- Location
- North of Perth
Well I've played football all over scotland seen plenty of it.
Well I've played football all over scotland seen plenty of it.
I was specifically referring to Glasshouse and his followers. My take on sectarianism in Scotland was much as you describe and not the way he portrays itWho or what are you referring to by the highlighted part @arcobob ? Are you suggesting that your perceived sectarian problem extends to the entire of my home country? Sectarianism is a problem that exists in a very small but vocal minority of the working class football supporting community around Glasgow, and a few other isolated parts of society. It is not a widespread issue and is unknown in most of the country.
Played against Halkirk. Just the usually verbal abuse,fighting did have the windows of the minibus panned inn on one away day.
What pish you talkI was specifically referring to Glasshouse and his followers. My take on sectarianism in Scotland was much as you describe and not the way he portrays it
If stoking that sort of agenda will become the norm after independence it will turn Scotland onto a basket case economy
Who will invest in an unstable situation? Who will go there on holiday?
Ha no sorry ,they were fine.just thought you meant where had I played.Halkirk, for sectarian behaviour? I couldn't even imagine which side they were on and which you were - it's a model village mostly inhabited by incomers from south of the border....
Football brings out the worst sadly.Well I've played football all over scotland seen plenty of it.
The Salmon is almost the same colour as cod. I won’t touch the stuff.The highland fishery’s days are numberd they are going to be the next big food scare .
You do right.The Salmon is almost the same colour as cod. I won’t touch the stuff.
???The Salmon is almost the same colour as cod. I won’t touch the stuff.
We have a liverpool already, its called glasgowAccording to the ''Pub Landlord'', an independent Scotland will be called ''Jockistan''.
And a condition of them going is that they have to take Liverpool with them.
Absolutely. There's too many passive aggressive comments (and worse!) and remarks of condensation when someone doesn't agree with another's posts/opinion... it's why I usually stay out of this section.
But talking about these things is healthy and I do try to engage.
You're quite correct that's the SNP view and desire - to be independent of rUK (to use your reasoned use of the 'r'), but a member of the EU. That was working from a position inside the EU... I think once we are out, this may need to change. We are entering a very critical period... the future of the UK does hinge on this next 5 years and the deal Westminster/Boris/The Tory's get. If they sell Scotland down the river in any way, they will do the SNPs work for them - likewise if domestically they try to 'punish' our voting patterns.
I don't follow the SNP line. I did vote to remain in the EU. But I can see benefits to leaving - I just wasn't, and still amn't, convinced this current crop of politicians will do us good, so I was happy to stay. Also, now that we are leaving, IF Scotland were to become independent I feel the country would need to have a vote on rejoining the EU (again IF we even qualify to be a member)... I'm not sure a referendum would see us rejoin. In or out isn't an issue, or not to me at least, it is the deal we get that is important.
We won't keep going over the currency but I think Croatia's position is the € is like a coke can, it'll keep getting kicked down the road Infront of them.
Subsequent posts by others on the thread confirm our decision (jointly and severally is probably the correct English legal expression) to be more polite in order to continue a reasoned debate. I lurked on this forum for more than a few months before deciding to join from the terminally ill FWi purely because of the invective amongst posters.
I think that Boris is a lot smarter than a lot of people give him credit for and I am sure that he will not let down the Scottish people. He managed to get the message across, particularly in the NE of England where places that had voted Labour for decades put in a Conservative MP. Ian Lavery, the Labour Party Chairman, had (I think) the smallest majority ever of a Labour MP for that constituency, and would probably have lost it if the Brexit Party had not put up a candidate. I have a lot of knowledge and experience of that constituency, having been bred and reared there and spent my early working life heavily invovled in local governmen there. Not my fault that my mother was south of the Border when I was born, but at least she was north of the Wall and that, at least to many Northumbrians, is the important thing.
I must say that I like your use of "amn't", because in speech I say it myself. It is probably not accepted "proper" language but I think it is just as acceptable as can't. No such word as can't in my opinion. I am more or less apolitical, particularly since I no longer have a vote in the UK since I have been absent for more than 15 years continually. I really enjoy farming different things in different countries and that has meant living in "foreign" places for a lot of the last 40 years.
Quite happy to drop the currency issue too. Too many ifs and buts to know what might occur.
The election result in Scotland suggests that only about 35 -40% of the voters in Scotland want independence.
45% of the votes cast were for the SNP (55% were for Unionist Parties)
Of the above 45% who voted SNP, about 5% to 10% units were Labour supporters who voted tactically for The SNP to keep the Tories out.
So if 40% was the maximum vote for independence, a turnout of 70% shows that only 28% of the total electorate voted for independence. And it is likely that the turnout of independence supporters would be very high (90% at least?).
So Nicola's claim that she has a mandate for Indyref2 is ballcocks. Particularly when the whole of the South of Scotland is a beautiful shade of blue.
You can argue against my logic, but it won't do you any good.
The Scots argument appears to be "its not our parliament" " it doesn't represent us" etc.
The big reason that Scotland no longer has a voice in Westminster is that it votes SNP.
hmmm - is that not the situation nowA dangerous suggestion to Leavers. You wouldn't want the whole of the EU voting, if the UK could leave!