So your rent is about £70 acre this year then, which is quite a bit less than my AHA rent.
Everyone seems to think that those of us on AHA are getting it for a lot less than we really are. @statics £150 isn't double what we are paying. Not moaning, just stating facts.
the rent is cheap yes compared to averages - it has to be as this land is low quality with very low yield potential, ex opencast, poorly drained, terrible indices, low OM, exposed etc. and no one is willing to invest in it or offer tenure longer than a couple of years at a time, rent surely should reflect that potential ? if it was 4t barley land I would probably be paying double or more but the extra tonne would cover that
i'm not into silly rents and never have been (contrary to some local speculation I expect !) , they are pointless, and I will walk where landlords demand them, I do nothing I can't see a margin in