If Gordon Broon hadn't got his mits on itThat should earn you a decent pension.
If Gordon Broon hadn't got his mits on itThat should earn you a decent pension.
That should earn you a decent pension.
If Gordon Broon hadn't got his mits on it
You're eligible for french state pension aren't you ?Could be worse, might of worked for Robert Maxwell
I could not face retirement but bent employees forced me into it. I finally took the advice of an employee of 20 years and gave up. When you get to 75 and feel no responsibility to others the attraction wears thin. I am now assisting my last loyal employee to make a business of his own. He will succeed because he possesses qualities which I admire and are quite rare today.I wonder if you were similar - I find I have no interest in retirement, I can’t think what else I would do How is your new retirement working out?
You're eligible for french state pension aren't you ?
You have 7 qualifying years from the UK on your National Insurance record when you reach State Pension age.
You worked in an EEA country for 16 years and paid contributions to that country’s state pension.
You will meet the minimum qualifying years to get the new State Pension because of the time you worked overseas. Your new State Pension amount will only be based on the 7 years of National Insurance contributions you made in the UK.
Sounds about right
What can go wrong .37 years paying in the uk
What can go wrong .
How many years contributions are required in france ?Nothing...
If Farage hadn’t walked from the little plane
You can`t keep a good man down.Nothing...
If Farage hadn’t walked from the little plane
No. I haven't been 'trying' to tell you, I have told you; I have been 'trying' to educate you...But as you keep trying to tell me Brexit isn't about financial gain. If it was nobody in their right mind would have allowed it to happen.
How many years contributions are required in france ?
No. I haven't been 'trying' to tell you, I have told you; I have been 'trying' to educate you...
Brexit is primarily about sovereignty and democracy; the medium to long term financial gains are a happy side benefit. If people had been told the truth before joining the EC / EU, that they would not only be subordinate but would have to subsidise their nearest competitors to their own expense, nobody in their right mind would have allowed it to happen.
As it is, surely nobody in their right mind would carry on bitching and whining for over four years about a democratic vote they lost, and about something that is now, how shall I put it, a fait accompli, upon which they have no effect whatsoever, and which just eats them up, would they...?
But that was part of the contract , as an EU member your citizens could live and work anywhere and the contributions you paid would be taken into account.Not at all, If the person in question had decided to stay in the UK after having given 25 years of his working life to this country then 100% he is entitled to his pension while he resides in the UK. If that person decides to leave then they obviously think they will have a better life/retirement in their new country while still expecting the UK to pay for them.
Cake and eat it springs to mind and we know the EU don't like that.
You don’t think it’s a good thing to help neighbors?
Glad your not mine; cooperation is alive and well in this neighbourhood
Exactly, no one has a problem with that! Its the fact it is being done retrospectively that is the problem.They should stand by their word on this matter and pay back the money if that's what they agreed to do.
But from now on if you leave the country to live somewhere else you are not entitled to any benefit or pension payment, how do I get that passed into legislation?