Hilly
Member
- Location
- Scottish Borders.
Why?Be nice just to have a dual carraigeway up the A1 to scotland first thats been delayed & delayed & we all know why.
Why?Be nice just to have a dual carraigeway up the A1 to scotland first thats been delayed & delayed & we all know why.
Don’t worry no one is actually going to do any of this! People who work in the service of others are mugs, turkeys who repeatedly vote for Christmas.There are many folk not in the public services equally deserving. Public service pay and conditions are not at all bad when all is considered.
That is what you have inferred from my post. It is not what I wrote.
Crikey, I'm on message with our esteemed proprietor ( see post #210 ).longest street in the uk
here’s an idea ? why not just throw some tarmac down and have another motorway straight to the capital
Current market value as determined by the disposing "department's professionally qualified valuer" according to:not 109% sure on how they value it but it dies have to be offered back to the compulsory purchase owner first
there is a good argument it’s worth less now as been derelict for a while and now forever blighted by threat of a hs2 revival ?
I suggest with respect you conveniently ignore capital appreciation and removal of housing stock from market, similar to second, third homes. Don't worry no political party is going to change anything. Just irritates that the spiralling housing benefit bill is not seen in context of driving prices and shortage of housing for new and young entrants.you suggest the housing benifit makes private landlords fortunes ? and therefore i assume you suggest the benifit bill would be lower without that private profit ?
well, councils would not run housing cheaper than private landlords and private landlords are not making fortunes with interest rates at current levels
i have a couple of ‘84 rent act properties, they rent at less than 50% of market value. - i would suggest i am personally subsidising the government’s housing benefit budget right there - i would be more than happy to sell those properties to the local council at market value !
I suggest with respect you conveniently ignore capital appreciation and removal of housing stock from market, similar to second, third homes. Don't worry no political party is going to change anything. Just irritates that the spiralling housing benefit bill is not seen in context of driving prices and shortage of housing for new and young entrants.
you suggest the housing benifit makes private landlords fortunes ? and therefore i assume you suggest the benifit bill would be lower without that private profit ?
well, councils would not run housing cheaper than private landlords and private landlords are not making fortunes with interest rates at current levels
i have a couple of ‘84 rent act properties, they rent at less than 50% of market value. - i would suggest i am personally subsidising the government’s housing benefit budget right there - i would be more than happy to sell those properties to the local council at market value !
the solution to reduce housing benefit is to stop being so tolerant of people who choose not to work and want a free ride through life
privately owned housing stock will always be cheaper than council owned houses ……. as a council can turn buying a box of paper clips into a million £ tender !
right now property is depreciating and rents hardly cover cost of the money. ……. i don’t think private landlords are raking it in any longer as was also the case through almost any historical period other than the last 20 years
The inhabitants of Downing Street live in a social media bubble. Surely Clive must know this? This makes his comments on housing benefit all the more inexplicable.Timing Clive, timing. Buy to let bought 15 years ago has appreciated substantially even if value currently is reducing. As a farmer you may be aware of timing in regards to value of wheat?
I can think of many groups of ordinary working folk who rent Who are in receipt of housing benefit. They are nice, normal people, doing ordinary jobs. I am surprised you wrote that, though it is what I expect from a number of TFF contributors. Bash the skivers and shirkers. You weren’t at the Tory conference were you, or just on message from your recent visit the Downing Street. Cheers.
Timing Clive, timing. Buy to let bought 15 years ago has appreciated substantially even if value currently is reducing. As a farmer you may be aware of timing in regards to value of wheat?
I can think of many groups of ordinary working folk who rent Who are in receipt of housing benefit. They are nice, normal people, doing ordinary jobs. I am surprised you wrote that, though it is what I expect from a number of TFF contributors. Bash the skivers and shirkers. You weren’t at the Tory conference were you, or just on message from your recent visit the Downing Street. Cheers.
Timing Clive, timing. Buy to let bought 15 years ago has appreciated substantially even if value currently is reducing. As a farmer you may be aware of timing in regards to value of wheat?
I can think of many groups of ordinary working folk who rent Who are in receipt of housing benefit. They are nice, normal people, doing ordinary jobs. I am surprised you wrote that, though it is what I expect from a number of TFF contributors. Bash the skivers and shirkers. You weren’t at the Tory conference were you, or just on message from your recent visit the Downing Street. Cheers.
timing is everything easy ……… when you have your username !
It would be interesting to see those bars split out to show the relative costs of building tracks vs the costs of compulsory purchase of the land and property along the route.
timing is everything easy ……… when you have your username !
but is it the civil servants? It is the minister who makes the decisions, the civil servants just lay down the options.The government has U turned on the second leg of HS2 because of the spiralling costs which is probably down to mismanagement by HS2 Ltd and the Government.
How long before they scrap or curtail the new environmental schemes because of spiralling costs caused by the same mismanagement and oversights.
It doesn't exactly give you confidence in the decision making capabilities of these civil servants.
Dont the civil servants lay down the options having done the research and calcs? If these are not done correctly.............but is it the civil servants? It is the minister who makes the decisions, the civil servants just lay down the options.
You say people need less nanny state and more work ethic to earn their own home.
Did you work and earn everything you own?