- Location
- Essex
Somewhere round there. It's got to be enough that farmers will do as they're told to avoid penalties.Best to plan for none I think. I reckon max £30-40/ha?
Somewhere round there. It's got to be enough that farmers will do as they're told to avoid penalties.Best to plan for none I think. I reckon max £30-40/ha?
I know you are being tongue in cheek , but doubt he is spending £400M+ on land and infrastructure just to collect a few quid per acre in comparison!Dyson will be selling up
Plenty of threads discussing what stage their handout is at!We have had many years to prepare for the loss of subs yet still there appears to be those who want still get their yearly fix, how many of those who take on FBT land say the sub just goes to the land owner ? So why are they worried by it going, rents will plummet if farming isnt profitable, inputs will need to follow, machinery prices will drop.
The going gets tough the tough get going, if it gets as bad as the 1930's which is very unlikely the same will happen, a whole new generation of young keen vibrant generation of farmers will emerge.
Too many of the current one has become too used to get their fix and taking on more ground just to willy wave over how many acres they farm.
Gossip is someone locally has just tendered over £200 for bare land.Best to plan for none I think. I reckon max £30-40/ha?
Best to plan for none I think. I reckon max £30-40/ha?
But there is no relation to earning potential, it’s just a tax dodge.Imbalance in terms of those with and without. Never seemed much of an issue a few years ago.
Would be a great photo op for the guardian if we had to queue up at the dole office for it, all those shiny range rovers parked upPlenty of threads discussing what stage their handout is at!
Of course! Probably more guff than now.Will you still be posting ?
Depends how good the land is and what their system was. But you couldn’t pay that without bps included on the land.Gossip is someone locally has just tendered over £200 for bare land.
Not and AD plant either!
This is very true. Subsidised EU agriculture is coming to an end, maybe EU agriculture is coming to an end?
BB
I don’t think that is enough for the hassle. There is a lot of hidden costs in these schemesSomewhere round there. It's got to be enough that farmers will do as they're told to avoid penalties.
Dyson will be selling up
We have had many years to prepare for the loss of subs yet still there appears to be those who want still get their yearly fix, how many of those who take on FBT land say the sub just goes to the land owner ? So why are they worried by it going, rents will plummet if farming isnt profitable, inputs will need to follow, machinery prices will drop.
The going gets tough the tough get going, if it gets as bad as the 1930's which is very unlikely the same will happen, a whole new generation of young keen vibrant generation of farmers will emerge.
Too many of the current one has become too used to get their fix and taking on more ground just to willy wave over how many acres they farm.
Average farm size 400 acres X £30 =12000. Enough to keep within the rules I would suggest.I don’t think that is enough for the hassle. There is a lot of hidden costs in these schemes
I was talking in hectares £4800Average farm size 400 acres X £30 =12000. Enough to keep within the rules I would suggest.
It will all go out of the window if the massive shortages they keep predicting ever materialise.
Future is exciting. Bring it on.We have had many years to prepare for the loss of subs yet still there appears to be those who want still get their yearly fix, how many of those who take on FBT land say the sub just goes to the land owner ? So why are they worried by it going, rents will plummet if farming isnt profitable, inputs will need to follow, machinery prices will drop.
The going gets tough the tough get going, if it gets as bad as the 1930's which is very unlikely the same will happen, a whole new generation of young keen vibrant generation of farmers will emerge.
Too many of the current one has become too used to get their fix and taking on more ground just to willy wave over how many acres they farm.
Yes you were, I have reread your post! I think I would be tempted to stick two fingers up at that. In fact I would pay something in that order to make them go away.I was talking in hectares £4800
You won’t see a group of young men and women taking on 3/400 acres each though.We have had many years to prepare for the loss of subs yet still there appears to be those who want still get their yearly fix, how many of those who take on FBT land say the sub just goes to the land owner ? So why are they worried by it going, rents will plummet if farming isnt profitable, inputs will need to follow, machinery prices will drop.
The going gets tough the tough get going, if it gets as bad as the 1930's which is very unlikely the same will happen, a whole new generation of young keen vibrant generation of farmers will emerge.
Too many of the current one has become too used to get their fix and taking on more ground just to willy wave over how many acres they farm.
You won’t see a group of young men and women taking on 3/400 acres each though.
it’ll mean the very big operators getting even bigger . Our estate doesn’t re let any family sized farms anymore . There’s 3 sets of what were good buildings and houses, just going to rack and ruin here, with the land all going to one preferred tenant on FBT .
The landlords can’t be bothered to do up the old farmhouses and can’t be short of money as they don’t sell them off.
These were farms supporting good sized dairy herds with some sheep and arable and 2/3 families making a living.
Families that sent their children to the village school, used the shop, pub etc.
A lot of the land also isn’t suitable for a big no till drill to turn round in.
I’m interested in what future you see for these type of farms.
Future is exciting. Bring it on.
With respect I don’t see what your type of operation does for rural communities .Future is exciting. Bring it on.