MF weak drop arms

Cowabunga

Member
Location
Ceredigion,Wales

Now then. I mentioned in a post above somewhere that there was an alternative anchor point for the stabilisers that centred the raised links and which could cause damage if the stabilisers were tightened too much. It works by moving the pivot point of the stabilisers from the same plane as that of the lower link anchor pins, to an offset position. Open the picture above and note the higher up hole for the front of the stabiliser, which is the one I mean.

Anyone use this alternative pair of holes? Did anyone know what it was for? Don't be shy now, hands up if you knew and both hands up if you actually use it fairly regularly on a power harrow, drill or plough where is can be very useful indeed.

More importantly perhaps, has anyone cause any damage to the tractor by using these anchor holes and maladjusting the stabilisers to stop sway when the links are down, only to lift the links and bend something to buggery as a result?
 

Lofty1984

Member
Mixed Farmer
Location
South wales
I have put springs from the link arms to the stabilizer brackets to stop the arms flopping about and tangling with the hitch or PTO,
Done it first on the 6270 for the baler but it worked so well I have put some on the 4355, 3060 and 3075, don't know why they don't do something like that from new bloody arms flopping from side to side drives you nuts, it also helps when hitching up
There’s an internal spring on new ones but it’s made of toffee
 

Lofty1984

Member
Mixed Farmer
Location
South wales
Now then. I mentioned in a post above somewhere that there was an alternative anchor point for the stabilisers that centred the raised links and which could cause damage if the stabilisers were tightened too much. It works by moving the pivot point of the stabilisers from the same plane as that of the lower link anchor pins, to an offset position. Open the picture above and note the higher up hole for the front of the stabiliser, which is the one I mean.

Anyone use this alternative pair of holes? Did anyone know what it was for? Don't be shy now, hands up if you knew and both hands up if you actually use it fairly regularly on a power harrow, drill or plough where is can be very useful indeed.

More importantly perhaps, has anyone cause any damage to the tractor by using these anchor holes and maladjusting the stabilisers to stop sway when the links are down, only to lift the links and bend something to buggery as a result?
I didn’t know that👋
 

mf7480

Member
Mixed Farmer
Now then. I mentioned in a post above somewhere that there was an alternative anchor point for the stabilisers that centred the raised links and which could cause damage if the stabilisers were tightened too much. It works by moving the pivot point of the stabilisers from the same plane as that of the lower link anchor pins, to an offset position. Open the picture above and note the higher up hole for the front of the stabiliser, which is the one I mean.

Anyone use this alternative pair of holes? Did anyone know what it was for? Don't be shy now, hands up if you knew and both hands up if you actually use it fairly regularly on a power harrow, drill or plough where is can be very useful indeed.

More importantly perhaps, has anyone cause any damage to the tractor by using these anchor holes and maladjusting the stabilisers to stop sway when the links are down, only to lift the links and bend something to buggery as a result?

It actually makes for the best automatic stabiliser available. But as you explained it’s absolutely not fool proof and I gave up using those settings after dad accidentally destroyed a stabiliser, it’s very easily done.
 

Sharpy

Member
Livestock Farmer
Now then. I mentioned in a post above somewhere that there was an alternative anchor point for the stabilisers that centred the raised links and which could cause damage if the stabilisers were tightened too much. It works by moving the pivot point of the stabilisers from the same plane as that of the lower link anchor pins, to an offset position. Open the picture above and note the higher up hole for the front of the stabiliser, which is the one I mean.

Anyone use this alternative pair of holes? Did anyone know what it was for? Don't be shy now, hands up if you knew and both hands up if you actually use it fairly regularly on a power harrow, drill or plough where is can be very useful indeed.

More importantly perhaps, has anyone cause any damage to the tractor by using these anchor holes and maladjusting the stabilisers to stop sway when the links are down, only to lift the links and bend something to buggery as a result?
The same idea as International had from the B250 through the worldwide series to the CX range. Its amazing how many people don't know about it..
 

Henarar

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
Somerset
Now then. I mentioned in a post above somewhere that there was an alternative anchor point for the stabilisers that centred the raised links and which could cause damage if the stabilisers were tightened too much. It works by moving the pivot point of the stabilisers from the same plane as that of the lower link anchor pins, to an offset position. Open the picture above and note the higher up hole for the front of the stabiliser, which is the one I mean.

