Cowabunga
Member
- Location
- Ceredigion,Wales
Worth the effort to listen to this sensible commentary to the end.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But ELMS doesn't fit everyone .Can't comment on his assessment of the politics of it all ( not really interested tbh), but just on a practical point, he says that BPS is going but doesn't mention its replacement with ELMS.
Whether that is because he doesn't know about ELMS, or mentioning it would get in the way of his narrative, who knows (or cares ? ) .
The problem is that a majority of farmers supported and indeed continue supporting the dismantling of their businesses and potential loss of their family homes. The NFU is proving categorically that its initials stand for No Fücking Use, just in case anyone was in any doubt perviously, but what can they do when a whole lot of their members are turkeys voting for Christmas?I dont know why its coming as such a surprise in our new post EU era. At least the French would kick up a stink and stand up for what they believed in which offered us a degree of protection within the EU.
You stick your head in the sand with the rest of them and see where it gets you.Here comes Ducky again
Dooooooooooooooooom Gloooooooooooooooooooooom
Its because its total budget is going to be less than half the BPS and is aimed at cutting production and that means cutting farmer's income by adding costs and restrictions while giving other countries our market.Can't comment on his assessment of the politics of it all ( not really interested tbh), but just on a practical point, he says that BPS is going but doesn't mention its replacement with ELMS.
Whether that is because he doesn't know about ELMS, or mentioning it would get in the way of his narrative, who knows (or cares ? ) .
If you don't like my verdict that is your problemYou stick your head in the sand with the rest of them and see where it gets you.
If you don't like mine, that is your problem.If you don't like my verdict that is your problem
I'd you cant stand the heat get out of the kitchen, the solution is in the farmers hands, for dairy it started when the mmb was ended, dairy farmers all had the chance to join MM and keep the upper hand, too many sold out their own future for a penny a litre, I saw the end game and gave up in 98, sold my quota for a fortune and diversified into non food production, quite a few round here now sell their milk direct, there is a bright future for those farmers who look beyond their own gate. Those that moan and cry are finished unless they get a gripIts because its total budget is going to be less than half the BPS and is aimed at cutting production and that means cutting farmer's income by adding costs and restrictions while giving other countries our market.
The competition is not just about free trade of course. There are other even more negative indicators such as the ones discussed at length already, such as the zero emissions targeting animals in particular, plus the advent and promotion of 'eat less meat' which actually aims at 'eat no meat' which coincides with the introduction of fake meat products.
I just did if you don't like it stick it where the sun don't shineIf you don't like mine, that is your problem.
Act your age not your shoe size.
Come back when you have a significant intelligent contribution to make. That'll take a few years by the sound of it.
Where is the problem ? Your all better off than in the last thirty years .someone on this forum warned you all about handing power from the EU to westminster before the brexit vote! but you all wanted to "take back control"
Ansew the qusetin ducky why are you still farming when you know its Dooooooooooooooomed ?If you don't like mine, that is your problem.
Act your age not your shoe size.
Come back when you have a significant intelligent contribution to make. That'll take a few years by the sound of it.
I've listened to Dieter Helm's Audible book (well about 19 hours in) and in amongst the repetitive get the polluter (farmer) to pay for his damages to the environment, this Oxford academic and learned economist is constantly saying "with sheep and other marginal farming activities hardly being profitable let's re-wild much of Britain and save the planet". His assumption is that only some farmers can afford the new costs of compliance with ever more stringent regulation and a watchful educated consumer public. I note his PA's email address is listed on the e-packaging and I'm all for emailing him and just stating what might be the fatal flaw in his argument : if you don't get your food from this Country are you in danger of assuming there is a massive surplus produced to your ever more exacting standards elsewhere?Its because its total budget is going to be less than half the BPS and is aimed at cutting production and that means cutting farmer's income by adding costs and restrictions while giving other countries our market.
The competition is not just about free trade of course. There are other even more negative indicators such as the ones discussed at length already, such as the zero emissions targeting animals in particular, plus the advent and promotion of 'eat less meat' which actually aims at 'eat no meat' which coincides with the introduction of fake meat products.