10,000 hour plus tractors

oil barron

Member
Location
Aberdeenshire
Surely there's been a change since then? That seems an awful long time ago. Seem to remember being fairly young back then.:eek:
I know where does the time go. 15 years ago you were educating us all on BFF on the various back end oil options and keeping that angry bloke who liked to host shooting parties right. I think we had a debate on Powerstar engine balancers around 07. But no it’s been the same blue since 01.

Original ford blue
4A005239-2E58-48D8-A5ED-FBFA5E57AB8B.jpeg

Newholland blue with grey chassis 2001
F1115291-C1C6-47AF-A076-EECE1F9D1F9A.jpeg

Newholland blue with black chassis 02
861BC59C-1BA9-41B9-BD76-C1C870AC48AB.jpeg

yellow flash 05
649B93FD-5BFC-4C0A-A856-5DADAF4CF76F.jpeg

white flash 03
1B4EA2A3-54EA-4485-98D9-4D53EC5C6D1C.jpeg
 

Drillman

Member
Mixed Farmer
I know where does the time go. 15 years ago you were educating us all on BFF on the various back end oil options and keeping that angry bloke who liked to host shooting parties right. I think we had a debate on Powerstar engine balancers around 07. But no it’s been the same blue since 01.

Original ford blue
View attachment 853400
Newholland blue with grey chassis 2001
View attachment 853401
Newholland blue with black chassis 02
View attachment 853402
yellow flash 05
View attachment 853403
white flash 03
View attachment 853404
Yes that’s correct for paint.

TM135-140-150-155-165 all had same backend with same lift capacity if twin assist or rams were fitted.

TM150 and up had heavier front axle. Easy way to tell is the bigger front hubs. For reference the 135 and 140 had a 9 ton chassis rating. 150-155-165 had 10 ton chassis rating.

there was also the 165 ultra which had bar axles and 42 inch rims. I don’t know a lot about that model to be fair. But would guess it’s lift capacity and/or chassis rating may have been higher.

TM135 morphed into the TM140 with the addition of an Intercooler. The 135 was actually only 125hp. The TM140 is the power on the sticker. Unless 10mm remap been done

TM150 (actually 140hp) was replaced with the TM155 (155hp) again with an interestingly the 140 and 155 models had fuel tanks 20 litre smaller than the older versions due to battery relocation under the cab steps to make room for the intercooler. I honestly also believe the older ones were better nailed together. As build quality took a hit after the case merger due to the sheer amount of tractors been churned out of Basildon!

the 165 was replaced effectively with the LWB 175 with the 190 added on top.
 
Last edited:

Cowabunga

Member
Location
Ceredigion,Wales
Yes that’s correct for paint.

TM135-140-150-155-165 all had same backend with same lift capacity if twin assist or rams were fitted.

.
8260, 8360, 8560 all had different size back axles. The 8560 has markedly bigger epicyclic reduction gears at the back but shares the same heavy duty front axle with the 8360. The 8360 is equivalent to the TM150 in power and duty but with only one assist ram as standard.
 

Drillman

Member
Mixed Farmer
8260, 8360, 8560 all had different size back axles. The 8560 has markedly bigger epicyclic reduction gears at the back but shares the same heavy duty front axle with the 8360. The 8360 is equivalent to the TM150 in power and duty but with only one assist ram as standard.
8360 was actually 135hp and TM150 140hp but otherwise would say your probably right.
 

Cowabunga

Member
Location
Ceredigion,Wales
8360 was actually 135hp and TM150 140hp but otherwise would say your probably right.
I doubt whether there was actually any difference in power. My 8360 has always put out 144hp at the shaft. Way more than advertised and not tweaked. Pulling slurry tankers up the same hills it goes at exactly the same speed as my Titan, which is 160 at the shaft and the vario MF which is 177 at the shaft.
This suggests that the Range Command transmission is really quite efficient on the road, even when all the tractors are pulled down to 13kph by the load. I'm very pleased with the NH and it still goes like new.
 

Drillman

Member
Mixed Farmer
I doubt whether there was actually any difference in power. My 8360 has always put out 144hp at the shaft. Way more than advertised and not tweaked. Pulling slurry tankers up the same hills it goes at exactly the same speed as my Titan, which is 160 at the shaft and the vario MF which is 177 at the shaft.
This suggests that the Range Command transmission is really quite efficient on the road, even when all the tractors are pulled down to 13kph by the load. I'm very pleased with the NH and it still goes like new.
I’m quoting brochure figure. It’s well known that the powerstar is a good performer especially if you let the torque do the work!
 

oil barron

Member
Location
Aberdeenshire
Yes that’s correct for paint.

TM135-140-150-155-165 all had same backend with same lift capacity if twin assist or rams were fitted.

TM150 and up had heavier front axle. Easy way to tell is the bigger front hubs. For reference the 135 and 140 had a 9 ton chassis rating. 150-155-165 had 10 ton chassis rating.

there was also the 165 ultra which had bar axles and 42 inch rims. I don’t know a lot about that model to be fair. But would guess it’s lift capacity and/or chassis rating may have been higher.