Anyone use this alternative pair of holes? Did anyone know what it was for? Don't be shy now, hands up if you knew and both hands up if you actually use it fairly regularly on a power harrow, drill or plough where is can be very useful indeed.

More importantly perhaps, has anyone cause any damage to the tractor by using these anchor holes and maladjusting the stabilisers to stop sway when the links are down, only to lift the links and bend something to buggery as a result?
They are for Ploughing or anything where you want the stabilizers tight when the linkage is up and lose when its down and I haven't used them as I hardly do any
 

Henarar

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
Somerset
Now then. I mentioned in a post above somewhere that there was an alternative anchor point for the stabilisers that centred the raised links and which could cause damage if the stabilisers were tightened too much. It works by moving the pivot point of the stabilisers from the same plane as that of the lower link anchor pins, to an offset position. Open the picture above and note the higher up hole for the front of the stabiliser, which is the one I mean.

Anyone use this alternative pair of holes? Did anyone know what it was for? Don't be shy now, hands up if you knew and both hands up if you actually use it fairly regularly on a power harrow, drill or plough where is can be very useful indeed.

More importantly perhaps, has anyone cause any damage to the tractor by using these anchor holes and maladjusting the stabilisers to stop sway when the links are down, only to lift the links and bend something to buggery as a result?
From memory as I don't have one any more but didn't the old MF's (500's and so on) with the heavy duty axle have two holes for the link arms where they go under the axle to do the same thing but the light duty axle didn't have this ?
 

Cowabunga

Member
Location
Ceredigion,Wales
From memory as I don't have one any more but didn't the old MF's (500's and so on) with the heavy duty axle have two holes for the link arms where they go under the axle to do the same thing but the light duty axle didn't have this ?
They had two holes for the anchor point of the lower links. Basically the lugs were extended so that the links could be fitted to the lower holes for tractors like the 595 which had the larger diameter wheels, such as 16.9r38. They needed this for the links to run level in draft work so the links didn't slope down towards the back, preventing the maintenance of implement depth. This axle was fitted mostly to French built tractors which included some 590 and all 590 4wd models.

Centralising the links as they raised was standard on all models up to the 200 and 600 series I think. This was done using the internal check chains which tightened as the links were raised. They were attached on models other than the 595 to lugs on the PTO cover plate, using triangular plates with different length sides. This was so that they could be adjusted for cat1 or cat2 links. In what was then counted as being heavy work, the check chains stretched in work, which was unfortunate. The anchor lugs were not strong enough either, and could tear off. The 595 has a sort of staple affair anchoring the check chains to the drawbar frame, but again these were too weak and would bend and strip the attaching nut off from below the drawbar plate is a big [for the time] plough or disc was used on steep ground.
 
Last edited:

Henarar

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
Somerset
They had two holes for the anchor point of the lower links. Basically the lugs were extended so that the links could be fitted to the lower holes for tractors like the 595 which had the larger diameter wheels, such as 16.9r38. They needed this for the links to run level in draft work so the links didn't slope down towards the back, preventing the maintenance of implement depth. This axle was fitted mostly to French built tractors which included some 590 and all 590 4wd models.

Centralising the links as they raised was standard on all models up to the 200 and 600 series I think. This was done using the internal check chains which tightened as the links were raised. They were attached on models other than the 595 to lugs on the PTO cover plate, using triangular plates with different length sides. This was so that they could be adjusted for cat1 or cat2 links. In what was then counted as being heavy work, the check chains stretched in work, which was unfortunate. The anchor lugs were not strong enough either, and could tear off. The 595 has a sort of staple affair anchoring the check chains to the drawbar frame, but again these were too weak and would bend and strip the attaching nut off from below the drawbar plate is a big [for the time] plough or disc was used on steep ground.
I actually answered my own question remembering that the 4355 has the old HD axle and had a look :giggle:
 

James

Member
Location
Comber, Down
Now then. I mentioned in a post above somewhere that there was an alternative anchor point for the stabilisers that centred the raised links and which could cause damage if the stabilisers were tightened too much. It works by moving the pivot point of the stabilisers from the same plane as that of the lower link anchor pins, to an offset position. Open the picture above and note the higher up hole for the front of the stabiliser, which is the one I mean.

