Wellytrack
Member
Why would anyone fix an error that gives 4 times the economy?
So what happened
- Thread starter Speedstar
- Start date
Frankzy
Member
- Location
- Jamtland, Sweden
Why would they not instantly apply it to all their tractors in stock and also charge existing ones 5k to upgrade?
Mouser
Member
- Location
- near Belfast
f**k that is f**king funny, you just couldn't make it up!I believe this is the original thread.
JCB 3220 v 50 km
which is more effecient on fuel , a fastrack or a 50 km tractor both of the same power. Doing long distance road work.thefarmingforum.co.uk
Suckndiesel
Member
- Location
- Newtownards
Well they would but opec wouldn’t allow it so they can sell more oil, it’s a damn conspiracy!
Wellytrack
Member
The last non planned error as good, or as profitable or as remarkable a discovery as that in recent times was the side effect reported in patients being treated with a new test drug from Pfizer for hypertension..................
The Green Party would end up selling fendt tractors to save the planet if it was true. Even mad Boris would be promoting fendt 939s.
ollie989898
Member
I can confirm that this tablet does not seem to work on women, at least not with 100% efficacy.
ollie989898
Member
I never did find out about that horse, either. I presume someone made 10,000 Lasagnes out of it?
- Location
- Worcestershire
Thanks, very interesting read that was [emoji23] is there going to be a series 2? Did proof ever get given of the fendt doing 29mpg, did holywel get a cab for his dumper and tell speedstar of his undying love for himI believe this is the original thread.
JCB 3220 v 50 km
which is more effecient on fuel , a fastrack or a 50 km tractor both of the same power. Doing long distance road work.
Last edited:
You can't prove nonsense.
Mouser
Member
- Location
- near Belfast
You can prove it to be nonsense though
Speedstar
Member
- Location
- Scottish Borders
Before you call me this and that read about a fendt 1000 range and what does it do on the road with the engine rpms and we all know low rpms can not burn fuel
Wellytrack
Member
Five times less fuel though. If Peugeot announced their latest 508 HDI was returning 300 MPG and able to prove it scrap yards would be built to the sky with anything not a Peugeot HDI.
Hell for that matter the government would ban the sale of anything else burning fuel.
BDBed
Member
- Location
- Melton Mowbray
What amazes me is how people have lost the ability to know when it is better to say nothing. Although this has been very entertaining not an ideal advert for the farming community on a public platform.
One bit of advice given to me as a youngster that has stayed with me is that you are the master of your unspoken words.
One bit of advice given to me as a youngster that has stayed with me is that you are the master of your unspoken words.
Frankzy
Member
- Location
- Jamtland, Sweden
Doesn't matter if the engine is revving 1000 or 1400, it still has to produce the same amount of energy, are you saying that the engine+tranny gets more than 300% more efficient by dropping down a few hundred rpms?
Besides this was a 939 why are you talking about the 1000 series?
Speedstar
Member
- Location
- Scottish Borders
Put a engine on a Dyno at 1400 rpms then 1000rpms and you will find you are so wrong read about the bigger fendt before you open you month and you can see were I am coming from
Speedstar
Member
- Location
- Scottish Borders
Most know me and we have talked about this and they do not have tunnel vision like you and like a straight talking person like me
People generally only like a straight talking person if what they say is based in fact and isn't just muck raking or wide enough of the mark to be made fun of, even better if can be made fun of over many pages on the internet with the straight talker happy to continue to fan the flames through misplaced pride.