TM135 morphed into the TM140 with the addition of an Intercooler. The 135 was actually only 125hp. The TM140 is the power on the sticker. Unless 10mm remap been done

TM150 (actually 140hp) was replaced with the TM155 (155hp) again with an interestingly the 140 and 155 models had fuel tanks 20 litre smaller than the older versions due to battery relocation under the cab steps to make room for the intercooler. I honestly also believe the older ones were better nailed together. As build quality took a hit after the case merger due to the sheer amount of tractors been churned out of Basildon!

the 165 was replaced effectively with the LWB 175 with the 190 added on top.

I think you are quoting DIN horsepower for the mark 1 TMs and ISO horsepower for the mark 11 TMs. Newholland changed the way it reported horsepower in the brochures at this time.
 

Two Tone

Member
Mixed Farmer
I’ve got these 2 old girls that have both done over 10,000 hrs
780638D0-17C1-4EFD-B9E7-9D850D7FF0D2.jpeg

I didn’t buy them new. I bought them 4 years ago and they have both been pretty reliable.
The 8340 is 1995 and the 7740 is 1993.
You get a few problems mostly with oil pressure sensors that start to leak, but are easily replaced.
Both are SLE models and it is good practice to recalibrate the gear changes every year.
The engines are bomb proof.

I replaced a couple of old Masseys (3080 and a 6180) with them that were quite unreliable despite having many 1,000’s of hour less.

These Fords/NH’s are my pride and joy and I actually prefer driving these than my main 2 tractors.

EDIT
Both were Dyno tested a couple of years ago and found to be well over the rated Horsepowers by 10 - 20 HP
Every other make bar JCB that were tested that day were well under what they were supposed to be.
 

Attachments

  • C65FF24E-AF3C-441D-9B52-64C9178ADA8F.jpeg
    C65FF24E-AF3C-441D-9B52-64C9178ADA8F.jpeg
    443.8 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
I doubt whether there was actually any difference in power. My 8360 has always put out 144hp at the shaft. Way more than advertised and not tweaked. Pulling slurry tankers up the same hills it goes at exactly the same speed as my Titan, which is 160 at the shaft and the vario MF which is 177 at the shaft.
This suggests that the Range Command transmission is really quite efficient on the road, even when all the tractors are pulled down to 13kph by the load. I'm very pleased with the NH and it still goes like new.
Isn't range command A simple gear box in the sense v the power command when it comes to maintaining it ?
 

Davy

Member
Location
North NI
Have an 8360, TM 150 and TM 155 here. Out of them all, the 8360 has had the least work needing done to it in its time with us in the form of a damper plate. Bloody thing just keeps going, 14000hrs. The other 2 are good buses too right enough. They all pull the same, though there would be more horses in them now than when they left the factory?
 
I’ve got these 2 old girls that have both done over 10,000 hrs
View attachment 853498
I didn’t buy them new. I bought them 4 years ago and they have both been pretty reliable.
The 8340 is 1995 and the 7740 is 1993.
You get a few problems mostly with oil pressure sensors that start to leak, but are easily replaced.
Both are SLE models and it is good practice to recalibrate the gear changes every year.
The engines are bomb proof.

I replaced a couple of old Masseys (3080 and a 6180) with them that were quite unreliable despite having many 1,000’s of hour less.

These Fords/NH’s are my pride and joy and I actually prefer driving these than my main 2 tractors.

EDIT
Both were Dyno tested a couple of years ago and found to be well over the rated Horsepowers by 10 - 20 HP
Every other make bar JCB that were tested that day were well under what they were supposed to be.
Nice fleet you have
 

Spear

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
North Devon
Valmet 705 1987 24000 ish hrs. Clock stopped for a while the started again.
Done last 8k on diet feeder.

Set of front ujs, brake pipe, a pto clutch pack, brake slave cylinder sealsx3. Engine had new liners and rings at 9k because we thought it would need them(was wrong).
New seat.

Valtra 8050. S reg. 14k

New air con unit, hydraulic pump,pto main bearing. New linkage stabilisers. Slave and master brake cylinder seals. 4wd clutch pack.
 

SFI - What % were you taking out of production?

  • 0 %

    Votes: 105 40.5%
  • Up to 25%

    Votes: 94 36.3%
  • 25-50%

    Votes: 39 15.1%
  • 50-75%

    Votes: 5 1.9%
  • 75-100%

    Votes: 3 1.2%
  • 100% I’ve had enough of farming!

    Votes: 13 5.0%

May Event: The most profitable farm diversification strategy 2024 - Mobile Data Centres

  • 1,821
  • 32
With just a internet connection and a plug socket you too can join over 70 farms currently earning up to £1.27 ppkw ~ 201% ROI

Register Here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/the-mo...2024-mobile-data-centres-tickets-871045770347

Tuesday, May 21 · 10am - 2pm GMT+1

Location: Village Hotel Bury, Rochdale Road, Bury, BL9 7BQ

The Farming Forum has teamed up with the award winning hardware manufacturer Easy Compute to bring you an educational talk about how AI and blockchain technology is helping farmers to diversify their land.

Over the past 7 years, Easy Compute have been working with farmers, agricultural businesses, and renewable energy farms all across the UK to help turn leftover space into mini data centres. With...
Top