caveman
Member
- Location
- East Sussex.
Same could be said for U bend slime.If it walks like a U turn, and talks like a U turn, then it probably is a U turn!
Where's the U turn?
Same could be said for U bend slime.If it walks like a U turn, and talks like a U turn, then it probably is a U turn!
Same could be said for U bend slime.
Where's the U turn?
Yes so slight an interest it cost lives of many soldiers defending the rights of the citizens who wanted to remain in the UK .The union ceased to be of the slightest interest or relevance to English Etonian nationalists, quite some time ago!
NI in particular, is utterly expendable. A financial and political black hole. Once in an electoral blue moon, it’s quite convenient for the Tories to use the NI unionists as a prop. The prop however is ruthlessly dispensed with as soon as the house arithmetic changes.
You totally miss the ironic point. It doesn't surprise me one little bit.Yes so slight an interest it cost lives of many soldiers defending the rights of the citizens who wanted to remain in the UK .
You know the democratic majority, if that changes then the rest of us will be sad if they leave the UK, but one thing I guarantee is that we wont act like spoilt brats like the EU have we will part on good terms.
So? The powers that be are going ahead with preparations to accommodate a deal.
What would you call this situation then?
Brexit: Amal Clooney quits government envoy role over law break plan
The human rights lawyer says she is "dismayed" by the UK being prepared to break international law.www.bbc.co.uk
I suggest you get out of that cave and smell the coffee.
So? The powers that be are going ahead with preparations to accommodate a deal.
Isn't getting a deal the end game?
As for that bint. Who gives a flying f**k?
She'll be just another parasite.Oh dear me! I wonder what sort of qualifications and experience you have compared to Mrs Clooney? I'm fairly sure of the answer.
She also has principles.
You raised the matter, see below, and I can't see how it could 'correlate', the very real EDU (and its proposed and likely successor) not being affected by or dependent upon 19th Century naval power.Not at all, you have still got to show me how you manage to correlate 19th century navel power with the concept of a hypothetical European army.
One of the problems is Leavers back in the day didn't like the EEC either, due to it's the lack of rules governing things like state aid, unfair working practices, mutual recognition of standards etc. which they though was disadvantaging UK industry. So Thatcher drove forward the concept of a European single market to change this and unsurprisingly the ruddy Leavers didn't like that either because this was now infringing on their mystical UK sovereignty. Basically they would just like to go back to the 19th century international rule book, which stated whoever had the biggest navy set all the trading rules.
She's fairly well respected in her field, but no genius and she does play identity politics.Oh dear me! I wonder what sort of qualifications and experience you have compared to Mrs Clooney? I'm fairly sure of the answer.
She also has principles.
Have you examples of this with references? I'm sure you must have several.She's fairly well respected in her field, but no genius and she does play identity politics.
But, she's a damned hypocrite in this matter, the EU have been 'breaking international law'* for years, she must know this, and yet hasn't complained once. Remoaner hissy fit, no more.
*Which doesn't actually exist.
good idea, what about the border though ? a big wall ?maybe Wales can break free and join the eu
Can you just imagine the incandescent rage from @danllclan
good idea, what about the border though ? a big wall ?
You raised the matter, see below, and I can't see how it could 'correlate', the very real EDU (and its proposed and likely successor) not being affected by or dependent upon 19th Century naval power.
But there is an obvious nexus between your assertion - dig - claiming that Brexit supporters want gunboat diplomacy, and your beloved EU doing its best to establish itself as a military power, presumably (and remarkably stupidly) in an effort to bypass NATO.
We know that the EU doesn't want military power for humanitarian purposes, Cosovo etc. demonstrate that; and, following the Crimean fun and games, we know that lovely Germany would rather chew broken glass than annoy Russia, much, because it would freeze if it did - so the EU won't do anything like that. Why is the EU seeking to make itself 'powerful' if not for defence or peacekeeping? The options are fairly limited, and they include what you referred to, gunboat diplomacy; perhaps the EU have watched China and want to give it a go...
Now, you have to show me that your claim, below, is factual, rather than just mere pejorative writing...
Have you examples of this with references? I'm sure you must have several.
Of course, but you can do a search for it yourself easily enough. For a start, just take a squint at the WTO treaty it signed and has ignored, and the rulings following treaty breaches, which it's ignored, including those regarding GM foods and Airbus among others.Have you examples of this with references? I'm sure you must have several.
Because nobody asked for them. I didn't defend Boris for breaking it, although I applaud his action, I stated that it didn't exist so a defence wasn't necessary.He has made that claim of EU breaking international law, over and over, without a scintilla of supporting data. Interesting also, that in another post defending Boris for breaking international law, he uses as part of the defence that there is “no such thing as international law”! Then he regularly calls others hypocrites...
Full of hyperbole but contains no substance. Typical propagandist article.Top legal opinion: It’s the EU which has broken international law, not the UK
For months the EU has been in material breach of its obligations under the Withdrawal Treatyfacts4eu.org
Of course, but you can do a search for it yourself easily enough. For a start, just take a squint at the WTO treaty it signed and has ignored, and the rulings following treaty breaches, which it's ignored, including those regarding GM foods and Airbus among others.
Is she the one who advised the Greek government to sue HMG over the Elgin Marbles?She's fairly well respected in her field, but no genius and she does play identity politics.
But, she's a damned hypocrite in this matter, the EU have been 'breaking international law'* for years, she must know this, and yet hasn't complained once. Remoaner hissy fit, no more.
*Which doesn't actually exist.
Alright, look at its breach with Airbus for a start:No. I specifically asked YOU to justify your claims.