livestock 1
Member
Is this a carbon bollix thing?
Ey oop @unlacedgecko ...i'm back. More questions for you....But better cows?
Am I right in that if a cow goes past the 410 days she'll miss out on the claim but if she then calves within the 410 days next time she's eligible?
Ey oop @unlacedgecko ...i'm back. More questions for you....
Bin a long day including 2 lots of remote TB testing, piles of snow, strong winds, loader tractor blown a hose.....and a bad calving.
She's a 4 y/o 2nd calving SD, docile as anything, lovely bag, had and reared first calf fine.
Found this morn just after 8, 3 fields out in 3-4" of snow, sheltering against a tree line.
2 fused feet sticking out her stern.
Evidently a schmallenburg (spelling?)
I phoned a message through to t'vet before I even started to move her back.
(I've only tried to calve one of em before, and that eventually needed the vet anyway.)
Turned out to be a breach, which we got out with the jack with no drama.
(dead) Calf's head and front legs were all 'back' and rigid...IE came out WITH shoulders. Vet reckons her pelvis was massive.
She kept completely calm, desperately wanted to eat any cleansings we dropped, and when we needed the loosebox for another calving , she's back out on a blasted hillside tonight.
(hill reared SDs really are the best kept secret in UK cattle farming)
I won't be buying a calf for her, but if we have a surplus calf in the next 2-3 days, I'll fetch her back in to set it on.
So...should I cull her?
It's no fault of hers.
She'll summer easily, breed quick, and likely put on 100kg and more in stored condition. Will then winter in a cheaper group.
She'd be of a damline I inherited from my very distant ancestors, and as part of a whole, is beyond price to me.
It's a rhetorical question, as I'm sure you've guessed, but perfectly illustrates the nuance thing.
How would you do it?Sure it is, but the method being written about here is far too crude. It's an accountants take.
Fertility is only part of the puzzle.How would you do it?
Your cow will be eligible if she satisfies the criteria the following year.This is messing up my plans a bit. So I currently run 120 spring calvers 10th March to May calving. Have had 50% calf in 3 weeks so by the last cycle there isn’t that many but they currently will fall inside the scheme ok.
I also have autumn calvers from end of September to end of November. For years now I have culled pretty much everything that doesn’t hold in calf on their cycle, an odd thing has slipped round if there has been a good reason. Twins for example.
Due to a planned restructuring after my full time worker left this spring I only ran the bull with the autumn calvers for 6 weeks. Intending to shorten the autumn calving and add the not in calve ones to the spring herd. From 60 bulled there was only about 6 to slip around, 4 to fatten.
Delighted to have such a short calving to look forward too I also had decided I would shorten the spring calving and try and bring it forward by 1-2 weeks. I would anticipate a lot more empty doing this which for a year I’d allow to join the autumn herd.
So under this new rules I’m effectively going to be financially punished for tightening up my calving patterns and being more efficient.
!!!
I also have a few pedigree Charolais cows who are a different level of inefficiency but will just have to live with them if want to produce the odd decent home grown bull.
Does anyone know if a cow is eligible once she falls under the 410 day CI again or is it a case of once broken can’t be claimed again ever?!
Trouble is they need to be seen to be doing something and reality is they could have come up with something much worse. The good thing is we still have a calf scheme with the same budget, which is something our counterparts in England and Wales would love to have.So, there about 400,000 coos in Scotland.
Well, there's seemingly 2million wildebeest marching across the Serengeti, half a million buffalo charging across the plains of America and over 9 million reindeer and caribou making their way up and doon fae the arctic every year.
Is somebody checking up on their calving intervals, to save the planet? Hmmm?
Why are we, tiddly wee Scotland, being encouraged into this nonsense which will make no difference in the grand scheme of things.
Those are all metrics that I cull on.Fertility is only part of the puzzle.
Docility, weight, performance, pelvic size, feet, locomotion, skeletal and muscular characteristics, myostatin carried/not carried, dams/sire milk, dam udder and teat presentation, muzzle width and so on and on.
You absolutely need to know the cows your replacements are coming from in my own opinion.
Just buying in something that is the correct weight and breed will invite it's own issues
Apparently it's a ring fenced pot so the qualifying 80% should get extra money?So if Only 80% of calves qualify do they get the lost 20% money added to the qualifying calves or dose humza use the saved 20% for xmas party ?
The pot stays the same so it’s added to the qualifying calves.So if Only 80% of calves qualify do they get the lost 20% money added to the qualifying calves or dose humza use the saved 20% for xmas party ?
Diet and nutrition. Most suckler farmers put their cows under pressure one way or another through under/over feeding or missing minerals.Those are all metrics that I cull on.
The discussion was about about cow fertility and calf survival so that was the direction I was focusing
YesAm I right in that if a cow goes past the 410 days she'll miss out on the claim but if she then calves within the 410 days next time she's eligible?
You can feed fertility into anything.Diet and nutrition. Most suckler farmers put their cows under pressure one way or another through under/over feeding or missing minerals.
Feeding 500g soya for 3 weeks pre calving gave a fertility bump to cows here
That doesn't make sense I'm afraidYou can feed fertility into anything.
If you have a set of twins just register 1 to herEy oop @unlacedgecko ...i'm back. More questions for you....
Bin a long day including 2 lots of remote TB testing, piles of snow, strong winds, loader tractor blown a hose.....and a bad calving.
She's a 4 y/o 2nd calving SD, docile as anything, lovely bag, had and reared first calf fine.
Found this morn just after 8, 3 fields out in 3-4" of snow, sheltering against a tree line.
2 fused feet sticking out her stern.
Evidently a schmallenburg (spelling?)
I phoned a message through to t'vet before I even started to move her back.
(I've only tried to calve one of em before, and that eventually needed the vet anyway.)
Turned out to be a breach, which we got out with the jack with no drama.
(dead) Calf's head and front legs were all 'back' and rigid...IE came out WITH shoulders. Vet reckons her pelvis was massive.
She kept completely calm, desperately wanted to eat any cleansings we dropped, and when we needed the loosebox for another calving , she's back out on a blasted hillside tonight.
(hill reared SDs really are the best kept secret in UK cattle farming)
I won't be buying a calf for her, but if we have a surplus calf in the next 2-3 days, I'll fetch her back in to set it on.
So...should I cull her?
It's no fault of hers.
She'll summer easily, breed quick, and likely put on 100kg and more in stored condition. Will then winter in a cheaper group.
She'd be of a damline I inherited from my very distant ancestors, and as part of a whole, is beyond price to me.
It's a rhetorical question, as I'm sure you've guessed, but perfectly illustrates the nuance thing.