"Credit it to you Simon for doing a forecast on a farming forum, you are on a hiding to nothing."
Yeah, I must be mad
Oh dear, the dreaded 'accuracy' stats. And therein lies another tale.
Firstly, what are we measuring? When I make monthly/seasonal predictions I always stress they are guidance and subject to change. These 'guidances' are to be seen completely differently to conventional day to day forecasts. It's the trends in the guidance forecast which should be of most use, rather than the forecasts themselves. So, for example, if a long range forecast (see you have me saying 'forecast'; now ) changes day to day or week to week then confidence in that forecast must be low. If it is a consistent story the confidence in it rises.
Should you be using the longer ranges to plan day to day activities? Certainly not, but what you can do is use them to plan workloads in the coming month, i.e. I am currently thinking (could all change), somewhere mid-June for a 5 or 6 day spell of decent harvesting weather. As a farmer I'd expect you to now be thinking about contractors for that time, with a view to it possible all changing the closer we get. But at least some information is better than no information at all.
I produce monthly 'forecast' maps of temperature and rainfall for some private clients. These are amended and updated, but the originals are always available. They are available and can be used as a rough guide, but can't really be used for true accuracy figures as they aren't that sort of guide. Probably not making much sense, but I hope you understand.
You might think measuring day to day accuracy is easier. Oh, how wrong you would be! Did you know the Met Office use a guide of +/- 2C for maximum and minimum temperatures? From their website "The early morning forecast on our website is used to produce a percentage number of the times when the forecast is accurate to within +/- 2°C". Now, that means that if I predict a maximum temperature for your farm of 20C for tomorrow, if it is anywhere in the range 18 to 22C then I have been 100% accurate! Or, if I predict a minimum temperature of 2C, anywhere between 0C (a frost) and +4C (certainly no frost) is deemed accurate?
To me those figures don't stack up.
So accuracy is certainly a debate that we need to have. Ultimately, I believe it is my customers (you!) who get to say whether I am accurate or not. If we aren't accurate, you don't use us, and certainly won't pay for our forecasts.
Sorry, wittering on, but this is a topic I've struggled with for many, many years.
Best wishes,
Simon
I think your farmers weather sponsored by farmers guardian is excellent .