M-J-G
Member
I think we'll kill ourselves off by outgrowing the planet's resources before the climate kills us off.
I think we'll kill ourselves off by outgrowing the planet's resources before the climate kills us off.
Maybe less co2 driving a mile than running? Any calculations available?
Why are the same anti climate change posters on this thread the same people who are incredibly pro brexit on the brexit threads.
I bet the same ones love multiple power Harrow passes aswell.
What an insulting, insensitive comment at so many levels.If they believe what they say, They should all do the right thing for the planet and book themselves into a swiss clinic
Looking at a tall ship disappearing over the horizon, which isn't very far, brings it home to me that our planet is not all that big after all.
I think i'd rather not take the gamble on whether global warming is good and prefer to keep the climate as it is warts and all. Stability better than chaos.
What an insulting, insensitive comment at so many levels.
You should think a little about what you wrote and be deeply ashamed. Pure casual nastiness
I think the difference is that the co2 in breathing doesn't add to the overall co2 level as fossil co2 does.It's an interesting question, but no idea TBH.
Are you Mark Francois?The Climate will change whether you like it or not.
It has done for 5 BILLION years.
Only a lunatic would waste resources on attempting to stop the Earth from spinning, the rain from falling etc.
Keep your meddling hands off what is a natural process. And no I don't want the "Climate" set in aspic for a bunch of tax dodging billionaires.
There is no "Stability" with the Environmental lunatics. Just look at the flooding caused by the Environment Agency in Somerset which decided to follow policies which led to every living thing in 20,000 Hectares to be killed.
Are you Mark Francois?
I think the difference is that the co2 in breathing doesn't add to the overall co2 level as fossil co2 does.
YesAre you Will Self ?
The Climate will change whether you like it or not.
It has done for 5 BILLION years.
Only a lunatic would waste resources on attempting to stop the Earth from spinning, the rain from falling etc.
Keep your meddling hands off what is a natural process. And no I don't want the "Climate" set in aspic for a bunch of tax dodging billionaires.
There is no "Stability" with the Environmental lunatics. Just look at the flooding caused by the Environment Agency in Somerset which decided to follow policies which led to every living thing in 20,000 Hectares to be killed.
My understanding of batteries certainly extends to appreciating that the chemistry of molten metals is somewhat different to that of the same metals in solid or compound form. I see no evidence that solid state sodium batteries offer the same performance in terms of energy density as molten sodium batteries. Can you demonstrate otherwise?
I finally understand you have difficulty in reading. I state what the improvement in sodium batteries are reducing the temperature down from the tried and tested 300C down to room temperature but then you cannot see any evidence because you cannot be bothered to look even though you have been told the evidence exists by a simple google.