Get sub in December and give 40 % back in January ! I will be able to manage without it and will be pushing productivity harder to make up for the shortfall.All this talk of no one taking up sfi how many can actually say they banked 100% of there bps and will be able to manage on zero sub going forward
BPS was the bottom line, SFI (payment for income forgone) will add little if anything to the bottom line. As @DrWazzock says, the irony of SFI is that it will push many into more intensive production.All this talk of no one taking up sfi how many can actually say they banked 100% of there bps and will be able to manage on zero sub going forward
I would not say intensive production, more a case of less spending which might hurt supply trade more, anyway soon find out now.BPS was the bottom line, SFI (payment for income forgone) will add little if anything to the bottom line. As @DrWazzock says, the irony of SFI is that it will push many into more intensive production.
BPS was the bottom line, SFI (payment for income forgone) will add little if anything to the bottom line. As @DrWazzock says, the irony of SFI is that it will push many into more intensive production.
It wouldn’t be a bad thing if it was balanced across all sectors, but when it’s so skewed in favour of arable and against livestock it won’t work.is that a bad thing ? produce food more intensifying where soils / climate suits and off set with subs to improve environment on land where soils / climates make that economic food production more marginal or even impossible ?
…… i suspect this is very intentional
It wouldn’t be a bad thing if it was balanced across all sectors, but when it’s so skewed in favour of arable and against livestock it won’t work.
Who will buy all that feed grain in 10 years time?
I think my point is that those most in need of support are those least likely to get it. If the support isn’t there, alternative sources of income need finding and many will try intensifying production first.lot of arable will go out of production (33% here will and im sure i won’t be alone in that !) and we already export feed wheat so uk has been long sort of enough livestock to eat it
i’m not saying this is good. …….. but it is reality
The only thing i would say is that marginal poorer soils/climate are not worth as much or command such a high rent therefore the investment is pro rata, owing to lower output.is that a bad thing ? produce food more intensifying where soils / climate suits and off set with subs to improve environment on land where soils / climates make that economic food production more marginal or even impossible ?
…… i suspect this is very intentional
My heart says it won't be there in 10 years time but I may be wrong. My impression of it is Defra/RPA are currently spending all of the money on civil servants/consultants altering things all of the time that after a few years the aims will not be really achieved and be quietly binned or altered.It wouldn’t be a bad thing if it was balanced across all sectors, but when it’s so skewed in favour of arable and against livestock it won’t work.
Who will buy all that feed grain in 10 years time?
Arable farmers will have their own stock or a joint venture.It wouldn’t be a bad thing if it was balanced across all sectors, but when it’s so skewed in favour of arable and against livestock it won’t work.
Who will buy all that feed grain in 10 years time?
Quite possibly, but only if they’re financially viable.Arable farmers will have their own stock or a joint venture.
So more stock then? not less?I think my point is that those most in need of support are those least likely to get it. If the support isn’t there, alternative sources of income need finding and many will try intensifying production first.
We don’t appear to be going to get anything for the offset you speak ofis that a bad thing ? produce food more intensifying where soils / climate suits and off set with subs to improve environment on land where soils / climates make that economic food production more marginal or even impossible ?
…… i suspect this is very intentional
Quite unlikely for many unless some of us hill farmers become staff for such likeQuite possibly, but only if they’re financially viable.
Not looked closely yet, but had a free visit from an ADAS advisor yesterday who knew less than me, what a waist of time and money. Is the an option that would be a good break and control grass weeds.unless output / input prices change significantly i wouldn’t be surprised if uk osr and bean acreage was less than 100k acres within the next few years - i just can see no reason to grow these crops anymore when there are sfi options that offer greater gross margin risk free ?
Joint ventures, already happening locally. Hill farmers buying lowland farms.Quite unlikely for many unless some of us hill farmers become staff for such like