No.Day 10 of Veganuary; has anyone seen or heard a farming leader giving the pro-livestock side of the story on mainstream media yet ?
How would that work? @Guy Smith rings up Susanna Reid and says "Hi sexy, I'd like to be on your show tomorrow morning to tell everyone what a bunch of numpties these vegans are... Not going to happen.Day 10 of Veganuary; has anyone seen or heard a farming leader giving the pro-livestock side of the story on mainstream media yet ?
And they do it all the time but they don't control what makes it onto the telly. It isn't the most riveting news either, farmers are nice people...who wants to watch that?The NFU has, quite rightly, a well resourced communications team. Is it not a key part of their remit to promote UK agriculture, including the benefits of mixed farming ie livestock, to the genral public ? They are more than capable to doing this without falling into the traps as described above, it's their job.
And they do it all the time but they don't control what makes it onto the telly. It isn't the most riveting news either, farmers are nice people...who wants to watch that?
There's actually quite a lot of stuff from NFU and AHDB being tweeted at present eg iron and vitamin levels in red meat, carbon footprints, nutrient content of milk etc.
But it's all about retweeting. I've got (according to their profiles) vegetarians and plenty of wildlife bods and urban followers on twitter, so they see what I retweet. There is also a lot of criticism online of the 'fact not opinion' aspect that you mentioned, including direct to the messengers - BBC, Guardian etc.It's no more or less riveting than the go vegan side of the argument, and they are getting themselves on the telly/radio on a daily basis.
Fine, but who looks at tweets from the NFU and AHDB ? I work with the non-farming public on a daily basis, and I can say with absolute certainty that the vegan message is having an effect on eating habits, and is doing so because people are being presented with the 'meat is killing the planet' message not as an opinion but as a statement of fact.
Veganism is specifically about saving the planet - the modern form of it actually started as an extension of vegetarianism and a desire to minimise the exploitation of animals. The supposed environmental benefits are just a side issue that some people have decided to focus on as being a good reason to get involved especially since the environment is a hot issue at the moment.Annoys me that Vegans are such idealistic hypocrites. If vegans principles are to save the planet,that must mean they do not drive cars, fly in planes, use electricity etc etc, a complete load of ballocks as I expect they all do use the aforementioned.
I assume that vegans also believe that the food they eat will be grown organically.
Am I missing something as in reaIity I can not see how veaganism idealogy is sustainable.????
I think Vegans/ vegetarians have no idea what would happen to all the grass meadows, moorland,hillland, range land,Etc etc across the planet if there were no animals to graze the aforementioned areas . Do they not realise that unless grazed grassland will mainly return to scrubland which is not always good for attracting wildlife.Veganism is specifically about saving the planet - the modern form of it actually started as an extension of vegetarianism and a desire to minimise the exploitation of animals. The supposed environmental benefits are just a side issue that some people have decided to focus on as being a good reason to get involved especially since the environment is a hot issue at the moment.