Worlds gone f***ing mad!

Dead Rabbits

Member
Location
'Merica
It ain’t passed but it looks grim. Y’all should check out the He waka eke noa recommendation report as well. Still looking through it.


I’m very disappointed in Dairy NZ. Compliance will get you nowhere. This type of regulation is based on a lie and there is a massive difference between a government setting and regulating “emissions” and doing it as an industry to meet “consumer demand”. I would have thought an organization that was supposed to represent farmers could have done a better job of representing farmers. Don’t play their stupid games.
I couldn’t say what would have been a better tactic but bending over and pulling your pants down for jacinda doesn’t looks like a good effort.
 
How can the likes of the UN influence government policies when the data currently is incorrect and conclusions flawed based on science???
And what accountabliy is there for governments who knowingly use false information to dictate mitigation intentionally for financial gain???🤔
 

S J H

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
Bedfordshire
I have recently started working part-time for a tree planting charity offering grants to farmers to plant trees on unproductive or awkward sites or to plant new hedgerows where appropriate. Many of the farmers who approach us have $$ signs in their eyes at the thought of cashing in the carbon credits from any tree planting they carry out. We always advise against it on the grounds that
a. once sold they are gone and the price is almost guaranteed to go up massively in coming years, so unless you need the money just register them and hang on tight, and
b. I tell them there is a fair chance that somewhere round the corner a carbon tax is coming onto agriculture and and carbon credits you can generate would count towards offsetting it.
It will be (b) they’ll take the opportunity from us to capitalise on it. I know it’s a bullshite scheme, but we should be in charge to sell these credits.
 

kiwi pom

Member
Location
canterbury NZ
Only the leftards.
I'm not so sure, look at all the companies buying farmers produce, they're all pushing the green agenda quite hard.
We talked about Tatua yesterday, have a look at their website, you'll see words like sustainability, environment and greenhouse gases.
Mrs KP works for a global processor, much of her work (had a 90 min call with the UK side last night) is around sustainability and carbon footprint.
Being "green" is a very big industry now.

The greens think we're not going anywhere near far enough and they seem to get more votes all the time.
I don't know where it will end.
 
In theory you should be able to breed animals which are lower methane producers. They want a reduction in animal ag in order to drop methane emissions ...... we all know that’s shite but you have to play the game. So they want less animals for less methane, so let’s try same number or more animals, less methane. And now let’s get their house in order ?
 
I'm not so sure, look at all the companies buying farmers produce, they're all pushing the green agenda quite hard.
We talked about Tatua yesterday, have a look at their website, you'll see words like sustainability, environment and greenhouse gases.
Mrs KP works for a global processor, much of her work (had a 90 min call with the UK side last night) is around sustainability and carbon footprint.
Being "green" is a very big industry now.

The greens think we're not going anywhere near far enough and they seem to get more votes all the time.
I don't know where it will end.
Is being green an actual trend or just a fashionable misconception or deception?
It's all very easy especially for politicians to talk about being "green", but how seriously can you take a politician who's previous job revolved around the discretionary use of non renewable fossil fuels???
Or a Green MP who uses air travel extensively yet does nothing to reduce its use or personally/physically to mitigate it??🤔
 
I'm not so sure, look at all the companies buying farmers produce, they're all pushing the green agenda quite hard.
We talked about Tatua yesterday, have a look at their website, you'll see words like sustainability, environment and greenhouse gases.
Mrs KP works for a global processor, much of her work (had a 90 min call with the UK side last night) is around sustainability and carbon footprint.
Being "green" is a very big industry now.

The greens think we're not going anywhere near far enough and they seem to get more votes all the time.
I don't know where it will end.
It's not going to end well, any government that dividing society and negatively destructing infrastructure with undemocratic control will eventually reap what it sows....
You can't control the world or a country with bulls**t for ever.
Dinners on me next time I come past, and no not the pie shop either.🤔😄
 
Last edited:

DaveGrohl

Member
Mixed Farmer
Location
Cumbria
:banghead: Methane is cyclical. Providing the number of cows and sheep numbers remains relatively unchanged they do not contribute to increased atmospheric methane, only replace what was produced by their ancestors!! Increased atmospheric methane is caused by new sources of methane, ie new gas boiler, gas power station, gas exploration, flights, increased population of farting humans (especially if vegan) and landfill. If tax is to slow the increase in atmospheric methane it has to hit these new sources but its so much easier to hit livestock producers. :mad:
Landfill is largely cyclical too but you’re otherwise bang on about new sources of methane. It’s the source that’s crucial, did it originate in atmospheric CO2 recently? No warming. Buried underground for 000s of millions of years? Entirely warming, irrespective of it being methane or whatever.
 

DaveGrohl

Member
Mixed Farmer
Location
Cumbria
No VAT on food to help its affordability, but a carbon tax instead.

What do they propose doing with all the grass if ruminants don't eat it? Let it rot? Feed it to horses? Burn it? Feed it to an AD plant if the forager can negotiate hills?

And what they going to do with the rapeseed meal, or soyabean meal, or sunflower expeller, or palm kernel, or brewers grains, or maize gluten, or sugar beet pulp, or citrus pulp, or bread waste, or etc. Let it rot? Put it in the AD plant? Spread it on the land? Burn it?

Someone send them back to school to learn the carbon cycle.
Politicians (and seemingly farming representatives) don’t think about such things. It’s too complicated for them clearly.
 

SFI - What % were you taking out of production?

  • 0 %

    Votes: 105 40.5%
  • Up to 25%

    Votes: 94 36.3%
  • 25-50%

    Votes: 39 15.1%
  • 50-75%

    Votes: 5 1.9%
  • 75-100%

    Votes: 3 1.2%
  • 100% I’ve had enough of farming!

    Votes: 13 5.0%

May Event: The most profitable farm diversification strategy 2024 - Mobile Data Centres

  • 1,739
  • 32
With just a internet connection and a plug socket you too can join over 70 farms currently earning up to £1.27 ppkw ~ 201% ROI

Register Here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/the-mo...2024-mobile-data-centres-tickets-871045770347

Tuesday, May 21 · 10am - 2pm GMT+1

Location: Village Hotel Bury, Rochdale Road, Bury, BL9 7BQ

The Farming Forum has teamed up with the award winning hardware manufacturer Easy Compute to bring you an educational talk about how AI and blockchain technology is helping farmers to diversify their land.

Over the past 7 years, Easy Compute have been working with farmers, agricultural businesses, and renewable energy farms all across the UK to help turn leftover space into mini data centres. With...
Top