tullah
Member
- Location
- Linconshire
Frightening but it’s not RT who are going out of their way to destroy us but the owners of RT. After all the digging by the team here,After a lot of fuss, we did see some ever so slight push back to the proposed new rules at the RT consultation. It needs a lot more though - some major structural changes.
Maybe see farmer board reps voted on by the farmer members? Would that work?
One ever so slight change in the cereal sector would be a good start (remove the mandatory imposition on feed mills to be compelled to only purchase RT grain).
Oh, and a few more bits. Like why is RT 12 month sprayer testing, but SQC is 36 months.
And why add in the bit about H&S policy. H&S is important, no problem with that, but not the remit of Assured Food Standards.
...and their desire to police ELMS. Geez. Trying to position themselves as a mandatory and monopoly one stop shop "licence to farm". That showed their true colours of how they work, making it impossible for farmers to operate without paying RT.
They've constantly worked to corner farmers and cut off markets unless we all pay up. All backed by NFU and AHDB.
Free markets anyone?
lo and behold the non farming union turn out to be the owners.
The non farming union own and operate this so called assurance company under the guise of RT when it’s in actual fact owned by the non farming union. I run a farming company and I’m proud to associate myself with it.
Who would believe this state of affaires?