John 1594
Member
- Location
- Cambridgeshire
Knew this whole thing was going to cause a stink when i backed up to the dyno if im honest
Well I have read the article and it looks to me like the the 1594 was expected to fail miserably, but the test didn't go to plan. What annoys me is the stupid captions with the photos which go out of their way the run the 1594 down, making ridiculous claims like the one about"visibility" and "poor quality dash" they just don't make sense I'm not a tractor nut in any way, but that was the first ever article in CT that I found offensive ( I know sounds crazy, It's just a magazine article) It was just so Biased. John must feel a right mug for taking part.
And by the way I'm off to look at a nice 2wd 956 for the diet feeder, before someone says I wear DB pants....unless someone knows of a 15 or 1694 in N ireland.
It's put me clean off CT for a long time
http://www.walmsleytractors.com/detail_used.php?id=242
I'm not complaining about the test itself, I'm sure it was as fair as could be, but it's just the tone of the whole article, when the results didn't come out the way they were expected. I know myself the 956 has the edge on build quality, they are a lovely going thing, I just don't think john or his tractor deserved the dismissive tone used in the article, It certainly wouldn't encourage me or a lot of people to partake in anything like that in the future. It smacks of a group of kids where one gets the pee taken out of them for the amusment of the rest, just because they're different.
Indeed, I fear I am repeating myself over and over. I will resist from making further posts.
It's getting time this thread was closed
Nick.......
as I said before I did not think this test should have gone ahead but I did and 1594 won . was this done to settle an argument if so ct should not have got involvedWhy's that? It's only just started to get interesting.
If you have a look on the irish forum in "classic tractor this month" thread page 10 onwards it was all decided on there,all the points raised in this thread about what could be fair in testing were discussed,it was known from last december that the 1594 probably had a hp advantage,so why even bother?if finding two old tractors that are equal is so difficult they may as well have found a 7810 with an 8340 engine in and let that have a go,as I said before I did not think this test should have gone ahead but I did and 1594 won . was this done to settle an argument if so ct should not have got involved
Technically correct but you can leave a numpty on a 956 and gearbox wouldn't be any bother,hydrashift needs loveing956 possibly has a better engine, cab n build quality n may last longer before wearing out
BUT 1594 has a vastly superior transmission so its no surprise that it performed best
got a great idea lets have a vote settle it and move on I am a db fan but I would have to go with 956It's going to make it interesting in the future with all the chipping going on now. Rory will have to know all the characteristics of all the differnt chips in use
John won't allow this thread to be closed until it is universally acknowledged by all the forum members that the 1594 is a superior tractor to the 956
956 here, every day of the week. It's 7 years since my one left but, if I could find a nice example and had the spare cash (not sure which is more liable) I would buy one in a flash again.
a bit more grunt for you jamesy
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Case-inte...K_BOI_FarmingEquipment_RL&hash=item20d468ceb6
956 all day long for me to, just behind my 3350.
what a tractor, if i had to money id love a go at that, 1455 v 1594 anyone? how many bits would the 1594 be in after that match?