Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It’s 1995 12 speed forward/reverse shuttlemost 300 series massey had it on the dash or newer ones it was on the back of the sunvisor, what year is it and gearbox, would be the important info
Or somewhat cheaper... https://www.amazon.co.uk/Digital-Ta...jbGlja1JlZGlyZWN0JmRvTm90TG9nQ2xpY2s9dHJ1ZQ==For an accurate measurement.
...not cheap I agree, but it will come in useful over a longer period of time ime.
Sealey TA050 Digital Tachometer Contact/non-contact
Sealey - TA050 - Sealey TA050 Digital Tachometer Contact/non-contact - <p>Professional quality laser instrument for fast and accurate measurement of rotationalwww.rapidonline.com
Yes, I was thinking there might be a cheaper one somewhere and I guess they all come from China originally .
A typo perhaps?It’s 1975 12 speed forward/reverse shuttle
I've had a couple of cheap ones off Amazon & they've tallied fairly close to calibrated units.Yes, I was thinking there might be a cheaper one somewhere and I guess they all come from China originally .
The point is they should in theory as long as used carefully give a more accurate figure than....
Even my most modern ' electronic' tractor is out by 10 or rpm or so on the pto according to my sealey tacho......
It can make a difference to some implements...
TYPO ERROR, its an age thing! 1995..A typo perhaps?
They werent about in 1975.
Yes, I was thinking there might be a cheaper one somewhere and I guess they all come from China originally .
The point is they should in theory as long as used carefully give a more accurate figure than....
Even my most modern ' electronic' tractor is out by 10 or rpm or so on the pto according to my sealey tacho......
It can make a difference to some implements...
Admitedly l know zero about MF 1840 balers but l thought generally small square balers were set on ram strokes/min so exact pto speed would be irrelevant?Bury The Trash, if its only 10 rpm out, how do you know if the Sealey unit is 100% accurate? Im not being pedantic, its that you have mentioned Modern Electronic tractors, I would have thought that their onboard computers would be able to adjust the pro shaft accordingly? Surely there is a certain amount of discrepancy on both sides, not just the tractor!
All I am trying to do is exactly what you have mentioned in your post, I am trying to get the best performance out of our new MF1840 baler, and not knowing what the exact rpm is to drive the pto at 540 on the 390 is the reason for my post..
Absolutely right, thats how we use to set the Jones baler up! the inline baler is different and I really haven't quite got it sorted yet...Admitedly l know zero about MF 1840 balers but l thought generally small square balers were set on ram strokes/min so exact pto speed would be irrelevant?
All you need is a stopwatch.
Ah ok.Absolutely right, thats how we use to set the Jones baler up! the inline baler is different and I really haven't quite got it sorted yet...
There are many things that will affect what speed is seen. For instance if you are using the contact mode with those tachos then you don't necessarily get a reliable contact & that can cause over and under counting - especially when there's vibration. There will be tolerances for how accurate the tractor tacho is, plus the chances are that the gearing will not result in a nice easy number for engine revs, so the manufacturer rounds it to a convenient number - for instance a simple 3:1 ratio would give 1620 rpm so would most likely be listed as 1600 rpmBury The Trash, if its only 10 rpm out, how do you know if the Sealey unit is 100% accurate? Im not being pedantic, its that you have mentioned Modern Electronic tractors, I would have thought that their onboard computers would be able to adjust the pro shaft accordingly? Surely there is a certain amount of discrepancy on both sides, not just the tractor!
All I am trying to do is exactly what you have mentioned in your post, I am trying to get the best performance out of our new MF1840 baler, and not knowing what the exact rpm is to drive the pto at 540 on the 390 is the reason for my post..
100 Ram strokes a minute .Bury The Trash, if its only 10 rpm out, how do you know if the Sealey unit is 100% accurate? Im not being pedantic, its that you have mentioned Modern Electronic tractors, I would have thought that their onboard computers would be able to adjust the pro shaft accordingly? Surely there is a certain amount of discrepancy on both sides, not just the tractor!
All I am trying to do is exactly what you have mentioned in your post, I am trying to get the best performance out of our new MF1840 baler, and not knowing what the exact rpm is to drive the pto at 540 on the 390 is the reason for my post..