Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks, I'm fully aware of that ...........
Definitely a different ballgame when you see the cost of repair
belt is the only good bit of a suzukican am must be shocking if there less reliable!!The can am I am learning is not built to last.
They are very comfortable, rapid, and have a very sturdy chassis frame.
However comparing it to my Suzuki king quad, the can am bearings are of poor quality. The can am hardi spicers are so soft that most mechanics cans who work on them carry spares alongside consumables like oil filters and brake pads.
What alarms me most is the wonderful engine doesn't have any clutch between the flywheel and the drive belt. Unlike all Japanese bikes that have a centrifugal clutch driving the main belt, the can am belt is driven directly off the flywheel. Any slip must be taken up by the belt.
While many owners will never put the bike into hard enough work for this to be a problem, hill ground and trailer towing kills the belt.
This design makes the can am less expensive to manufacture, but vastly increases the maintenance and running costs. How it affects the used value will become apparent when I go to trade it in.
belt is the only good bit of a suzukican am must be shocking if there less reliable!!
nice bikes at the start but frankly not build to last, frame if soft in all the wrong places and mud lies in bits its impossible to wash off, suspension sags and goes all rolly, eats front brakes like there going out of style, they like a drink too compared to a honda but the main problem is that silly fuel injection system what a balls up
im guessing you don't do major mileage/ haven't had it long enough to find any of these problems?
HaveHonestly though, same arguments can be had about Honda's.
Chassis break - even the new models. Trailing rear axel is still as soft as a fresh turd on the splines. The single rear shocker sags like feck after 18month. The ride is awful and will give you a bad back (my back has never been better since I stopped using them). The rack capacity and tow capacity is a joke - 600kg is IRS only, the rest are 385kg. They are seriously under powered compared to the rest, and thirsty for it!
I don't know much of the IRS, but I've seen 2 in some epic state - and they weren't very old
The best thing about them is the warranty.
hondas might not be what they were but i can tell you they dont give the bother suzukis do and they stand up to 10000-15000km a year and heavy towing (300-600kg) across the hill one hell of a lot better than they do! plus they dont burn as much fuel doing it. Its true they dont have the power but the suzukis just fall to bits so its no much help having the power is it?Honestly though, same arguments can be had about Honda's.
Chassis break - even the new models. Trailing rear axel is still as soft as a fresh turd on the splines. The single rear shocker sags like feck after 18month. The ride is awful and will give you a bad back (my back has never been better since I stopped using them). The rack capacity and tow capacity is a joke - 600kg is IRS only, the rest are 385kg. They are seriously under powered compared to the rest, and thirsty for it!
I don't know much of the IRS, but I've seen 2 in some epic state - and they weren't very old
The best thing about them is the warranty.
Me and my big mouth.Users have a BIG effect on the longevity of any particular marque and getting feedback should be taken lightly.
I am sympathetic towards my machinery, I believe if you look after it then itl look after you.
Ive seen some bikes that are wrecked at 18mnths old. The CanAm will stand the test of time in my hands but wouldn't last an afternoon in the hands of our shepherd.
Users have a BIG effect on the longevity of any particular marque and getting feedback should be taken lightly.
I am sympathetic towards my machinery, I believe if you look after it then itl look after you.
Ive seen some bikes that are wrecked at 18mnths old. The CanAm will stand the test of time in my hands but wouldn't last an afternoon in the hands of our shepherd.
No pull start eitherMe and my big mouth.
Shot 2 stags on the hillside tonight, when I got back to bike it wouldn’t fuking start.
Don’t buy an CanAm, they’re sh1t.
Wouldn’t have made a difference, it just spun over but wouldn’t fire.No pull start either
I aint got a traxtor but know a man who has three, he highly recommends them.Not wishing to hi jack this thread, but has any one got a Can Am traxter ssv ? Got one on demo at moment and can’t really fault it, but just wondering longer term reliability!
Tried a new Honda Pioneer first, as we’ve always had Honda quads, very very disappointed.
They are numb aren’t they, I was trying to bring in a limmy cow with a sunburnt calf (!!!!) this morning and the huge turning circle coupled with the very notchy gearstick almost drove me mental ( I said almost ), problem is I can’t see much better out there. Modern bikes are very disappointing.We've got a Can Am on demo this week. I'm struggling to get on with it, it's soooo huge. Feels like your legs are being forced apart when you're sitting on it, it's so wide. Not really enjoying the CVT either so far. Hmmm.
They are numb aren’t they, I was trying to bring in a limmy cow with a sunburnt calf (!!!!) this morning and the huge turning circle coupled with the very notchy gearstick almost drove me mental ( I said almost ), problem is I can’t see much better out there. Modern bikes are very disappointing.
yeah I bought it as it’s sold by a good local lad/ dealer and we were used to auto hondas which you can’t get anymore and recommendations on here as I can’t be arsed to demo every bloomin make.....but I wished I hadI've had a quick go on one, not a demo or anything though so I wasn't on it for long.
The handling is awful I don't see why so many like them fast though