• Welcome to The Farming Forum!

    As part of this update, we have made a change to the login and registration process. If you are experiences any problems, please email [email protected] with the details so we can resolve any issues.

Countryfile tonight

DRC

Member
I bet it's all in HLS. Add the SFP and they'll be getting £150/acre, plus probably farming tourists and cottages etc.
3500 × £150 =£525000.
 

ZXR17

Member
Location
South Dorset
I used to do all the spraying on Knepp when it was still a profitable estate with 2 dairy units and decent size arable enterprise. It used to be a lovely Sussex weald estate, a lot of small fields though, with good productive ground.
What a waste. It's a bloody mess now.
Each to their own ideas I suppose.
 
Fair do's, the bTB coverage tonight was very good. Two strongly pro cull (it's definitely working), followed by Dom Dyer who at least was unable to spout his lies about 'ten minutes to die....blah blah blah...' followed by a piece on biosecurity which was entirely about keeping badgers out of yards and cattle sheds.

Nice one, Countryfile - and I don't often say that. (y)
 
haven't seen it are there really actual stats stating that? find it hard to believe given the carnage going on around here.

Drop of 58 percent new breakdowns in the Glos cull area compared to several non cull areas. Somerset a drop of 21 percent.

In one survey they did not count herds going clear after a cull, if they had been under TB2 at the beginning. As daft as that may sound. And taken to a logical conclusion, if they had all been under TB2 at the start, then no benefit would be logged as they went clear.

Interesting that so much money put into biosecurity - not for cattle but to keep badgers away from cattle yards, feed and water. Grazed grass? They forgot that. :banghead:
 
Last edited:
Drop of 58 percent new breakdowns in the Glos cull area compared to several non cull areas. Somerset a drop of 21 percent.

In one survey they did not count herds going clear after a cull, if they had been under TB2 at the beginning. As daft as that may sound. And taken to a logical conclusion, if they had all been under TB2 at the start, then no benefit would be logged as they went clear.

Interesting that so much money put into biosecurity - not for cattle but to keep badgers away from cattle yards, feed and water. Grazed grass? They forgot that. :banghead:
In north Dorset the blood test is causing havoke. Heard of one place where the blood test was done and animals removed. Following skin test threw up a double Inconclusive so blood test was repeated 6 weeks after the first and more failed the bloods second time round than failed the first.
 
In north Dorset the blood test is causing havoke. Heard of one place where the blood test was done and animals removed. Following skin test threw up a double Inconclusive so blood test was repeated 6 weeks after the first and more failed the bloods second time round than failed the first.

I'm not surprised. Gamma ifn is a blunt instrument.
It is not used in some EU countries as a primary test. Any positives are isolated and confirmed with a skin test for that reason.

There are no depths this government will not plumb, to kill more cattle, but leave infectious badgers scattered by their current gatling gun approach to disease control.
 

steveR

Member
Mixed Farmer
Interesting that so much money put into biosecurity - not for cattle but to keep badgers away from cattle yards, feed and water. Grazed grass? They forgot that. :banghead:

Every time... I had a "discussion" some years ago about biosecurity from a Ministry wallah and decided then that the advice, was well meaning but complete drivel...

"Keep the badger from drinking at a water trough as they might dribble into the water...". Then 20 secs later it's peeing and a crapping and a digging up the grassland.
 
Every time... I had a "discussion" some years ago about biosecurity from a Ministry wallah and decided then that the advice, was well meaning but complete drivel...

"Keep the badger from drinking at a water trough as they might dribble into the water...". Then 20 secs later it's peeing and a crapping and a digging up the grassland.

It always amuses me the recommended height of feed troughs. The figures given are rubbish when you look at Prof. Tim Roper’s Videos. Badgers swung their bums in at 4’ 3” . At which height, cattle couldn’t eat. Giraffes?

Spot bloody on as always (y)

Sad isn’t it?
 

RobFZS

Member
Fair do's, the bTB coverage tonight was very good. Two strongly pro cull (it's definitely working), followed by Dom Dyer who at least was unable to spout his lies about 'ten minutes to die....blah blah blah...' followed by a piece on biosecurity which was entirely about keeping badgers out of yards and cattle sheds.

Nice one, Countryfile - and I don't often say that. (y)
General public must think it's absurd that you have to turn your farm in to a fortress to keep out badgers spreading TB
 

How is your SFI 24 application progressing?

  • havn't been invited to apply

    Votes: 29 34.5%
  • have been invited to apply

    Votes: 17 20.2%
  • applied but not yet accepted

    Votes: 29 34.5%
  • agreement up and running

    Votes: 9 10.7%

Webinar: Expanded Sustainable Farming Incentive offer 2024 -26th Sept

  • 2,518
  • 50
On Thursday 26th September, we’re holding a webinar for farmers to go through the guidance, actions and detail for the expanded Sustainable Farming Incentive (SFI) offer. This was planned for end of May, but had to be delayed due to the general election. We apologise about that.

Farming and Countryside Programme Director, Janet Hughes will be joined by policy leads working on SFI, and colleagues from the Rural Payment Agency and Catchment Sensitive Farming.

This webinar will be...
Back
Top