Old McDonald
Member
- Location
- Harray, Orkney
Anything he says or states about our understanding of, and the attempted modelling of, the mechanisms of climate change, is much more likely to be correct than incorrect.
Up to a point I agree with that. His intellect is not in doubt, nor I think, has anyone on here queried his undoubted knowledge and achievements.
I am not a fan of modelling, primarily because it is necessary to know whether the modeller is taking the stance of this is going to happen, or, it is possible this will happen if X Y and Z occur/do not occur. Without the text to accompany the inivetable graphs and charts which will be repeatedly put on forums like this for years, it is not possible to know what the modeller's stance is.
My complaint about Dyson is the things he chooses not to say about the recent and ongoing temperature rises, increasing CO2 in the air, and particularly the oceans, the latter giving rise to accelerating sea level rises.