Winds of change put onshore turbines back on the agenda for English farmers and landowners

logo-fb-new.png


Written by John Swire

Farmers and landowners in England who have previously been advised that wind turbines are not a viable diversification option are now being encouraged to reconsider their potential.

It is expected that a policy change could mean onshore wind will soon be able to again compete for government-backed contracts, with the energy source likely to be seen as playing an important role in the UK’s efforts to achieve carbon net zero status.

“At the moment onshore wind schemes will be refused planning permission if they receive local objection,” said Martin Williams, Associate at Carter Jonas. “Developers haven’t been prepared to take that risk, so since 2015, onshore wind has all but ceased in England.

“The government’s White Paper for Energy also doesn’t mention onshore wind – a significant oversight considering it is one of the easiest and cheapest forms of renewable energy to deploy. However, we understand the Prime Minister is starting to reconsider its potential as the government strives to achieve net zero by 2050.

“Scotland and Wales are both reaching saturation point as developers look for large areas to accommodate turbines to operate subsidy-free schemes. There are several areas in England where onshore wind developments would be a viable option too, and a policy change would open these areas up for development.”

This expected change of course from decision-makers in Westminster could prove the catalyst for wider adoption of onshore wind, with developers beginning to approach the owners of potential sites again.

“Existing policies dictate that a developer must site turbines in a location that has been identified as part of the local or neighbourhood plan as well as having community support, and a move away from this to a more open approach – as seen in Scotland and Wales – would allow for more deployment of turbines in England,” Martin said.

“Onshore wind won’t be suitable for every location; standard turbines are now more than 150m tall, with sites coming forward in Scotland and Wales at over 200m to the tip, so they will be best suited to sites in northern England where its openness and rural landscape is best suited to this sort of development and allow for schemes to be screened by the rolling landscape.

“With this proposed change in policy, it’s likely we are now going to see more developers approaching landowners to secure their land for a potential development.”

There are other practical considerations for farmers and estate owners to bear in mind. A good grid connection is always a necessity for any energy scheme. Access is key, but can now be overcome with the use of specialist equipment, and there are other various limitations on potential locations. Applications in Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty will struggle to secure planning consent and a buffer zone from nearby residential properties is necessary as well as a high average wind speed.

The popular Feed-in Tariff scheme closed to new applicants in 2019, therefore developers will focus on large developments that can generate a profit subsidy-free.

“The fact that developers are starting to approach landowners again backs up our belief that a policy change is on the horizon,” said Martin.

“If farmers and landowners have previously written off wind turbines as a diversification option, it would be worth reviewing their position and taking advice. We are aware of developers proactively contacting landowners with a view to earmarking sites and it is important that anyone who is approach knows where they stand.”







Get Our E-Newsletter - breaking news to your in-box twice a week
See e-newsletter example
Will be used in accordance with our Privacy Policy

Continue reading on the Farm Business Website...
 

PSQ

Member
Arable Farmer
Location
Scottish Borders
Just to mention that this doesn't apply in Scotland, as the SNP / ScotGov apparently have a policy of not allowing 'small' locally owned turbines 'because of the effect on tourism', yet actively give permission for the largest wind farms in Europe which happen to be owned by Fred Olsen (Norway) and the Iberdrola pension fund (Spain).

So if you have any ambition to generate you own power (and keep the money in the local economy), then unless you're a multinational overseas investor aiming to take the government sub out of the country you're sh!t out of luck.
 

Is Red tractor detrimental to your mental health?

  • Yes, Red tractor increase my stress and anxiety

    Votes: 293 97.7%
  • No, Red tractor gives me peace of mind that the product I produce is safe to enter the food chain

    Votes: 7 2.3%

HSENI names new farm safety champions

  • 134
  • 0
Written by William Kellett from Agriland

Farm-safety-640x360.png
The Health and Safety Executive for Northern Ireland (HSENI) alongside the Farm Safety Partnership (FSP), has named new farm safety champions and commended the outstanding work on farm safety that has been carried out in the farming community in the last 20 years.

Two of these champions are Malcom Downey, retired principal inspector for the Agri/Food team in HSENI and Harry Sinclair, current chair of the Farm Safety Partnership and former president of the Ulster Farmers’ Union (UFU).

Improving farm safety is the key aim of HSENI’s and the FSP’s work and...
Top