hillman
Member
- Location
- Wicklow Ireland
You can make your own -
i.e Cobalt
Buy cobalt sulphate and dissolve that and administer it up to 1 mg/kg cobalt (35 mg/kg hydrated cobalt sulphate) at monthly intervals.
Waste of time ( or almost) dosing with cobalt monthly.
Sheep can't store it so to be effective it would need to be done a least weekly preferably twice weekly.
yes---run as 1 mob
This is the same flock that in a previous year i split in half at 8 weeks and treated 1/2 with bolus to no effect
Hence my thoughts that it is something that needs fixing on a longer term
Brilliant trial. Why haven't our government agencies done more research like this? Info like that is gold dust
QMS monitor farm in South West Scotland doing a trial with smart shot this year. Some done with full dose,some with half, and control with none. Will post the results in this thread when we have had the next meeting. at the last meeting, just post weaning, very little difference recorded between any group, but I suspect that will have changed now.Anybody using Smartshot?
You can make your own -
i.e Cobalt
Buy cobalt sulphate and dissolve that and administer it up to 1 mg/kg cobalt (35 mg/kg hydrated cobalt sulphate) at monthly intervals.
so would be better treating the plants if it's lacking in the plants ..The bloke who advises me on trace elements reckons anything that is pee'd out is then available to plants so is not lost.
Yes but. He reckons there is no way to get selenium to stay available in the soil if it is sprayed on, but if has passed through a sheep/cow it will stay available.so would be better treating the plants if it's lacking in the plants ..
in a TE drench it's very short term better as a injection or add as prills to fert cheep to add prills to fert and all year supplyYes but. He reckons there is no way to get selenium to stay available in the soil if it is sprayed on, but if has passed through a sheep/cow it will stay available.
Because every farm, and every field almost, is different. Not to mention differences in breed efficiencies at absorbing TE's from forage?
Results from Tim's trial won't necessarily be relevant next door, let alone on a hill somewhere.
The problem I have with this is where we have sheep in the UK. They are naturally suited to more extensive systems and much of the bits of the country with the most sheep have lots of land you struggle with a quad bike, never mind spinning fert. Perhaps leave the better land to the cattle and exploit the less favourable areas for sheep production?in a TE drench it's very short term better as a injection or add as prills to fert cheep to add prills to fert and all year supply
The problem I have with this is where we have sheep in the UK. They are naturally suited to more extensive systems and much of the bits of the country with the most sheep have lots of land you struggle with a quad bike, never mind spinning fert. Perhaps leave the better land to the cattle and exploit the less favourable areas for sheep production?
i get that point but surely if wide spread trails are done across the country it will benefit the farmer and we can slowly understand how different breeds and management systems react to different supplementation's. is it not a good starting point?
why not pick 100 farms across the country and grass/soil sample then categorize breeds and age/type of leys.
also there are farms that are renowned for fattening livestock that require no supplementation, why dont they benchmark these lands and monitor levels over the year?