What are RT trying to do? Is it just because calves are on the dairy farm for a few weeks? Rediculous if that's the case.I'm dropping it and will see how I go. Will keep farming until I'm too much of a criminal to be allowed to carry on.
Why won't RT and the NFU give a detailed reply to this. What's the NFU thinking about ...it's scandalous of our farming union not answering point by point. The longer they leave it then the more they make fools of themselves.Thanks.
Well done Abi. Think she can see the issues, discontent, and how RT (particularly Jim) are looking like their principles are built on sand.
I think RT are wobbling. Wonder if they'll eventually fall off their perch?
Not great coming from the CEO that imports (sort of assured by pesticide declaration/testing) are arguably better standard than RT assurance. That just diminishes the RT brand doesn't it?
It also means Jim basically agrees with us, that UK farmers can simply make a pesticide declaration and that grain is perfectly good.
Wonder what AIC think now? Jim seemingly agrees that imports and pesticide declarations are a very good way of assuring the food/feed safety of grain. If that's coming from the CEO of England's dominant farm assurance company, then AIC should surely agree to accept pesticide declarations from UK farmers, just as they do for imported grain.
I don't know wheather to laugh or cry. This thing just gets more and more unbelievable!
I think NFU just aren't prepared to publicly say too much against RT.Why won't RT and the NFU give a detailed reply to this. What's the NFU thinking about ...it's scandalous of our farming union not answering point by point. The longer they leave it then the more they make fools of themselves.
No I think you and several others have nailed it on many occasions.I think NFU just aren't prepared to publicly say too much against RT.
AHDB were disappointed with NFU. They said NFU didn't show any real support to help them when AHDB were trying to get RT/AIC to create a level playingfield for grain market access.
To me, that means NFU have positioned themselves to deliberately support putting the English farmers at a competitive disadvantage to foreign farmers, and are backing the situation where market access is compromised for English farmers to sell grain to UK mills.
I really don't know what the NFU are thinking. They seem to be representing RT, processors and retailers, at a cost to farmers.
Is it just me? Have I interpreted it incorrectly? Or is it all just very bizarre?
What are RT trying to do?
That attitude is what has got us into this situation. Of course it's less trouble to pay the premium/ inspection fee and most of us are fairly compliant with spray records etc.Acccording to my grain merchant, most of our exports to Europe require RT. Some African countries don’t require RT. I don’t like it, but I sometimes think it takes less effort to just get on and do it, than keep moaning about it.
Pragmatic way forward.
I have left the scheme so that's 2 of us. Someone will buy our grain I have no doubt. Then there'll be a few more next year.Yes, you can, you've just got to have the balls to get on with it. I have gone unassured this year, you've got to vote with your feet. Yes I will take a hit financially but am happy to, if we all did it, RT would be finished.
How does a red tractor inspector asking "can you give me an example of one spray application please?", have any effect on fusarium on that farm?But do we really understand the regulations of the land in all their varieties without having a set of standards drawn together for us? RT is a checklist as much as anything under one umbrella. It’s about management of risk. It’s not pefect but I think it’s slightly better than nothing. What bugs me about it most is the charges that it incurs as a knock on effect such as sprayer MOTs etc. Such tests could often be performesmd and signed off by a NROSO registered operator himself but they always seem to end up as a money spinner for somebody else on ten times my hourly rate.
If we “owned” RT rather than “disowned” RT then maybe we could make it work harder for us and less costly.
We won’t get away from needing some form of assurance. It’s customer driven. We just need to keep it lean and proportionate.
It’s a bit of an aside but I think mycotoxins will become a big issue with wetter warmer summers, in fact I’d already say they are here. We can produce to moisture, bushel weight etc but I think we will struggle with things like fusarium in the coming years and I can’t see an obvious solution. (other than GS4!)
I'm dropping it and will see how I go. Will keep farming until I'm too much of a criminal to be allowed to carry on.
In that case one could do same and separate the beet from the cereals. Surely fewer petty rules for beet. This would overcome the doubts of those saying they can't leave because of their beet being in the way. Or better still one could have some sort of agreement with a neighbour that, on paper, he grows the beet for you and it all goes under his contract with his RT...maybe this almost creates as much paperwork as rt!Move your beef cattle on to a separate business. Or at least tell them that's what you have done. Minor paper trail showing the cattle have passed into the ownership of your wife/son/daugter/cousin/dog, which pays rent and housekeeping to the main farm, then carry on as yoiu are. Nothing they can do about it as they don't (yet!!!) have the right to scrutinise your accounts or business structure.
We did a similar manoeuvre to keep our non RT potatoes and associated chems/sprays away from their prying eyes. Not because we are hiding illegal activity, but just to cut out huge amount of paperwork.
Actually produced in the UK is already a higher standard. Everyone knows that.I agree with you we need some sort of assurance...EQUAL TO IMORTS. Why would anyone want over and above that? If imports are acceptable and indeed meet over and above the quality of RT grain, as Jim says, then surely we can up our quality by testing to import standards and not fuss around with all the petty rules just to produce jobs for the boys. Imports have not fussed around with audits etc. The trade and RT apparently agree we don't need anything over and above this.
I still just don't get it. I cant put up with illogical discussion.
I have dropped the lot; cereals and beef and lamb. I'm wondering why I put up with the expense and humiliation for so longI have dropped beef and sheep FA. They'll have to manage without my cash from now on!! Would love to drop the dairy FA too, but no chance of that at the moment. Evil Jim M has got us with that - how did we ever get into this mess?!
You make a very good point there. "Imports are better than UK farm assured because of tests" says CEO of red tractor.Edit. Meant to quote @Drillman who posted article from Abi in Arable Farming magazine.
Thanks.
Well done Abi. Think she can see the issues, discontent, and how RT (particularly Jim) are looking like their principles are built on sand.
I think RT are wobbling. Wonder if they'll eventually fall off their perch?
Not great coming from the CEO that imports (sort of assured by pesticide declaration/testing) are arguably better standard than RT assurance. That just diminishes the RT brand doesn't it?
It also means Jim basically agrees with us, that UK farmers can simply make a pesticide declaration and that grain is perfectly good.
Wonder what AIC think now? Jim seemingly agrees that imports and pesticide declarations are a very good way of assuring the food/feed safety of grain. If that's coming from the CEO of England's dominant farm assurance company, then AIC should surely agree to accept pesticide declarations from UK farmers, just as they do for imported grain.
I don't know wheather to laugh or cry. This thing just gets more and more unbelievable!
The Nfu gave the scheme 10/10. That's how we got into this mess.I have dropped beef and sheep FA. They'll have to manage without my cash from now on!! Would love to drop the dairy FA too, but no chance of that at the moment. Evil Jim M has got us with that - how did we ever get into this mess?!
The non farmers union are now controlled by its corporate members and no longer run for the benefit of farmers.Why won't RT and the NFU give a detailed reply to this. What's the NFU thinking about ...it's scandalous of our farming union not answering point by point. The longer they leave it then the more they make fools of themselves.