SLA
Member
- Location
- Lincolnshire
Maybe this is something that can be taught at school along the same lines as they used to have fire brigade come in and do fire safety talks?
2/3 of our land is rough fell land which is all in the right to roam. The other third of the land is improved land which can carry many more times stock per acre. Of this third of the better land I would estimate 3/4 of this has a footpath or footpaths through it. So not much chance to fence off for me.This is the thing, footpaths are a 'political' tool for some and despite many being of no practical use whatsoever they will / must be kept 'on principal'. The only way you'll see some go will if there is a general 'right to roam'. Rock, hard place…
Have to say we have alot of experiance in this department after being sued by a walker who said one of our cows knocked him over. The NFU paid him 30k for a sprained elbow despite only witness being his friend and us not being informed for 5 months when the no win no fee lawyers contacted us.I have moved a footpath which ran diagonally across a field. It now runs down one headland and has been fenced out. I will also grow a new hedge on the field side so there will be a 6' gap between my stock and the public.
Gaining permission to move the path would have been a synch were it not for the unnecessary lies and objections put forward by the Ramblers Association (who have a disproportionate say in these matters).
that claim sounds like "legal theft" to meHave to say we have alot of experiance in this department after being sued by a walker who said one of our cows knocked him over. The NFU paid him 30k for a sprained elbow despite only witness being his friend and us not being informed for 5 months when the no win no fee lawyers contacted us.
We learned several things,
1. legally the farmer is totally responsible for any accidents their animals cause, even in fields with no footpath.(Dangerous animals act)
2.Although difficult we managed to move the Roman wall trail up the side of a field rather than through the middle where we could fence the walkers from the cattle. The Ramblers were surprisingly on board with this after we explained the reason.
3. Signs need to be very carefully worded so as not to admit liabilty or knowledge of any risk.
4. We no longer put cows in fields without fenced paths. It is just not worth the legal hassle. As we have the Roman Wall and Pennine Way, this is seriously restricting our ability to keep cows.
5. The NFU were a good help moving the path (after initially not wanting to know) but offered no fight against the claim as "they didnt want to open the floodgates". They increased their premium the following year by an eye watering sum.
I suppose it depends on what side your on. Was a bit surprised the NFU didn’t put up more of a fight but that’s out of my skill set to know why. He walked to his B and B which was 3 mile away so couldn’t have been too bad. If air ambulance had been needed that would be another matter but it has jaded our experience with walkers which is a shame really.that claim sounds like "legal theft" to me
So what do you do if every grazing field you have has a public footpath in it?Pointless debate, the risk from cows with calves is clear. They should not be put in fields with public footpaths.
Too many footpaths i would say. How does a man farm sucklers when he has a footpath through every field. The public need to decide which is more important...walking or eating!Pointless debate, the risk from cows with calves is clear. They should not be put in fields with public footpaths.
You dont graze it with cows that have calves in tow.So what do you do if every grazing field you have has a public footpath in it?
That would mean sell all cattle herePointless debate, the risk from cows with calves is clear. They should not be put in fields with public footpaths.
Suckler cows do have calves in tow a lot of the timeYou dont graze it with cows that have calves in tow.
Too many footpaths i would say. How does a man farm sucklers when he has a footpath through every field. The public need to decide which is more important...walking or eating!
Same here.That would mean sell all cattle here
Then you have a problem and potentially a disaster on your hands , farmers are not the only businessmen who have to change tack to survive.Suckler cows do have calves in tow a lot of the time
It would mean eradicating every cow in scotlandThat would mean sell all cattle here
Because other countries have more state owned or common land?
I was meaning public access across privately owned farmland.
I know in France there are no privately owned sporting rights and the general public can pursue wildlife without worrying about whose land they are on at the time.
Edit: Pages 6-8 on this pdf briefly describe the situation in other countries.
https://www.researchgate.net/public...costs_and_benefits_of_farmland_walking_trails
In your dreams . you'd be shot the chasse is sacresanct .
So what do you suggest? Buy another farm with no footpaths on it? That’s ok until they decide to instate footpaths on it! Or the labour lot put it in right to roamThen you have a problem and potentially a disaster on your hands , farmers are not the only businessmen who have to change tack to survive.
Reckon that may be about to change.