House of Lords votes to ban lower standard food imports

[jackrussell101]

Lords vote to protect farmers from substandard food imports - Farmers Weekly

The government is coming under more pressure to ban food imports that do not match UK standards, following historic votes in the House of Lords on Tuesday

www.fwi.co.uk

 

[jackrussell101]

Does that mean that the House of Commons will have to amend the agricultural bill now or not?

 

[steveR]

Should hopefully put serious pressure on the Govt, especially that dreadful woman, Truss.

One, proposed by Lord Granchester, sought a “requirement for agricultural and food imports to meet domestic standards” and was supported by 307 members, compared with 212 who opposed it.

Disappointing that 212 Members, felt that lower standards were acceptable!

 

[Roger Perry]

Just a smokescreen to protect domestic production. (cannot blame you guys for that)
Always' singling out the same two products, saying they are the "tip of the iceberg" trying to con consumers into thinking its' dangerous to your health if eaten.
Be aware though that trade is a two way street and feel sure that it will be noted in Washington.

 

[C.J]

Just a smokescreen to protect domestic production. (cannot blame you guys for that)
Always' singling out the same two products, saying they are the "tip of the iceberg" trying to con consumers into thinking its' dangerous to your health if eaten.
Be aware though that trade is a two way street and feel sure that it will be noted in Washington.

Do you have any laws,tariffs or bans to prevent south american meat undercutting the price of U.S meat ?

Or Canadian corn undercutting U.S corn ?

 

[Highland Mule]

The US won’t allow haggis imports.

 

[Tim G]

The US won’t allow haggis imports.

Or brie,
or kinder eggs apparently.

 

[britt]

Just a smokescreen to protect domestic production. (cannot blame you guys for that)
Always' singling out the same two products, saying they are the "tip of the iceberg" trying to con consumers into thinking its' dangerous to your health if eaten.
Be aware though that trade is a two way street and feel sure that it will be noted in Washington.

We are net importer of food, cheep imports will do us far more harm than a lack of niche high end exports (which are more able to stand a bit of tariff).

 

[deleted user 837354]

Just a smokescreen to protect domestic production. (cannot blame you guys for that)
Always' singling out the same two products, saying they are the "tip of the iceberg" trying to con consumers into thinking its' dangerous to your health if eaten.
Be aware though that trade is a two way street and feel sure that it will be noted in Washington.

Ah, so you are in favour of cheap Chinese steel and aluminium imports into the USA?

European cars?

 

[Highland Mule]

Or brie,
or kinder eggs apparently.

Kinder eggs not allowed on safety grounds, apparently. But AK-47s are grand.

 

[steveR]

Just a smokescreen to protect domestic production. (cannot blame you guys for that)
Always' singling out the same two products, saying they are the "tip of the iceberg" trying to con consumers into thinking its' dangerous to your health if eaten.
Be aware though that trade is a two way street and feel sure that it will be noted in Washington.

Well personally, I would also add any GM Maize to those two products. But there you go....

The pertinent proposal was “a requirement for agricultural and food imports to meet domestic standards”

It's a pity a few of the Politicos here in the Tory party didn't take on board that viewpoint of Washington, well before rushing headlong into a TA with the USA. But water under the Bridge I fear.

 

[GeorgeK]

If lower standard imports were banned it would hit huge quantities of imports we already rely on to keep food prices cheap, can't see that happening unfortunately.
The government will duly respond in the traditional opaque fashion with a statement that doesn't mean anything, something along the lines of:
"Let me be ABSOLOUTELY CLEAR, this government is FULLY COMMITTED to protecting our WORLD LEADING standards of FOOD PRODUCTION and ANIMAL WELFARE"
(Note that although this sounds impressive they are probably only referring to maintaining domestic production standards, not those of imports)

 

[Roger Perry]

Ah, so you are in favour of cheap Chinese steel and aluminium imports into the USA?

European cars?

We are talking about falshoods concerning US agricultural products.
Tariffs on steel...whatever I cannot comment but this "lower standards" on U.S. food is just an outright lie.

 

[Roger Perry]

Do you have any laws,tariffs or bans to prevent south american meat undercutting the price of U.S meat ?

Or Canadian corn undercutting U.S corn ?

Not aware of any..?

 

[MRT]

The US won’t allow haggis imports.

I hear USA produce haggis with equal sized legs, how can we compete?

 

[steveR]

We are talking about falshoods concerning US agricultural products.
Tariffs on steel...whatever I cannot comment but this "lower standards" on U.S. food is just an outright lie.

Not really Roger. The crux of the matter, is that US agriculture is carrying out production practices which are illegal here. I can still recall the amazed response on a big MT ranch when I said that the "pellet in the ear" of young cattle, would put me in Prison in the UK!

Whether it is a "lower standard" is a matter, I believe, of semantics.

 

[Highland Mule]

this "lower standards" on U.S. food is just an outright lie

No, it's not. Chicken is chlorine washed because it needs to be - the production and processing standards with respect to hygiene are lower in the US and if it wasn't washed then the consumer would have far greater risk of food poisoning. As it is, the prevalence of food poisoning is still higher out there than here.

 

[PercyBlakeney]

Does that mean that the House of Commons will have to amend the agricultural bill now or not?

To answer your question @jackrussell101 - Not necessarily - the House of Commons will consider the amendments (although there is still one more stage to go through in the House of Lords first), then either accept, reject or modify amendments. The bill then goes back and forth between the two houses (genuinely known as ping ponging) until the final text is agreed and can be granted royal assent. So although the amendment is significant, doesn't necessarily mean it will make it into the final text of the bill.

 

[snarling bee]

I read a recent report that the US pig industry uses 7 times the antibiotics per pig than the Danes, Dutch and us in the UK. The US is also almost unique in the world in not cutting back at all on antibiotic use in the pig industry.
Shame on them.

 

[deleted user 837354]

We are talking about falshoods concerning US agricultural products.
Tariffs on steel...whatever I cannot comment but this "lower standards" on U.S. food is just an outright lie.

The principle is the same. US govt complains about importing Chinese products all the time.