Both ways too ,French will love thatThat'll be in the back of the 7000 lorries queuing in Kent
Both ways too ,French will love thatThat'll be in the back of the 7000 lorries queuing in Kent
France has already built the lorry parks, customs facilities and even the restaurants. Douane have increased in number, many more being trained.Both ways too ,French will love that
Actually, the UK needs to ensure its Nuclear Arms are state of the art to avoid being bitch sapped by anyone.
To the ones who feel our nuclear subs et al should be disbanded - need to check themselves... And sign into a looney bin....
We Must, keep our Nuclear Deterant to the highest order - No Argument...
UK having a nuclear deterrent ensures we are America's bitch and they will always control who we could deploy it against. The UK should have a modern well equipped armed forces that is not constantly being cut to pieces by the government.
That, of course has not been proved at all, any more than US military contracts are used to subsidise Boeing.
Do try again with something of more substance and relevance. I did think that you were employed in some kind of legal profession. Perhaps I am mistaken in this. Almost certainly in fact, since you cannot see the gravity of what the PM is doing with his proposed breaking of a recently signed legal agreement, a consequence of which is that he breaks the Good Friday Agreement as well, which has even wider repercussions.
France has already built the lorry parks, customs facilities and even the restaurants. Douane have increased in number, many more being trained.
Do you still think the EU will back down?
I find the nuke talk hilarious...
In case you havent noticed...what you need is a good virus in your back pocket for a rainy day...
Nukes are old news.... highly ineffective.
A virus and fiscal clout are the weapons of choice...EU China and USA have....most others don't so u need to be on a team.
Ant...
The USA does not control the UK's nuclear weapons chain of command.
The USA does not control the UK's nuclear weapons chain of command.
Very unlikely, it all depends how long it takes to get a trade deal with others, however starting on WTO terms puts you on the back foot from day one and does not leave you in a very strong negotiating position.
And you really think the UK will sally forth with it's own nuclear war against some unfortunate country. We only do something big with US blessing and that has always been the case since Suez.
France has already built the lorry parks, customs facilities and even the restaurants. Douane have increased in number, many more being trained.
Do you still think the EU will back down?
France has already built the lorry parks, customs facilities and even the restaurants. Douane have increased in number, many more being trained.
Do you still think the EU will back down?
The French had a full test of their customs system over a year ago in preparation for no withdrawal deal happening. The UK hasn't even specced, let a loan written some of the systems they need.
What are you on about?
You harp on about how the WTO is meaningless, yet dozens of countries are signed up to it?
The UK consumer market is vast. The government has intimated at length that it will be looking to extend bilateral free trade deals with interested parties. I can't write that more times than I already have.
I know you live in upside down land but that is a bloody big cherry dandling down for anyone interested in making a shilling from it. The EU has not offered the same to anyone outside of Europe, nor has the USA. What, you suppose India won't look for a slice of that action for fear we will bury them in cheap clothes manufactured in child sweatshops because of the total lack of labour laws in the UK? You reckon other countries won't want to do a deal because of the UK's reputation for churning out goods with poor product safety and a lack of compliance with environmental protection laws?
Come off it.
Your hilarious. Whatever your train of thought, your humours comments makes for interesting reading in these dull timesIs it Cummings?