Right-arm fast
Member
FFS! If you want to see the report it might be worth watching the 6.00 news.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
FFS! If you want to see the report it might be worth watching the 6.00 news.
Not really, the more agricultural land you own yes the more BPS you will have received. Either directly or through it's effect on the rental value of land. But there are some extremely wealthy people who won't have received any BPS, as they don't own or occupy any land.In essence it's correct.
Not really, the more agricultural land you own yes the more BPS you will have received. Either directly or through it's effect on the rental value of land. But there are some extremely wealthy people who won't have received any BPS, as they don't own or occupy any land.
So the BBC statement is completely incorrect.
Not so obvious to the people who don't know about farming and subsidies,Obviously the statement is made within an agricultural/land ownership context.
Hands up everyone who thinks it is a good idea, with everything that Joe Public has gone through over the last 6 months, for farmers to kick off about this ?
Isn’t everyone on here working their asses off paying off a mortgage?
Isn’t everyone on here working their asses off paying off a mortgage?
It's got nothing to do with the public. It's about the BBC and their reporting. The words i quoted were a direct quote from the lunchtime BBC news reporters mouth on the changes to farming. Even if you try and take it out of context of the wider report he made, it is not a correct statement and infers an incorrect assumption to those who don't know any better.Hands up everyone who thinks it is a good idea, with everything that Joe Public has gone through over the last 6 months, for farmers to kick off about this ?
Problem is all the Input Supply Sectors in all types of Farming know we can claim this sub & they want there cut.one thing i will say is that farmers never set the price they were to receive in subsidy its not like i said give me this much ? that's what they paid for at the time and let it roll .. we have all adjusted our businesses to suite .. but they paid us and now make it seem like we paid ourselves ??