Anyone use this alternative pair of holes? Did anyone know what it was for? Don't be shy now, hands up if you knew and both hands up if you actually use it fairly regularly on a power harrow, drill or plough where is can be very useful indeed.

More importantly perhaps, has anyone cause any damage to the tractor by using these anchor holes and maladjusting the stabilisers to stop sway when the links are down, only to lift the links and bend something to buggery as a result?

Yep I knew that :D
Used to use it too but recent tractors don't have them. Worked a treat
 

Fendtbro

Member
Oh right. I probably did it myself then somehow, I lift the arms up and put the pin under the arm to keep them up and away from the pto shaft on bedder and baler etc. Yes a quick easy fix. Got a fright though
Common problem that.. when you drop the arms with weight on and the pin under the lower link. We have done the same with the fastrac.
 

Farmer_Joe

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
The North
rear links.jpg


thats at york not sure if vt's (Its a 74)have the type of link connnector bit bbut this guy appears to have put different ones in, look like the type used on the top link that fits to tractor end.

these
top link.jpg
 

Cowabunga

Member
Location
Ceredigion,Wales
View attachment 912255

thats at york not sure if vt's (Its a 74)have the type of link connnector bit bbut this guy appears to have put different ones in, look like the type used on the top link that fits to tractor end.



these
View attachment 912257
That it a DynaVT with MF's standard linkage and a Dromone push back autohitch for trailers. The linkage parts are standard items made by CBM [they have the badge with two bars and three dots.

This tractor has the drop arm pins under the links, which is bad practice, and which bends the lift rods on some models is links are moved inappropriately. The standard external screw stabilisers seen on this tractor can be replaced by the Walterscheid automatic ones which lock sideways movement automatically if desired, which you often find on John Deere tractors.

The plastic end caps on the square profile lift rods for the auto hitch are missing on this tractor. It is important to keep dirt out of those tubes and plenty of oil inside, to lubricate the inner sliding part, otherwise bent autohitch lift rods will result. They do not like being dry either and will catch steel on steel and bend. Which reminds me to oil my rod as soon as possible. :woot:
 

Cowabunga

Member
Location
Ceredigion,Wales
Check out ?Link arms this is on mf 7726s View attachment 912260View attachment 912260
Can you zoom out a bit to provide some context?

At first glance there has been some serious thrusting going on to cause a fracture like that. Not sure whether it is a front or rear link from that picture. Looks like the tractor has been turned with an equally large implement still soil engaging rather than with lifted links, forcing the link against the limiter plate seen, rather worn at bottom right, rather than properly adjusted external stabilisers which should stop sway before links engage with that plate, but context is all. The plate is there not as a stop for working linkage but to provide a stop for unattached links to prevent them slapping towards the centre and hitting the drawbar frame or autohitch lift rod. In work it should always be the external stabilisers that stop implement sway, not that free-link limiter near the tractor end of the link.

Unless there is some overwhelming other evidence otherwise, I would class that as driver abuse [improper use] rather than a substandard component.
 
Last edited:

SFI - What % were you taking out of production?

  • 0 %

    Votes: 110 38.5%
  • Up to 25%

    Votes: 108 37.8%
  • 25-50%

    Votes: 41 14.3%
  • 50-75%

    Votes: 6 2.1%
  • 75-100%

    Votes: 4 1.4%
  • 100% I’ve had enough of farming!

    Votes: 17 5.9%

May Event: The most profitable farm diversification strategy 2024 - Mobile Data Centres

  • 3,014
  • 49
With just a internet connection and a plug socket you too can join over 70 farms currently earning up to £1.27 ppkw ~ 201% ROI

Register Here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/the-mo...2024-mobile-data-centres-tickets-871045770347

Tuesday, May 21 · 10am - 2pm GMT+1

Location: Village Hotel Bury, Rochdale Road, Bury, BL9 7BQ

The Farming Forum has teamed up with the award winning hardware manufacturer Easy Compute to bring you an educational talk about how AI and blockchain technology is helping farmers to diversify their land.

Over the past 7 years, Easy Compute have been working with farmers, agricultural businesses, and renewable energy farms all across the UK to help turn leftover space into mini data centres. With...
Top