choochter
Member
- Location
- aberdeenshire
Goodness, is that all?http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/apr/27/shepherd-snowdon-conservation-national-trust
At £11/hr according to that article.
Goodness, is that all?http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/apr/27/shepherd-snowdon-conservation-national-trust
At £11/hr according to that article.
Yup. But they are always looking to buy more historic properties. They own at least 4 choice farms on the Pembrokeshire coast that I know of. Better off if they concentrated on properties, or land, but not both. Spreading themselves a bit too thinly.You don't get rich by giving it away.
I suspect the tenant may be eligible for bps on 145 acres but the NT will be claiming hls and the would be tenant will sign a liability declaration to indemnify the NT against any agreement repayment claim in the event of breaching any part of css agreements.Why does every one assume the NT keep the subs I can't see how they can if your a tenant and as such the farmer. I bet it's a good deal with a whole heap of hassle it will get a massive response
no it isn't, they'll own nothing and will not be able to build up anything of their own, they'll just be treading water at bestTo me on paper it sounds like a great opportunity for someone wanting to take the next step into sheep farming who has little capital.
The rubbish on here is this pish ^^^ get real ffs.There's an awful lot of negative rubbish being talked on this thread. None of us know what restrictions there are or what will happen to the subsidy money.
What is clear to me is that is has already been a very cheap and effective PR exercise for the NT, getting coverage in most national newspapers and widely discussed on social media. They could have just let it on a FBT for what £50 per acre and got no coverage or criticism. It sounds like they are hoping to make a Tv series or similar about the farm and the successful tenant which will again be massive publicity. They aren't going to want to set someone up to fail.
To me on paper it sounds like a great opportunity for someone wanting to take the next step into sheep farming who has little capital.
It won't be a picnic but then starting farming from scratch is never easy no matter how you go about it.
In summary cheer up you miserable barstewards.
how is this different to most new entry tenant farmers, except they have to make enough money to pay rent.no it isn't, they'll own nothing and will not be able to build up anything of their own, they'll just be treading water at best
how is this different to most new entry tenant farmers, except they have to make enough money to pay rent.
Merely speculation, but how would you expand your farming operation if you were tied to stock limits or a no cattle rule? The buildings there are ideal for a B and B cattle enterprise, would they let the tenant take cattle in to utilise the buildings over the winter for example? Possibly there's a lot to be had in exchange for shepherding the flock that's to be used to manage the place? But, the token rent suggests otherwise in my opinion.how is this different to most new entry tenant farmers, except they have to make enough money to pay rent.
Merely speculation, but how would you expand your farming operation if you were tied to stock limits or a no cattle rule? The buildings there are ideal for a B and B cattle enterprise, would they let the tenant take cattle in to utilise the buildings over the winter for example? Possibly there's a lot to be had in exchange for shepherding the flock that's to be used to manage the place? But, the token rent suggests otherwise in my opinion.
Why does every one assume the NT keep the subs I can't see how they can if your a tenant and as such the farmer. I bet it's a good deal with a whole heap of hassle it will get a massive response
Ok I see that does put a different spin on it ,what would you put the lamb crop in at plus a free house?I understand why it might not be so attractive to take on now it's going to need some sort of extra income.It will depend if it's let on a FBT or "management agreement"
FBT= tenant gets bps
Management agreement = nt keeps bps and environmental money, but its likely some of the environmental money will be paid to the farmer if management conditions are met.
The NT like management agreements.
Nothing wrong with a management agreement, but its a step below a FBT but a step above grass keep
Note. This is first hand experience.
I think the walking thing is more to do with access for a quad, outside of the farm ring fence it's a lot of very steep ground leading down to sheer cliffs, only walking territory to be honest, you'd get your quad to a point, then have to walk from there. You'd need to be a mountaineer or such like, as you could get in to deep sh!t if you weren't used to the place.If its anything like the snowden job there won't be time for anything else.
Reading between the lines, they want the sheep to target certain areas with grazing. But obviously electric fencing would spoil the look, so they have to be dogged to move there and stay there.
Also, the talk of the applicant needing to love walking suggests to me that they won't allow a quad...
I know a lot of negative farmers. I don't know any negative farmers who have progressed. Some see the opportunity, others only see problems.The rubbish on here is this pish ^^^ get real ffs.