Wellytrack
Member
Let’s take it slowly. Did Putin invade Yes or no. Would you trust Putin to adhere to a deal, Yes or no.
The war in Ukraine...
- Thread starter Danllan
- Start date
Let’s take it slowly. Did Putin invade Yes or no. Would you trust Putin to adhere to a deal, Yes or no.
Danllan
Member
- Location
- Sir Gar / Carms
Hmm... I think that Mikhail Gorbachev was a fairly decent fellow; it is a great shame that his charisma didn't match his wisdom - although, clearly, he wasn't fully up to speed in re Putin. Had it done so, Russia and the World would probably be pretty different now, and almost certainly both for the better.
It is rather unnerving that for its second half, the government of the Soviet Union, for all its faults, was a more stable and accountable organisation than that currently running Russia. It would have been entirely impossible for any First Secretary alone to have had the power that Putin now wields, post-Stalin the Politburo could - and did - remove anyone unstable / dangerous.
Could you trust any leader to keep to a deal, even the UK goes back on deals.
The West have continued to expand NATO closer to Russia after the break up of the Soviet Union, for what purpose?
It has been to make it very clear that we have always seen Russia as the ultimate enemy, maybe consider looking at it from the other side before this war broke out for once & imagine how you might look at what was happening?
Wellytrack
Member
Would you trust Putin?
Devil's advocate
Member
- Location
- Posh side of Barnsley
Mikhail Gorbachev - Wikipedia
First job was a combine driver
Ukranian Mother If he is alive he must be bleeding inside.
Of course not, would you trust any politician?
You think Bozo is throwing the kitchen sink at Ukraine because of his love of the Ukrainian people or whether he sees it as his means of staying in power!
Last edited:
Wellytrack
Member
Of course not, would you trust any politician?
He’s not a politician, he’s the leader of a country that ordered an invasion of another sovereign nation and you argue that Ukraine should have negotiated and compromised with this man?
He’s a politician who found a way to rig elections, something they would all like to do. Yes I do think they should have compromised as it would seem that could be a little better than the alternative!
Wellytrack
Member
You think they are enjoying the alternative?So you say he’s not to be trusted but they should have cut a deal with him?
Wellytrack
Member
Is that a reply with a question?
Hindsight
Member
- Location
- Lincolnshire
No, we have not made it clear Russia is the ultimate enemy. The expansion was at the request of those countries that has become sovereign following the collapse of the USSR. The policy has been to trade with Russia and to purchase the immense natural resources. Thus ensuring a flow of Euros and Dollars into the Kremlin coffers. The intention being this would be spent on the people, not British Football Clubs as mega yachts, but f course we allowed and actively encouraged these actions. The transgressions with war into some of the former republics and ultimately Crimea in 2014 have been looked over, swept under the carpet as Europe (UK very much included) sucked on the teat of oil and gas. And we are paying for this approach now. For toleration. The west are indeed foolish. But suppose this has been coming.
So who exactly was NATO expecting to fight, people from Mars?
Your answer is?
Wellytrack
Member
Doesn’t look like you have an answer?
Here it is again: So you say he’s not to be trusted but they should have cut a deal with him?
Yes, do you think they were better off not cutting a deal?Doesn’t look like you have an answer?
Here it is again: So you say he’s not to be trusted but they should have cut a deal with him?
Wellytrack
Member
Thats interesting. He invaded their country, you admit he isn’t to be trusted in any way but yet they would been better cutting a deal with him…
What are you now expecting them to end up with other than misery & a broken country?
Hindsight
Member
- Location
- Lincolnshire
A defensive pact doesn't expect to fight anyone.
So there was no point in keeping it then was there?