is it environmentally friendly do use excessive slug pellets?
From my experience glyphosphate use is far higher than ploughing too.
Just the same round here tooa few around here who used a Clayton this year are going to have replant 90% in the spring (didn’t grow) , anyone who ploughed and one passed would have between 90 and 100% established. for the plough
If you've got easy working,free draining ,brashy soil then direct looks a no brainer .One of the problems here was water travelling up the channels and rotting the seed
0% falls into that category in n.ireland therefore the plough is our only option imoIf you've got easy working,free draining ,brashy soil then direct looks a no brainer .
The question is how much of the UK falls into this category.
One of the problems here was water travelling up the channels and rotting the seed
Just the same round here too
Just like to ask a question would a Groton drill help in these situations I think warksfarmers on heavy soil.Just the same round here
This year speaking to various people slugs have been a nightmare
where slugs have travelled up the channels made by some of these drills.
Is it environmentally friendly to use excessive slug pellets?
From my experience glyphosphate use is far higher than ploughing too.
I min till/ph drill instead of ploughing on a block of light/medium but it is far removedTo be fair, slugs have been a problem on a lot of ploughed ground this Autumn too. I’ve also seen vast acreages of cereals that are completely fooked, on farms that religiously plough & ph, because ‘they always have’.
As for glyphosate usage, plenty are using just as much in plough based systems. Whether they need to is a different matter, but plenty being used nonetheless.
My winter barley looks ok, considering. I haven’t had a plough on the farm in years, but it was cultivating prior to a neighbour drilling it with a combi-drill. I would have fared a lot worse if I had DD’ed as usual imo.
It did still need a dose of slug pellets though, so stands me quite a few quid extra in costs already…