- Location
- Buckinghamshire
i am being a bit think were on there website is it pleaseJust found one on nsf website but thank you
Nick...
i am being a bit think were on there website is it pleaseJust found one on nsf website but thank you
Nick...
You don’t need to update it. It is a plan of erosion risk. Slope and soil type remains the same every year.I just up date mine every year by adding a few details but dont think its been looked at for at least five
I was talking to a solicitor friend of mine about farm assurance making unannounced visits and he was astounded. He says even the short notice visits to audit his business requires him to be given two weeks noticeInspectors must know whether anyone is doing anything right or wrong they just get told what they need to hear to pass
I know when some farms get their inspections as there is a major tidy up
You don’t see Vosa telling you when there going to be at the side of the a1 or wherever
I got onto nfu website as I could not find it on nsf sitei am being a bit think were on there website is it please
Pm me your email if you can’t find it and I’ll foreward it.no idea how to add attachmenti am being a bit think were on there website is it please
I filled it in online then they emailed a version I printed outi can only see the online survey rather than a printable version.
IIRC csi or whatever they call themselves have one, the one I used was in the book they sent out years agoAnyone got a template for this
Nick...
Don’t get your hopes up that @Guy Smith will have anything useful to say. I asked him about Red Tractor inspections at a conference back in February with regard to the increasing amount of petty, sometimes pretty unrelated questions that are in the inspections, and how the inspections are year on year just jobs for the boys. He pretty much batted the question away saying that we need more accountability in food production.
Don’t get your hopes up that @Guy Smith will have anything useful to say. I asked him about Red Tractor inspections at a conference back in February with regard to the increasing amount of petty, sometimes pretty unrelated questions that are in the inspections, and how the inspections are year on year just jobs for the boys. He pretty much batted the question away saying that we need more accountability in food production.
Granted it shouldn’t be a free for all, but there needs to be a line drawn on what information needs to be provided. I was left with the impression (which I pretty much knew anyway, but it was confirmed first hand) that the NFU are out for an easy life and would prefer to look after themselves rather than their fee paying members.
Don’t get your hopes up that @Guy Smith will have anything useful to say. I asked him about Red Tractor inspections at a conference back in February with regard to the increasing amount of petty, sometimes pretty unrelated questions that are in the inspections, and how the inspections are year on year just jobs for the boys. He pretty much batted the question away saying that we need more accountability in food production.
Granted it shouldn’t be a free for all, but there needs to be a line drawn on what information needs to be provided. I was left with the impression (which I pretty much knew anyway, but it was confirmed first hand) that the NFU are out for an easy life and would prefer to look after themselves rather than their fee paying members.
@Guy Smith It was in the Q and A section at the end of your speech at the Hutchinsons conference. Plenty of time for you to have been less dismissive, plenty of time to have said “I’ll take your point on board and see what we as a union can do about it”, or even “I’m not sure whether anyone else feels the same as you about this, hang on, let me put a poll on The Farming Forum and see if any other growers think that the whole Red Tractor scheme is getting a bit of a farce”.
But as you have done (at the time of this post) with this thread in which you were tagged for your comment, you have been dismissive about the real issue.